Comparative study of data preparation methods in quantum clustering algorithms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oumayma Ouedrhiri ◽  
Oumayma Banouar ◽  
Said Raghay ◽  
Salah Elhadaj
Author(s):  
Naghmeh Pakgohar ◽  
Javad Eshaghi Rad ◽  
Gholam Hossein Gholami ◽  
Ahmad Alijanpour ◽  
David W. Roberts

Author(s):  
Sai Lakshmi Nikhita Sagi ◽  
Mamatha Narsapuram ◽  
Pravallika Nakarikanti ◽  
Sahithi Sane ◽  
Sai Sudha Vadisina ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
B.K. Tripathy ◽  
Adhir Ghosh

Developing Data Clustering algorithms have been pursued by researchers since the introduction of k-means algorithm (Macqueen 1967; Lloyd 1982). These algorithms were subsequently modified to handle categorical data. In order to handle the situations where objects can have memberships in multiple clusters, fuzzy clustering and rough clustering methods were introduced (Lingras et al 2003, 2004a). There are many extensions of these initial algorithms (Lingras et al 2004b; Lingras 2007; Mitra 2004; Peters 2006, 2007). The MMR algorithm (Parmar et al 2007), its extensions (Tripathy et al 2009, 2011a, 2011b) and the MADE algorithm (Herawan et al 2010) use rough set techniques for clustering. In this chapter, the authors focus on rough set based clustering algorithms and provide a comparative study of all the fuzzy set based and rough set based clustering algorithms in terms of their efficiency. They also present problems for future studies in the direction of the topics covered.


2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. AB319
Author(s):  
Jong Soo Lee ◽  
Yoon Tae Jeen ◽  
Seung Han Kim ◽  
Jae MIN Lee ◽  
Hyuk Soon Choi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Wei Hou ◽  
Cheng-Zhi Qin ◽  
A-Xing Zhu ◽  
Peng Liang ◽  
Yi-Jie Wang ◽  
...  

One of the key concerns in geographic modeling is the preparation of input data that are sufficient and appropriate for models. This requires considerable time, effort, and expertise since geographic models and their application contexts are complex and diverse. Moreover, both data and data pre-processing tools are multi-source, heterogeneous, and sometimes unavailable for a specific application context. The traditional method of manually preparing input data cannot effectively support geographic modeling, especially for complex integrated models and non-expert users. Therefore, effective methods are urgently needed that are not only able to prepare appropriate input data for models but are also easy to use. In this review paper, we first analyze the factors that influence data preparation and discuss the three corresponding key tasks that should be accomplished when developing input data preparation methods for geographic models. Then, existing input data preparation methods for geographic models are discussed through classifying into three categories: manual, (semi-)automatic, and intelligent (i.e., not only (semi-)automatic but also adaptive to application context) methods. Supported by the adoption of knowledge representation and reasoning techniques, the state-of-the-art methods in this field point to intelligent input data preparation for geographic models, which includes knowledge-supported discovery and chaining of data pre-processing functionalities, knowledge-driven (semi-)automatic workflow building (or service composition in the context of geographic web services) of data preprocessing, and artificial intelligent planning-based service composition as well as their parameter-settings. Lastly, we discuss the challenges and future research directions from the following aspects: Sharing and reusing of model data and workflows, integration of data discovery and processing functionalities, task-oriented input data preparation methods, and construction of knowledge bases for geographic modeling, all assisting with the development of an easy-to-use geographic modeling environment with intelligent input data preparation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document