scholarly journals Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Angiography or Intervention through the Distal Radial Access: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jun Cao ◽  
Huaxiu Cai ◽  
Weibin Liu ◽  
Hengqing Zhu ◽  
Gang Cao
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Objectives. Searching the literature for coronary angiography (CAG) or intervention through distal radial access (DRA) and performing a meta-analysis. Background. Coronary angiography (CAG) or intervention through distal radial access (DRA) may have a similar success rate, low radial artery occlusion rate, low radial artery spasm rate, and low rate of puncture site hematoma for patients with coronary heart disease. Therefore, the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched, and the data were pooled for meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DRA. Methods. RCTs comparing the CAG or intervention through DRA vs. transradial access (TRA) published between January 1, 2017, and May 4, 2021, were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The endpoints included the rate of access success and the number of radial artery occlusions, radial artery spasms, and puncture site hematomas. The data were extracted, and a random-effects model was used for analysis. Results. Among 204 studies, 6 RCTs (with 2825 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to TRA, the access success rate in DRA ( p = 0.1 ) and the lower rate of puncture site hematoma were not significantly different ( p = 0.646 ), while the radial artery occlusion rate ( p < 0.001 ) and radial artery spasm rate ( p = 0.029 ) were significantly lower. Conclusion. In summary, DRA has a similar access success rate and incidence of hematoma at the puncture site, but a lower incidence of RAO and spasm compared to TRA. These findings demonstrated that DRA is a safe and effective access for CAG or intervention.

scholarly journals Distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mhanna ◽  
A Beran ◽  
S Nazir ◽  
A Al-Abdouh ◽  
M Barbarawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Palmar Arch ◽  
Local Complications ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract Introduction Distal transradial artery access (DTRA) has recently gained attention due to potential benefits in terms of local complications and risk of superficial palmar arch ischemia in case of radial artery occlusion. Purpose In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the utility of DTRA compared to conventional transradial artery access (CTRA) for coronary angiography and intervention. Method We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases from inception through February 2021 for all the studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DTRA for coronary angiography and intervention. The primary outcome of interest was access success rate. The secondary outcomes were periprocedural local complications (site hematoma, radial artery occlusion or spasm) and procedural characteristics (cannulation, fluoroscopy, and radial artery compression times). All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model. Results A total of 8 studies including 1630 patients (805 underwent DTRA vs. 825 with CTRA), were included in the final analysis. Three of the included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the remainder were observational studies. The access success rate was similar in the two groups (odds ratio (OR): 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–2.09; P=0.43; I2=72%). Similarly, no difference was observed in the overall periprocedural local complications rate (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38–1.04, P=0.07, I2=25%). On subgroup analysis, the rate of radial artery occlusion was significantly lower in DRTA group (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.82, P=0.02, I2=0%). Regarding the procedural characteristics, the two approaches were different only in the cannulation time favoring the CTRA group (mean difference in minutes [MD] 0.96, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; P=0.02). Conclusions The DTRA represents an alternative site for radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions, with a high success rate accompanied by a low risk of complications. Although the cannulation time was longer for the DTRA, this can potentially improve with training, practice, and utilization of ultrasound-guided punctures. The major advantage provided by the DTRA is the trend toward a lower risk of radial artery occlusion, which is frequently observed with the conventional approach. Further adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Central illustration

scholarly journals A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion—The RESCUE-RAO Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dmitrii V. Ognerubov ◽  
Alexander Sedaghat ◽  
Sergey I. Provatorov ◽  
Andrey S. Tereshchenko ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Coronary Procedures ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Background. Despite the enormous benefits of radial access, this route is associated with a risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Objective. We compared the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography and intervention after short versus prolonged hemostasis protocol. Also we assessed the efficacy of rescue 1-hour ipsilateral ulnar artery compression if RAO was observed after hemostasis. Material and Methods. Patients referred for elective transradial coronary procedures were eligible. After 6 F radial sheath removal, patients were randomized to short (3 hours) (n = 495) or prolonged (8 hours) (n = 503) hemostasis and a simple bandage was placed over the puncture site. After hemostasis was completed, oximetry plethysmography was used to assess the patency of the radial artery. Results. One thousand patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups with average age 61.4 ± 9.4 years (71% male) and PCI performed on half of the patients. The RAO rate immediately after hemostasis was 3.2% in the short hemostasis group and 10.1% in the prolonged group ( p < 0.001 ). Rescue recanalization was successful only in the short group in 56.2% (11/19); at hospital discharge, RAO rates were 1.4% in the short group and 10.1% in the prolonged group ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Shorter hemostasis was associated with significantly less RAO compared to prolonged hemostasis. Rescue radial artery recanalization was effective in > 50%, but only in the short hemostasis group.

