Invited Commentary: The Challenges of Early-Onset Breast Cancer

Radiographics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. E16-E17
Author(s):  
Debra L. Monticciolo
2021 ◽  
pp. jmedgenet-2020-107347
Author(s):  
D Gareth Evans ◽  
Elke Maria van Veen ◽  
Helen J Byers ◽  
Sarah J Evans ◽  
George J Burghel ◽  
...  

BackgroundWhile the likelihood of identifying constitutional breast cancer-associated BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 pathogenic variants (PVs) increases with earlier diagnosis age, little is known about the correlation with age at diagnosis in other predisposition genes. Here, we assessed the contribution of known breast cancer-associated genes to very early onset disease.MethodsSequencing of BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 and CHEK2 c.1100delC was undertaken in women with breast cancer diagnosed ≤30 years. Those testing negative were screened for PVs in a minimum of eight additional breast cancer-associated genes. Rates of PVs were compared with cases ≤30 years from the Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic vs Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) study.ResultsTesting 379 women with breast cancer aged ≤30 years identified 75 PVs (19.7%) in BRCA1, 35 (9.2%) in BRCA2, 22 (5.8%) in TP53 and 2 (0.5%) CHEK2 c.1100delC. Extended screening of 184 PV negative women only identified eight additional actionable PVs. BRCA1/2 PVs were more common in women aged 26–30 years than in younger women (p=0.0083) although the younger age group had rates more similar to those in the POSH cohort. Out of 26 women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone, most were high-grade and 11/26 (42.3%) had a PV (TP53=6, BRCA2=2, BRCA1=2, PALB2=1). This PV yield is similar to the 61 (48.8%) BRCA1/2 PVs identified in 125 women with triple-negative breast cancer. The POSH cohort specifically excluded pure DCIS which may explain lower TP53 PV rates in this group (1.7%).ConclusionThe rates of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 PVs are high in very early onset breast cancer, with limited benefit from testing of additional breast cancer-associated genes.


1988 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
Patrice Watson ◽  
Theresa Conway ◽  
Mary Lee Fitzsimmons ◽  
Jane Lynch

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Enders K. O. Ng ◽  
Edmund Y. H. Tang ◽  
Chris L. P. Wong ◽  
Fian B. F. Law ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1273-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Cecener ◽  
G. Guney Eskiler ◽  
U. Egeli ◽  
B. Tunca ◽  
A. Alemdar ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 1287-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
ORLAND DIEZ ◽  
AMADEU PELEGRÍ ◽  
NEUS GADEA ◽  
SARA GUTIÉRREZ-ENRÍQUEZ ◽  
MIRIAM MASAS ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Måns Agrup ◽  
Olle Stäl ◽  
Karen Olsen ◽  
Sten Wingren

2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Hu ◽  
Jiong Wu ◽  
Can-Hui Liu ◽  
Jing-Song Lu ◽  
Jian-Ming Luo ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 359 (9316) ◽  
pp. 1471-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce G Haffty ◽  
Elizabeth Harrold ◽  
Atif J Khan ◽  
Pradip Pathare ◽  
Tanya E Smith ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
pp. 70-86
Author(s):  
Kathleen E. Malone ◽  
Janet R. Daling ◽  
Nicola M. Suter ◽  
Kara Cushing ◽  
Thora Jonnasdottir ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document