scholarly journals A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Wallerstein ◽  
Andrea Jelks ◽  
Matthew J. Garabedian

Objective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management.Study Design. Beginning in January 2013, we initiated a new patient care model in which high-risk patients for aneuploidy received genetic counseling at 12 weeks of gestation. Patients were presented with four pathways for aneuploidy risk assessment and diagnosis: (1) cfDNA; (2) integrated screening; (3) direct-to-invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis); or (4) no first trimester diagnostic testing/screening. Patients underwent follow-up genetic counseling and detailed ultrasound at 18–20 weeks to review first trimester testing and finalize decision for amniocentesis.Results. Counseling and second trimester detailed ultrasound were provided to 163 women. Most selected cfDNA screening (69%) over integrated screening (0.6%), direct-to-invasive testing (14.1%), or no screening (16.6%). Amniocentesis rates decreased following implementation of cfDNA screening (19.0% versus 13.0%,P<0.05).Conclusion. When counseled about screening options, women often chose cfDNA over integrated screening. This program is a model for patient-directed, efficient delivery of a newly available high-level technology in a public health setting. Genetic counseling is an integral part of patient education and determination of plan of care.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Emily Willner

Prenatal genetic testing offers patients and providers the opportunity to screen for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, and congenital malformations during pregnancy. Screening options include taking a clinical history, evaluation of maternal serum markers or noninvasive cell-free DNA, and ultrasound evaluation during the first and second trimesters. Invasive diagnostic testing such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling allows for further investigation of positive screening results and a directed test to identify aneuploidy as well as specific gene mutations and gain, loss, or rearrangement of genetic information. Laboratory methods for testing fetal samples differ by types of genetic abnormalities that can be detected and turnaround time for results; these methods include karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and microarray.   This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables and 43 references Key words: amniocentesis, aneuploidy, cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, karyotype, microarray, prenatal genetic screening, ultrasonography  


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Cordoba ◽  
Stephanie Andriole ◽  
Shara M. Evans ◽  
David Britt ◽  
Melissa Chu Lam ◽  
...  

Objectives: The explosion in genetic technologies, including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), has increased the complexity of genetic counseling. We now offer chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and aCGH to all first-trimester patients, as this allows the prenatal diagnosis of an additional 1% of anomalies not otherwise detectable and can detect genetic copy number variants at a much higher resolution than conventional cytogenetics. Here, we explored some of the determinants of how patients are deciding to use or not use this new technology and evaluate risk-benefit analyses for that decision. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of singleton and multiples pregnancies at our center. Those having aCGH testing along with CVS were defined as ‘testers' and those who declined aCGH but had the CVS were ‘nontesters'. Results: Demographic data of 181 educated women who chose CVS were compared. Among those carrying singletons (n = 144), older women, defined as over 35 years of age (or ‘advanced maternal age'; AMA), were more likely to choose the aCGH than younger women. Further, women who had a prior history of genetic testing and who wanted to know the gender of the fetus were more likely to choose the aCGH test. In women carrying multiples (n = 37), AMA ceases to be a predictor of choice. Having had prior genetic counseling remains a strong predictor for choosing aCGH, as does wanting to know the gender of the fetus. Neither prior abortions nor having prior children were significant for women carrying singletons or multiples. Conclusion: Offering pregnant couples an individualized choice regarding aCGH seems an appropriate approach. There are discrete patterns associated with the choice of taking the aCGH that varied depending on whether the patient was carrying a singleton or multiples.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeta L. Vora ◽  
Kirby L. Johnson ◽  
Inga Peter ◽  
Hocine Tighiouart ◽  
Steven J. Ralston ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Emily Willner

Prenatal genetic testing offers patients and providers the opportunity to screen for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, and congenital malformations during pregnancy. Screening options include taking a clinical history, evaluation of maternal serum markers or noninvasive cell-free DNA, and ultrasound evaluation during the first and second trimesters. Invasive diagnostic testing such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling allows for further investigation of positive screening results and a directed test to identify aneuploidy as well as specific gene mutations and gain, loss, or rearrangement of genetic information. Laboratory methods for testing fetal samples differ by types of genetic abnormalities that can be detected and turnaround time for results; these methods include karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and microarray.   This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables and 43 references Key words: amniocentesis, aneuploidy, cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, karyotype, microarray, prenatal genetic screening, ultrasonography  


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Emily Willner

Prenatal genetic testing offers patients and providers the opportunity to screen for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, and congenital malformations during pregnancy. Screening options include taking a clinical history, evaluation of maternal serum markers or noninvasive cell-free DNA, and ultrasound evaluation during the first and second trimesters. Invasive diagnostic testing such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling allows for further investigation of positive screening results and a directed test to identify aneuploidy as well as specific gene mutations and gain, loss, or rearrangement of genetic information. Laboratory methods for testing fetal samples differ by types of genetic abnormalities that can be detected and turnaround time for results; these methods include karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and microarray.   This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables and 43 references Key words: amniocentesis, aneuploidy, cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, karyotype, microarray, prenatal genetic screening, ultrasonography  


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Uquillas ◽  
Yen Chan ◽  
Jennifer R. King ◽  
Linda M. Randolph ◽  
Marc Incerpi

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M. Gil ◽  
Maria Soledad Quezada ◽  
Barbara Bregant ◽  
Argyro Syngelaki ◽  
Kypros H. Nicolaides

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document