Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2126
(FIVE YEARS 707)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Published By Medknow Publications

0019-5413

Author(s):  
Ashwin Gobbur ◽  
Vijay Kumar Konkathi ◽  
Gangireddi Suresh Babu ◽  
Girinivasan Chellamuthu ◽  
Sathish Muthu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vasileios K. Mousafeiris ◽  
Anastasia Vasilopoulou ◽  
George D. Chloros ◽  
Michalis Panteli ◽  
Peter V. Giannoudis

Abstract Background Bilateral acetabular fractures constitute a rare entity, and their optimal management is unknown. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library between 1995 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were studies presenting cases of bilateral acetabular fractures and reporting outcomes. Extracted data included patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture classification, associated injuries, management and outcomes. Results Thirty-seven studies (47 cases; 35 males vs 12 females) were included. Mean age was 46 years old (range 13–84) and mean follow-up was 19.8 months (range 1.5–56). High-energy injuries (49%) and seizures (45%) were the most common injury mechanisms. Fracture type distribution differed according to injury mechanism. Treatment was surgical in 70% of cases (75% open reduction and internal fixation vs 25% acute total hip arthroplasty). Outcomes were excellent/good in 58% of patients. Complications included heterotopic ossification (11%), nerve injury (11%), degenerative arthritis (6%), DVT (6%), and infection (3%). Conclusions Bilateral acetabular fractures most commonly occur either after trauma or seizures and are commonly managed operatively. They are not devoid of complications, however, more than half (58%) achieve complete functional recovery.


Author(s):  
Prasoon Kumar ◽  
Pratik M. Rathod ◽  
Sameer Aggarwal ◽  
Sandeep Patel ◽  
Vishal Kumar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Praveen Ravi ◽  
Jambu Nageswaran ◽  
Muthumanickam Ramanujam ◽  
Sundar Suriyakumar ◽  
Elancheral Ayanambakkam Nambi

Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Hongbin Yang ◽  
Zhenyan Yu ◽  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Jigong Hu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Pelvic and acetabular fractures are common orthopedic diseases, and this research was to investigate the therapeutic effects of pararectus and Stoppa approaches in treating complex pelvic acetabular fractures. Methods The clinical information of patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures treated surgically in Lu'an Hospital of Chinese medicine, China from January 2016 to April 2020 was analyzed. There were 30 cases each in the transabdominal pararectus approach and modified Stoppa approach groups. The operation time, incision length, blood loss, and postoperative complications of both groups were recorded according to the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel hip score. The recovery of hip function was evaluated 6 months after surgery, and the clinical and therapeutic efficacies of the two groups were compared. Results The patients were followed up for 6–7 months (average, 6.5 months). The average operation time, incision length, and blood loss in the pararectus and Stoppa approach groups were 180 ± 41.105 min, 8.667 ± 1.373 cm, 259.667 ± 382 mL and 202.667 ± 32.793 min, 11.600 ± 1.958 cm, and 353.667 ± 590 mL, respectively. The satisfactory rate of fracture reduction, excellent and good rate of hip function score, and incidence of complications were 28/30, 27/30, 1/30 and 25/30, 25/30, 3/30, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time, incision length, and blood loss between the two groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of hip function score, fracture reduction satisfaction, and complication rate between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions The pararectus approach can reveal the better anatomical structure of the pelvis and acetabulum, such as the corona mortis and quadrilateral plate, for conducive fracture reduction and fixation. It can also effectively shorten the length of the incision, reduce operative blood loss, and shorten the operation time. It is a better choice for the clinical treatment of complex pelvic and acetabular fractures.


Author(s):  
Charlotte Cibura ◽  
Emre Yilmaz ◽  
Dina Straeter ◽  
Thomas A. Schildhauer ◽  
Christiane Kruppa

Abstract Introduction Purpose of the study is to present and discuss the femoral neck osteotomy as a salvage procedure for unstable, locked geriatric acetabular fractures in selected frail patients. When disadvantages and possible risks of other treatments exceed the benefits, this method may relieve pain and allow for early wheelchair mobilization in frail patients with limited mobility. Materials and Methods We report nine patients from 2008 to 2020, which were treated with an osteotomy of the femoral neck for an unstable acetabular fracture. Indications, ASA-Score, Frailty Index, operative procedure, length of hospital stay, complications and outcomes will be discussed. Results Patient’s age averaged 86 years (range 81–92). Acetabular fractures were classified as six both column fractures, two anterior column posterior hemitransversal fractures and one destruction of the acetabulum by multiple metastases. Fracture dislocation with medialization plus locking of the femoral head and a superomedial dome impaction were present in all patients. All patients were classified as ASA III/ IV and the average value on the CSHA Frailty index was 7 (range 6–7). The operation time averaged 52 min (range 34–62). Immediate wheelchair mobilization in seven out of nine patients was started postoperatively. Conclusion The osteotomy of the femoral neck may be discussed as a salvage procedure in low functional demanding, multimorbid, frail geriatric patients with unstable acetabular fractures and impairment of mobilisation due to a locked femoral head. The procedure has the advantages of a short operation time and immediate mobilization of the patients. However, this procedure only applies as a salvage solution in selected individual cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document