scholarly journals Dynamic Stabilisation in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease with Modic Changes

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olcay Eser ◽  
Cengiz Gomleksiz ◽  
Mehdi Sasani ◽  
Tunc Oktenoglu ◽  
Ahmet Levent Aydin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Dynamic Stabilization ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Posterior Dynamic Stabilization ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

Objective. Posterior dynamic stabilization is an effective alternative to fusion in the treatment of chronic instability and degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine. This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of dynamic stabilization in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic types 1 and 2. Modic types 1 and 2 degeneration can be painful. Classic approach in such cases is spine fusion. We operated 88 DDD patients with Modic types 1 and 2 via posterior dynamic stabilization. Good results were obtained after 2 years of followup.Methods. A total of 88 DDD patients with Modic types 1 and 2 were selected for this study. The patients were included in the study between 2004 and 2010. All of them were examined with lumbar anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays. Lordosis of the lumbar spine, segmental lordosis, and ratio of the height of the intervertebral disc spaces (IVSs) were measured preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis was carried out, and according to the data obtained, the grade of disc degeneration was classified. The quality of life and pain scores were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Appropriate statistical method was chosen.Results. The mean 3- and 12-month postoperative IVS ratio was significantly greater than that of the preoperative group (P<0.001). However, the mean 1 and 2 postoperative IVS ratio was not significantly different (P>0.05). Furthermore, the mean preoperative and 1 and 2 postoperative angles of lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis were not significantly different (P>0.05). The mean VAS score and ODI, 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery, decreased significantly, when compared with the preoperative scores in the groups (P=0.000).Conclusion. Dynamic stabilization in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic types 1 and 2 was effective.

scholarly journals Posterior Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization versus Total Disc Replacement in the Treatment of Lumbar Painful Degenerative Disc Disease: A Comparison of Clinical Results

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tunc Oktenoglu ◽  
Ali Fahir Ozer ◽  
Mehdi Sasani ◽  
Yaprak Ataker ◽  
Cengiz Gomleksiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Total Disc Replacement ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Dynamic Stabilization ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Disc Prosthesis ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean

Study Design. Prospective clinical study.Objective. This study compares the clinical results of anterior lumbar total disc replacement and posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization in the treatment of degenerative disc disease.Summary and Background Data. Over the last two decades, both techniques have emerged as alternative treatment options to fusion surgery.Methods. This study was conducted between 2004 and 2010 with a total of 50 patients (25 in each group). The mean age of the patients in total disc prosthesis group was 37,32 years. The mean age of the patients in posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization was 43,08. Clinical (VAS and Oswestry) and radiological evaluations (lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis angles) of the patients were carried out prior to the operation and 3, 12, and 24 months after the operation. We compared the average duration of surgery, blood loss during the surgery and the length of hospital stay of both groups.Results. Both techniques offered significant improvements in clinical parameters. There was no significant change in radiologic evaluations after the surgery for both techniques.Conclusion. Both dynamic systems provided spine stability. However, the posterior dynamic system had a slight advantage over anterior disc prosthesis because of its convenient application and fewer possible complications.

scholarly journals Effect of Core Stabilizing Training on Young Individuals Presenting Different Stages of Degenerative Disc Disease—Preliminary Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3499
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kuligowski ◽  
Błażej Cieślik ◽  
Natalia Kuciel ◽  
Agnieszka Dębiec-Bąk ◽  
Anna Skrzek
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Preliminary Report ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Core Stability ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of stabilizing training for the deep core muscles of the lumbar spine in subjects with degenerative disc disease. This study was conducted on 38 participants. The participants were divided into two groups: the extrusion group (EXT, n = 17) and the protrusion group (PRO, n = 21). All the subjects underwent a four-week-long core stability exercise-based treatment (five sessions/week). Clinical outcome measures were assessed pre-intervention (pre), post-intervention (post) and four weeks after the intervention (follow-up). The primary outcome measures were the spinal range of motion (ROM; Spinal Mouse® device) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). In the PRO group, the ROM decreased from 88.52° pre-intervention to 83.33° post-intervention and to 82.82° at follow-up (p = 0.01), while the ODI decreased from 16.14 points pre-intervention to 6.57 points post-intervention, with 9.42 points at follow-up (p < 0.01). In the EXT group, the ROM decreased from 81.00° pre-intervention to 77.05° post-intervention, then increased to 77.94° at follow-up (p = 0.03), while the ODI decreased from 22.58 points pre-intervention to 15.41 points post-intervention and to 14.70 points at follow-up (p < 0.001). Although the stabilizing exercise sessions improved the clinical outcomes in each group, we cannot make conclusions as to whether the type of intervertebral disc damage significantly affects the results of stabilizing exercise-based treatment.

Long-term outcome of fusion for degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1526-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Endler ◽  
Per Ekman ◽  
Ivan Berglund ◽  
Hans Möller ◽  
Paul Gerdhem
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Posterolateral Fusion ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

AimsChronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF).Patients and MethodsA total of 2874 patients who were operated on at one or two lumbar levels were followed for a mean of 9.2 years (3.6 to 19.1) for any additional lumbar spine surgery. Patient-reported outcome data were available preoperatively (n = 2874) and at one year (n = 2274), two years (n = 1958), and a mean of 6.9 years (n = 1518) postoperatively and consisted of global assessment and visual analogue scales of leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol five-dimensional index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and satisfaction with treatment. Statistical analyses were performed with competing-risks proportional hazards regression or analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline variables.ResultsThe number of patients with additional surgery were 32/183 (17%) in the PLF group, 229/1256 (18%) in the IPLF group, and 439/1435 (31%) in the IBF group. With the PLF group as a reference, the hazard ratio for additional lumbar surgery was 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.72) for the IPLF group and 2.13 (95% CI 1.45 to 3.12) for the IBF group. All patient-reported outcomes improved after surgery (p < 0.001) but were without statistically significant differences between the groups at the one-, two- and 6.9-year follow-ups (all p ≥ 0.12).ConclusionThe addition of interbody fusion to posterolateral fusion was associated with a higher risk for additional surgery and showed no advantages in patient-reported outcome Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1526–1533

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document