scholarly journals Restauration Fonctionnelle du Rachis : Effet du Niveau Initial de Douleur sur Les Performances des Sujets Lombalgiques Chroniques

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. e133-e138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Caby ◽  
N Olivier ◽  
F Mendelek ◽  
R Bou Kheir ◽  
J Vanvelcenaher ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a persistent lumbar pain of multifactorial origin. The initial pain level remains poorly used to analyze and compare responses in low back pain patients in a reconditioning program.OBJECTIVE: To assess and evaluate the responses of subjects with very painful chronic low back pain in a dynamic and intensive care program.METHODS: A total of 134 patients with chronic low back pain were included in a spine functional restoration program for five weeks. The subjects were classified into two groups by level of pain: a group experiencing severe pain (n=28) and a group experiencing mild to moderate pain (n=106). All subjects received identical support consisting primarily of physiotherapy, occupational therapy, cardiovascular and muscular reconditioning as well as psychological counselling. The physical parameters (flexibility, muscular strength) and psychological (quality of life) were measured before (T0) and after the program (T5sem).RESULTS: All physical and functional performances of the subjects with severe pain were lower and the impact of back pain on quality of life for these subjects was increased. All significant differences at T0 between the two groups were no longer present at T5sem.DISCUSSION: Muscular atrophy is more important in subjects with severe pain at T0. The intense pain would cause kinesiophobia and central inhibition in chronic low back pain. The analgesic effects of the spine functional restoration program allowed subjects to obtain similar physical, functional and psychological performances at the end of the five weeks of support.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with very painful chronic low back pain respond favourably to the dynamic and intensive program. The intensity of low back pain had no effect on responses to the program. The spine functional restoration program enables patients to better manage their pain, whatever its level.

Pain Medicine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Huge ◽  
Ulrike Schloderer ◽  
Martin Steinberger ◽  
Bernt Wuenschmann ◽  
Peter Schöps ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 603-609
Author(s):  
Camila Teixeira de Oliveira ◽  
Michel Kanas ◽  
Marcelo Wajchenberg

ABSTRACT Introduction: Dysfunction of the core muscles contributes to the persistence of pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Evidence shows that the active approach is beneficial in the rehabilitation of these patients. However, there is uncertainty as to the most effective methods or form of exercise, as the literature offers little guidance in this regard. Objective: To analyze and compare the impact on quality of life, function, flexibility, abdominal strength and abdominal fat rate in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain after a program of resistance training using two different forms of exercise. Methods: Thirty individuals, aged between 18 and 65 years, participated in the study. Twenty performed physical training program twice a week for eight weeks, and ten did not perform any physical exercises, but received guidance and pain relief. The physically active individuals were randomly divided in two groups and received similar resistance training, focusing on the same muscle groups. Ten performed training with dumbbells and bodybuilding machines (TRCP) and ten did not use this equipment (TRSP). All were assessed before and after the intervention, through questionnaires on quality of life and function, and tests for flexibility, abdominal strength and measurement of the abdominal fat rate. Results: In the intra-group comparison (initial vs eight weeks), there were no significant differences in quality of life in any of the groups. However, regarding function, the three groups showed significant improvement, with TRSP showing the best evolution. For flexibility and abdominal strength gain, TRCP showed the best evolution in both instruments. For decrease in abdominal fat rate, only TRCP showed significant differences. In the intergroup comparison, there were no significant differences for any of the evaluated outcomes. Conclusion: The two exercise programs were effective in improving function, flexibility and abdominal strength in patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain. However, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the outcomes in the comparison between groups. Level evidence II, Comparative prospective study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
José W. Geurts ◽  
Paul C. Willems ◽  
Jan-Willem Kallewaard ◽  
Maarten van Kleef ◽  
Carmen Dirksen

Introduction. Chronic discogenic low back pain (CDP) is frequently diagnosed in patients referred to specialized pain clinics for their back pain. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of CDP both on the individual patient and on society. Materials and Methods. Using the baseline records of 80 patients in a randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of a new intervention for CDP, healthcare and societal costs related to back pain are calculated. Furthermore, the impact of the condition on perceived pain, disability, health-related quality of life, Quality of life Adjusted Life Years (QALY), and QALY loss is assessed. Results. Using the friction costs approach, we found that the annual costs for society are €7,911.95 per CDP patient, 51% healthcare and 49% societal costs. When using the human capital approach, total costs were €18,940.58, 22% healthcare and 78% societal costs. Healthcare costs were mainly related to pain treatment. Mean pain severity was 6.5 (0–10), and 46% suffered from severe pain (≥7/10). Mean physical limitations rate was 43.7; 13.5% of the patients were very limited to disabled. QALY loss compared to a healthy population was 64%. Discussion. This study shows that in patients with CDP referred to a pain clinic, costs for society are high and the most used healthcare resources are pain therapies. Patients suffer severe pain, are physically limited, and experience a serious loss in quality of life.


2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olle Hägg ◽  
Carol Burckhardt ◽  
Peter Fritzell ◽  
Anders Nordwall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document