scholarly journals The Role of Additional K-Wires on AO Type C Distal Radius Fracture Treatment with External Fixator in Young Population

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Micic ◽  
Erica Kholinne ◽  
Yucheng Sun ◽  
Jae-Man Kwak ◽  
In-Ho Jeon
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Type C ◽  
K Wires

Objectives. Several methods have been proposed to treat AO type C distal radius fracture. External fixator has gained popularity for its simple procedure and rapid recovery. Some surgeons suggested that additional K-wires may play a critical role in the outcome. The purpose of study is to evaluate the role of additional K wires in treating distal radial fracture with external fixator regarding its outcome. Material and Methods. From January 2006 to January 2010, 40 patients with AO type C distal radius fracture were treated with external fixator, with (EF) or without additional K wires (EFK). Radiologic outcome parameters include radial inclination, volar tilt, radial length, and the presence of radiocarpal arthritis according to Knirk and Jupiter. Clinical outcomes include New York Orthopedic Hospital (NYOH) wrist scoring scale. Results. Radiographic outcome showed significant difference in regard of articular congruency at the final follow-up with the EFK group showing the advantage in maintaining the articular incongruity. NYOH wrist scoring scale showed no significant difference between both groups at final follow-up. The amount of articular step-off was less in EFK group with significant statistical finding on the final follow up. Conclusion. Both EF and EFK technique were able to provide satisfactory result in treating AO type C distal radius fractures. We observed that EFK is superior in reducing the number of radiocarpal arthritic changes compared to EF group due to its superiority in reducing articular step-off.

scholarly journals The role of brachioradialis release during AO type C distal radius fracture fixation

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 1099-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ma ◽  
X. Zheng ◽  
X.-B. He ◽  
K.-J. Guo
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Type C

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF VOLAR LOCKING PLATE VERSUS EXTERNAL FIXATION FOR DISPLACED INTRAARTICULAR DISTAL END RADIUS FRACTURES AT ORTHOPAEDICS DEPARTMENT OF DMCH, LAHERIASARAI, BIHAR

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Kunal Shankar ◽  
Vikash M. Harinandan ◽  
Laljee Chaudhary ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Plate Versus ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures

Background: Distal radius fracture is more common accounting for 1/6th of the all fractures. With this background, this study was carried out to compare the functional outcome of volar locking plate and external fixator to the displaced intra-articular distal end radius fractures using Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Materials and methods: This study included those patients with distal radius fracture attending the Orthopaedic Department of DMCH, Laheriasarai, Bihar, during January 2019 to December 2019. Patients were randomised based on - even and odd day of the week. This included two set of group with twenty patients in each group- one with volar locking plating and other with external fixation. Patients were followed up at 6 months and 1 year. At each follow up, the pain and range of movements were assessed by MMWS score which was entered in Microsoft excel and analysed in SPSS 20. Results: At the end of one year after surgery, we observed that external fixation technique was superior for treating displaced intra-articular comminuted distal end radius fractures than volar locking plate. Conclusion: External fixator showed more advantageous than volar locking plates after 1year of follow up.

Is external fixation a better way than plaster to supplement K-wires in non-comminuted distal radius fractures?

2017 ◽  
Vol 94 (1107) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajjad M Athar ◽  
Neil Ashwood ◽  
George Aerealis ◽  
Gregory I Bain
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Wire Fixation ◽  
K Wires ◽  
Metaphyseal Comminution

BackgroundDistal radius fractures represent about one-sixth of all fractures. There is still no consensus on the treatment of this fracture. We have several issues to assess and address; one of them is the fixation method. We tried to compare the effectiveness of two methods of stabilisation of distal radial fracture. Comparison between the techniques of Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation with plaster and K-wire fixation with external fixation (Ex-Fix) was undertaken to assess which treatment modality gives better results in patients with distal radius fracture Frykman VII and VIII with no metaphyseal comminution.MethodFifty-six patients were chosen randomly and then allocated to two different modalities of stabilisation randomly as well, they were followed up; three of them were lost to follow-up because of death and two moved away from the area. Fifty-one patients were randomised in two groups: 24 were treated with K-wire and spanning Ex-Fix supplementation and 27 were treated with K-wires and plaster. Patients were prospectively monitored following the operation with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Measurement of range of motion was obtained after surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain and satisfaction levels were also recorded.ResultsThere was statistically significant difference in favour of the Ex-Fix patient group for pain (VAS, Ex-Fix group: mean 14.9; plaster group: mean 28.1) and satisfaction (Ex-Fix group: mean 89.7;plaster group: mean 76.3). Although one would expect that range of motion would be reduced in the Ex-Fix group, there were no statistically significant differences found, with the exception of supination where results were in favour of the Ex-Fix group (mean 54.4; plaster group: mean 45.2).ConclusionIn our study, xternal fixator (Ex-Fix) supplementation of K-wiring favoured patients with distal radius fracture, even though there was no metaphyseal comminution, and therefore is suggested in contrast to plaster supplementation.