Safety and efficacy of different arterial pressure bandages following percutaneous coronary interventions from radial access: preliminary data of the RAD-PRESS trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Nemeth ◽  
F Nowotta ◽  
Z Ruzsa ◽  
T Szuk ◽  
D Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Hematoma Formation ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Compression Time ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract Background The overwhelming majority of diagnostic coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are performed via radial access as recommended by the current European revascularization guidelines. Using dedicated pressure bandages for the radial access site in high-volume centres can be a significant part of the budget of catheterization laboratories, therefore we developed a cost-effective pressure bandage utilizing wrapped empty glass vials of intravenous medications. Furthermore, compression time of the radial puncture site following PCI is a predictor of radial artery occlusion, therefore shortening the period of compression to as short as possible is feasible. Purpose Our aim was to validate efficacy and safety of our cost-effective pressure bandage by comparing it to two dedicated devices, as well as reducing length of compression to as short as possible. Methods We designed the RAD-PRESS trial, major inclusion criteria of which were first puncture of a radial artery with a diameter greater than 1.8mm, PCI performed as per guidelines utilizing a 6 French guiding catheter and age below 80 years. Patients were then randomized to receive one of three pressure bandages: the glass vial, Seal-One or the gold standard TR-band. Release of pressure was performed as fast as possible in 10-minute steps, and guided by pulse oximetry. Hematoma formation was thoroughly checked for all patients and categorized using the Easy scale. Radial artery patency was investigated by ultrasound 24 hours after final removal of the bandage. The data of 40 patients of every group was analysed. Results Population characteristics were similar among the groups. Length of compression time (126±10, 142±11 and 144±11 mins for Vial, Seal-One and TR-band, respectively, p&gt;0.05), hematoma formation (Easy Grade 1 in 17.5%, 15.0% and 10.0%, Easy Grade 2 in 5.0%, 7.5% and 7.5% for Vial, Seal-One and TR-band, respectively, all p&gt;0.05) were not significantly different among the groups. Radial artery occlusion occurred in only 2 patients (Vial and TR-Band groups), accounting for 1.7% of the cases. Conclusions The cost-effective wrapped vial strategy to compress the radial puncture site was comparable to both Seal-One and the gold standard TR-band regarding safety and efficacy. Furthermore, compression time could be safely shortened to approximately 2.5 hours. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 17406: Early Experience With Ultrasound Guided Distal Trans-Radial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox in Coronary Angiography and Intervention

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangyeub Lee ◽  
Woong-su Yoon ◽  
Daehwan Bae ◽  
Min Kim ◽  
Sang Min Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Early Experience ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Ultra Sound ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Radial Approach ◽  
Radial Access

Early experience with ultrasound guided distal trans-radial access in the anatomical snuffbox in coronary angiography and intervention. Objective: We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the ultrasound guided distal trans-radial coronary angiography and intervention. Methods: Patients assigned to one operator program underwent diagnostic or procedural intervention through distal trans-radial approach in the anatomical snuffbox between January 2018 and May 2018. All of patients had palpable artery in their distal radial artery. The operator did the coronary procedure via distal radial access at anatomical snuffbox. When the pulse was weak or the target artery was very small, the operator punctured under ultrasound guidance (V-scan with dual probe, GE heathcare, USA) Results: 56 patients were enrolled. Mean age of patients was 65.1 years old and 68% were male. About 70% of patients were presented with stable angina feature. In diagnostic procedure, 4F (3, 5.6%) or 5F (29, 54.7%) sheath was used and we did coronary intervention via 6F (21, 39.6%) Sheath. Ultrasound guided puncture was done for 33 patients (58.9%). Overall Success rate of distal trans-radial angiography and intervention was 94.6% (3 failed cases). Success rate of ultrasound guided procedure was 97% (only 1 failed case). Left distal radial puncture was done for 18 patients (33.9%). 16% of patients had chronic kidney disease, especially end stage renal disease (11%) to preserve radial artery which was potential candidate of arteriovenous fistulae for dialysis. There was no BARC type 2-5 bleeding in hospital stay and follow up at out-patient clinic. Conclusion: Ultra sound guided distal radial approach is feasible and safe as a good alternative technique for coronary angiography and interventions.

P6523Radial artery occlusion: predictors, methods for reducing the frequency of complications-a single center study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Ognerubov ◽  
A Tereshchenko ◽  
E Merkulov ◽  
S Provatorov ◽  
G Arutyunyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Short Time

Abstract Radial access has great advantages in terms of the frequency of complications, but it has one specific complication - radial artery occlusion (RAO). This complication often does not manifest itself in any way; however, it limits the use of access for the future interventions. Aim To compare methods of short and traditional hemostasis and to identify the main predictors of RAO after radial access. Materials and methods During the period from 2012 to 2018, 2000 patients were included in the study, which consisted of two parts: prospective - 1000 patients who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stable coronary artery disease, and retrospective part of the study, which included 1000 patients admitted for PCI from other clinics. In a prospective study, patients were divided into two groups: after coronary angiography and PCI, respectively (n=500 in the coronary angiography group and n=500 in the PCI group), and then randomized. Hemostatic bandages in the first group of patients (n=250) were removed after 12–24 hours, in the second group (n=250) - after 4±1 hours. When the occlusion of the radial artery was detected, all patients underwent an hour-long compression of the ipsilateral ulnar artery to recanalize acute RAO. Results The frequency of RAO in the retrospective part of the study was 21.8%. The frequency of RAO in the prospective part of the study was 10.2% with a traditional time hemostasis and 1.4% with a short-time compression (P<0.001). Predictors of the RAO are illustrated in table 1. Predictors of bleeding were PCI (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01–0.67, P=0.05) and weight (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.18, P=0.01). Table 1. Predictors of RAO Variables Odds ratio 95% Confidential interval Significance, P Traditional-time hemostasis 8.78 4.2–21.5 <0.001 Diabetes mellitus+smoking 18.1 12.7–26.7 <0.001 Diabetes mellitus 0.45 0.25–0.83 0.009 Body mass index 0.95 0.91–0.99 0.02 Male 1.75 1.01–3.18 0.05 Protein C 0,86 0,75–0,96 0,01 Conclusion Careful examination of the patient for detecting RAO before and after interventions is essential. Short hemostasis with compression of the ipsilateral ulnar artery reduce the frequency of RAO. For short-time hemostasis, special attention should be paid to patients after PCI and with low BMI, as far as these factors are associated with a greater risk of bleeding after removal of the compression bandage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document