scholarly journals Hindfoot Valgus following Interlocking Nail Treatment for Tibial Diaphysis Fractures: Can the Fibula Be Neglected?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Metin Uzun ◽  
Adnan Kara ◽  
Müjdat Adaş ◽  
Bülent Karslioğlu ◽  
Murat Bülbül ◽  
...  

Purpose. We evaluated whether intramedullary nail fixation for tibial diaphysis fractures with concomitant fibula fractures (except at the distal one-third level) managed conservatively with an associated fibula fracture resulted in ankle deformity and assessed the impact of the ankle deformity on lower extremity function.Methods. Sixty middle one-third tibial shaft fractures with associated fibular fractures, except the distal one-third level, were included in this study. All tibial shaft fractures were anatomically reduced and fixed with interlocking intramedullary nails. Fibular fractures were managed conservatively. Hindfoot alignment was assessed clinically. Tibia and fibular lengths were compared to contralateral measurements using radiographs. Functional results were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index Score (FADI).Results. Anatomic union, defined as equal length in operative and contralateral tibias, was achieved in 60 fractures (100%). Fibular shortening was identified in 42 fractures (68%). Mean fibular shortening was 1.2 cm (range, 0.5–2 cm). Clinical exams showed increased hindfoot valgus in 42 fractures (68%). The mean KOOS was 88.4, and the mean FADI score was 90.Conclusion. Fibular fractures in the middle or proximal one-third may need to be stabilized at the time of tibial intramedullary nail fixation to prevent development of hindfoot valgus due to fibular shortening.

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Cereijo ◽  
Basem Attum ◽  
Andres Rodriguez-Buitrago ◽  
A. Alex Jahangir ◽  
William Obremskey

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian J. Ko ◽  
Peter J. OʼBrien ◽  
Pierre Guy ◽  
Henry M. Broekhuyse ◽  
Piotr A. Blachut ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 605-610
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Bozovic ◽  
Rade Grbic ◽  
Dragisa Milovic ◽  
Zlatan Elek ◽  
Dusan Petrovic ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objective. Tibial shaft fractures (TSF) are one of the most common fractures. External fixation (EF) may be used to treat TSF. The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment of TSF with Mitkovic EF. Methods. The study included 100 patients with TSF treated with Mitkovic EF as the primary and definite method of treatment. The results are compared to those in the literature. Results. The patient group comprised 67% male and 33% female patients aged 10?71years. TSF is common in adult males in the fourth and fifth decades of life. The most common cause is falling with the twisting of the leg (59%). Closed fractures were observed in 76 patients (57.4% of type A AO, 25.4% of type B AO, and 17.1% of type C AO), and open fractures in 34 patients (50% of type I GA, 32.35% of type II GA, and 17.64% of type III GA). The average time period from injury to surgery was 2.5 days (the range being 4 hours to 9 days). Bone healing was achieved in 93% of patients. The average healing time was 18.4 weeks (the range being 11?32 weeks). The distribution of complications is as follows: 10% for minor pin site infections; 4% for major pin site infections; 6% for nonunion; 1% for acute respiratory distress syndrome; 2% for osteitis. There was no deep vein thrombosis nor neurovascular damage. EuroQol score was excellent in 82% of the patients. Conclusion. Mitkovic EF can be used for treating all types of TSF. Functional results of treatment by this method are excellent. The data analysis of the series does not differ from the data in the literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-908
Author(s):  
A. Devendra ◽  
Nishith P Gupta ◽  
Mohd Zackariya Jaffrulah ◽  
B. R. W. Armstrong ◽  
J. Dheenadhayalan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (04) ◽  
pp. 600-605
Author(s):  
ROOHULLAH JAN ◽  
ZAHID ASKAR ◽  
JAVED IQBAL

Introduction: Open Tibial shaft fractures are one of the most common fractures of long bones. External fixation is methodof choice for the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures. The subcutaneous location of tibia makes it suitable for the application of externalfixator. Patients and Methods: This study was done on 50 patients at Orthopaedics and Trauma unit “B” at Khyber Teaching Hospital,Peshawar, from Jan 2008 to Feb. 2009 to determine functional outcome of A.O. external fixator in open tibial fractures in terms of knee andankle mobility, pain and gait on full body weight bearing. The data of all patients was entered in standardized proforma and analyzed onSPSS 10. Results: There were 43 (86%) males and 7 (14%) females. There were 17 (34%) type-II and 20 (40%) type IIIA and 13 (26%)type III B fractures. Knee mobility was full (100%) in 49 (98%) cases, 75% in 1(2%). 43 (86%) cases retained 100% ankle joint mobilitywhile it was 75% in 4 (8%), 50 % in 2 (4%) cases and 25 % in 1(2%) cases. On full body weight bearing, 42(84%) patients were pain free,and moderate pain was in 4(8%) cases. In 42(84%) cases the gait was completely normal on full body weight bearing while 3(6%) casesshowed significant limping. Conclusion: The excellent functional results in our series show that external fixation of tibia is safe andeffective in terms of restoring functions of tibia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document