scholarly journals Evolving Bioprosthetic Tissue Calcification Can Be Quantified Using Serial Multislice CT Scanning

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
B. Meuris ◽  
H. De Praetere ◽  
W. Coudyzer ◽  
W. Flameng
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Flohr ◽  
Klaus Klingenbeck-Regn ◽  
Bernd Ohnesorge ◽  
Stefan Schaller
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Douglas Kampondeni ◽  
Gretchen Lano Birbeck ◽  
Robert J. Oostveen ◽  
Colleen Hammond ◽  
Michael James Potchen

Brainstem pathology due to infections, infarcts and tumors are common in developing countries, but neuroimaging technology in these resource-poor settings is often limited to single slice, and occasionally spiral, CT. Unlike multislice CT and MRI, single slice and spiral CT are compromised by bone artifacts in the posterior fossa due to the dense petrous bones, often making imaging of the brainstem non-diagnostic. With appropriate head positioning, the petrous ridges can be avoided with 40˚ sagittal oblique scans parallel to either petrous ridge. We describe an alternative sagittal oblique scanning technique that significantly reduces brainstem CT artifacts thereby improving clarity of anatomy. With Inst­itutional Ethical approval, 13 adult patients were enrolled (5 males; 39%). All patients had routine axial brain CT and sagittal oblique scans with no lesions found. Images were read by 2 readers who gave a score for amount of artefact and clarity of structures in the posterior fossa. The mean artifact score was higher for routine axial images compared to sagittal oblique (2.92 vs. 1.23; P<0.0001). The mean anatomical certainty scores for the brainstem were significantly better in the sagittal oblique views compared to routine axial (1.23 vs. 2.77; P<0.0001). No difference was found between the two techniques with respect to the fourth ventricle or the cerebellum (axial vs. sag oblique: 1.15 vs. 1.27; P=0.37). When using single slice CT, the sagittal oblique scanning technique is valuable in improving clarity of anatomy in the brainstem if axial images are non-diagnostic due to bone artifacts.


2020 ◽  
pp. 4781-4806
Author(s):  
Andrew Davenport

An accurate history and careful examination will determine the sequence and spectrum of clinical investigations required to make a diagnosis or decide on prognosis or treatment for renal disease. Midstream urine (MSU) sample—this standard investigation requires consideration of (1) macroscopic appearance, (2) stick testing, and (3) microscopy. Quantification of proteinuria—this is important because the risk for progression of underlying kidney disease to endstage renal failure is related to the amount of protein in the urine. Low molecular weight proteinuria is caused by proximal tubular injury and can be detected with markers. Knowledge of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is of crucial importance in the management of patients, not only for detecting the presence of renal impairment, but also in the monitoring of all patients with or at risk of renal impairment, and in determining appropriate dosing of those drugs cleared by the kidney. Measurement of plasma creatinine remains the standard biochemical test used to assess renal function. The simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (sMDRD) formula is explained, along with a revised version (CKD-EPI). Investigations of tubular function, including the proximal tubule, distal tubule, and renal-induced electrolyte and acid–base imbalances are discussed in this chapter. Renal imaging covered in this chapter includes ultrasonography, ultrafast multislice CT scanning, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine scanning, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Invasive techniques including antegrade or retrograde ureteropyelography and angiography are discussed. A renal biopsy should be considered in any patient with disease affecting the kidney when the clinical information and other laboratory investigations have failed to establish a definitive diagnosis or prognosis, or when there is doubt as to the optimal therapy.


2004 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger Mechlenburg ◽  
Jens Nyengaard ◽  
Lone Rømer ◽  
Kjeld Søballe

Author(s):  
M. Shlepr ◽  
R. L. Turner

Calcification in the echinoderms occurs within a limited-volume cavity enclosed by cytoplasmic extensions of the mineral depositing cells, the sclerocytes. The current model of this process maintains that the sheath formed from these cytoplasmic extensions is syncytial. Prior studies indicate that syncytium formation might be dependent on sclerocyte density and not required for calcification. This model further envisions that ossicles formed de novo nucleate and grow intracellularly until the ossicle effectively outgrows the vacuole. Continued ossicle growth occurs within the sheath but external to the cell membrane. The initial intracellular location has been confirmed only for elements of the echinoid tooth.The regenerating aboral disc integument of ophiophragmus filograneus was used to test the current echinoderm calcification model. This tissue is free of calcite fragments, thus avoiding questions of cellular engulfment, and ossicles are formed de novo. The tissue calcification pattern was followed by light microscopy in both living and fixed preparations.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 412-412
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Tewari ◽  
Assaad El-Hakim ◽  
Peter N. Schlegel ◽  
Mani Menon ◽  
Deirdre M. Coll

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (16) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
ELIZABETH MECHCATIE
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hamiko ◽  
M Endlich ◽  
C Krämer ◽  
C Probst ◽  
A Welz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document