“Age Is Just a Number”: Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 75

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472090655
Author(s):  
Jacob E. Tulipan ◽  
Aron Lechtig ◽  
Tamara D. Rozental ◽  
Carl M. Harper
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Outcome Differences

Background: Management of distal radius fractures in patients over 65 is a topic of significant study, but there are variations within this group in terms of independence and activity level. This study compares the outcomes of operative distal radius fracture treatment in patients over 75 with those aged 65 to 74, to evaluate the effects of patient demand and advanced age on outcome. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-institution distal radius fracture database was performed. All patients over age 65 were evaluated for inclusion. Patient factors including activity, independence level, and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) score were recorded. Patients were selected for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) based on a discussion between the patient and the treating surgeon. Outcome measures including QuickDASH were recorded at 1-year post-injury. Patients aged 65 to 74 and 75 and over were compared to evaluate for demographic, functional, and outcome differences. Results: In all, 75 patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients were aged 65 to 74, and 24 patients were aged over 75. The majority of patients rated themselves as “completely independent” and “active,” the highest levels of each. There was no difference in QuickDASH scores between those patients who rated themselves as completely partially independent, or active versus moderately active. There was no statistically significant difference in QuickDASH or range of motion parameters at final follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that, in a group of patients with high levels of independence and activity, outcomes are similar in patients aged 65 to 74 and over 75 at 1 year following distal radius ORIF.

Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Ipsilateral Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472199973
Author(s):  
Nicholas Munaretto ◽  
Adam Tagliero ◽  
Raahil Patel ◽  
Peter C. Rhee
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Functional Classification ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Ipsilateral Hemiparesis

Background Little information exists to guide decision-making with regard to distal radius fractures in the setting of ipsilateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia. Methods Patients who sustained a distal radius fracture in the setting of ipsilateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia secondary to brain injury were evaluated. Investigated variables included perioperative pain, preinjury House functional classification score, length of immobilization, radiographic outcome measurements, and time to union. Results There were 15 patients with distal radius fractures with a mean age of 65.9 years. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 2.8 and 2.9 years, respectively. Wrists were placed into the nonoperative group (NOG, n = 10) and operative group (OG, n = 5). Pain significantly decreased at final follow-up for both groups. Baseline House functional classification scores averaged 1.3 and 1.6 for the NOG and OG, respectively, and were maintained at final follow-up. Length of immobilization for the NOG was 46 days and OG was 37 days, P = .15. Radiographic outcomes at final follow-up in the NOG and OG, respectively, were a mean radial height of 9.3 versus. 11.6 mm, radial inclination of 18.3° versus 22.3°, 4.2° dorsal tilt versus 5.3° volar tilt, and tear drop angle of 45.6° versus 44.5°. There were no significant differences in these measurements. Time to radiographic union averaged 58 days for the NOG and 67 days for the OG, P = .42. There were no revision surgeries. Conclusions Based on this small case series, patients with distal radius fracture and ipsilateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia may have similar clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes, regardless of nonoperative or operative treatment.

scholarly journals Radius distraction could contribute to long-term stability for treating distal radioulnar joint instability during volar plating of distal radius fracture: a retrospective case series study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Yu Yin ◽  
Hui-Kuang Huang ◽  
Duretti Fufa ◽  
Jung-Pan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Distal Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Druj Instability

Abstract BackgroundThe surgical technique of radius distraction for stabilization of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) if intraoperative DRUJ instability was found after the fixation of distal radius fracture has been previously described, but this surgical technique lacks clinical and radiographic effect in minimal 3 years follow-up. We therefore evaluated the clinical outcome and radiographic results of radius distraction in minimal 3 years follow-up.MethodsWe reviewed the case series of distal radius fracture with concomitant DRUJ instability receiving radius distraction from the senior author over a 5-year period (January 1st, 2013 to June 30th, 2017) retrospectively, and the evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed at clinic as long-term follow-up; a total 34 patients had been evaluated.ResultsAt minimal post-operative 36 months follow-up, all cases demonstrated acceptable wrist range of motion with stable DRUJs and low NRS of wrist pain (0.6, SD 0.7) and DASH score (mean 9.1, SD 6.2), and there were no cases suffering from nonunion of distal radius. The mean ulnar variance of injured wrist and uninjured wrist were − 1.2 mm and 0.2mm, respectively (SD 1.0 and 0.6) with significant statistical difference.ConclusionsRadius distraction during volar fixation of distal radius fracture should be consider if DRUJ instability was found by the radioulnar stress test intraoperatively, and the long-term DRUJ stability could be achieved by maintenance of normal-to-negative ulnar variance, with decreased wrist pain and satisfactory function outcome.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level IV

Treatment of the Distal Radius Fracture with Hinged External Fixator

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1710
Author(s):  
Sung Do Cho ◽  
Dong Bae Shin ◽  
Yong Sun Cho ◽  
Bum Soo Kim ◽  
Tae Woo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Hinged External Fixator

The Role of Early Post-Operative Radiographs Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation with a Volar Locking Plate: Time for Change?

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 435-439
Author(s):  
Vivek Sharma ◽  
Caroline Witney-Lagen ◽  
Samuel Cullen ◽  
Edward Kim ◽  
Zakir Haider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Articular Fractures ◽  
Fracture Management

Background: The role of early radiographic imaging in the management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess whether early post-operative radiographs for DRFs influences the ongoing management of this patient group. We hypothesize that routine early radiographs do not influence the management of DRFs. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate between 2012 and 2017 at our institution. Patients were identified using hospital electronic databases. Clinical information was gathered from the electronic health records and PACS systems and analysed on a spreadsheet. An early post-operative radiograph was defined by the authors as imaging on a patient’s first postoperative visit. Results: 237 patients were identified. The median number of days patients were reviewed post-operatively was 13 (interquartile range 9–16). 172 (73.1%) patients had early post-operative radiographs, with 100 (58.1%) intra-articular and 72 (41.9%) extra-articular fractures. Of patients who underwent imaging, 7 (4.0%) had their post-operative fracture management altered (7 intra-articular, 0 extra-articular) with 1 (0.58%) requiring immediate surgical revision as indicated by imaging. Conclusions: Our study questions the value of routine early post-operative radiographs in the management of distal radius fracture fixations, in particular if the fracture is extra-articular. This is of importance in the setting of constrained resources and represents a poor use of limited healthcare facilities, as well as unnecessary radiation exposure.

Comparing Outcomes between Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction and Fluoroscopic Reduction in AO Type C Distal Radius Fracture Treatment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siu Cheong Jeffrey Justin Koo ◽  
Kam Yiu Adrian Leung ◽  
Wai Wang Chau ◽  
Pak Cheong Ho
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Fracture Reduction ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Type C ◽  
Assisted Fracture

Abstract Background Distal radius fracture is one of the most common injuries. Poor functional result with restricted wrist motion can be developed when there is intra-articular fibrous tissue development arising from articular step-off and gapping. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the functional and radiological outcome between arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fluoroscopic reduction in treating unstable intra-articular distal radius fracture. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients with intraarticular AO type C distal radius fracture treated with arthroscopic-assisted fracture reduction and internal fixation and compared them with another group of 12 patients in which fracture reduction is assessed by fluoroscopy alone (15 males and 9 females, mean age 57.3, range 27–73). The two cohorts were analyzed for differences in radiological parameters including articular stepping and gapping, palmar tilt, radial inclination, ulnar variance as well as functional outcome in range of motion, grip strength, modified mayo wrist score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at an average of 12.5 months (range 5–26) after surgery. Results Arthroscopic-assisted fracture reduction group has statistically better restoration of articular stepping and gapping, volar tilt and ulnar variance. Range of motion, grip strength, modified mayo wrist score and Quick DASH score also had statistically significant improvement in arthroscopic group. Conclusion Our study showed arthroscopic-assisted technique can precisely restore radiological parameters in highly comminuted distal radius fracture with good functional outcome. Also, associated intra-articular soft tissue injury can be detected and treated simultaneously. Level of Evidence This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document