Abstract 4651: Interaction between outdoor ultraviolet radiation and indoor tanning bed use on skin cancer risk

Author(s):  
Jongeun Rhee ◽  
Tricia Li ◽  
Wen-Qing Li ◽  
Abrar A. Qureshi ◽  
Eunyoung Cho
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Savoye ◽  
Catherine M Olsen ◽  
David C Whiteman ◽  
Anne Bijon ◽  
Lucien Wald ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meg Watson ◽  
Dawn M. Holman ◽  
Maryellen Maguire-Eisen

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 107327481989400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Julian ◽  
Sheryl Thorburn ◽  
G. John Geldhof

Our purpose was to examine the beliefs of college students about UV exposure and sunscreen use and their associations with skin cancer risk and protective behaviors in a cloudy climate. The sample was online survey participants (N = 334) recruited from a large university in Oregon. After fitting an initial measurement model, we fit a structural equation model including Health Beliefs About UV (HBAU) subscales ( Health Benefits of Tanning, Seasonal Effects, Tanning Through the Winter, and Sunscreen Toxicity), outcome variables (sunscreen use, indoor tanning, and outdoor tanning), and covariates (eg, tanning and sunscreen use). A minority of participants held the beliefs represented by 3 HBAU subscales, but beliefs about negative health effects of the local weather ( Tanning Through the Winter) were common. The measurement and adjusted models provided good fit to the data (χ2 = 143.30; P = .29; df = 136; Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation = .014; Comparative Fit Index = .992; Tucker-Lewis Index = .981). After adjusting for covariates, Sunscreen Toxicity predicted reduced sunscreen use (β = −.12, P = .021), Health Benefits of Tanning predicted outdoor tanning (β = .43, P < .001), and Tanning Through the Winter predicted indoor tanning (β = .31, P = .02). The small sample size, nonresponse rate, and cross-sectional nature of this study mean these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Beliefs about health benefits of sun exposure, the regional weather, and sunscreen safety play a role in skin cancer risk and protective behaviors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (7) ◽  
pp. 569-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Stenehjem ◽  
T E Robsahm ◽  
M Bråtveit ◽  
S O Samuelsen ◽  
J Kirkeleit ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy B. Jordan ◽  
Amy Bleakley ◽  
Julia M. Alber ◽  
DeAnn Lazovich ◽  
Karen Glanz

Objectives: Indoor tanning, which is most common among 18-25-year-old white women, increases the risk of skin cancer. To address this problem, we developed and tested messages with a national sample of indoor tanners to determine beliefs that would encourage them to quit. Methods: Messages discouraging indoor tanning using different persuasive themes (skin cancer risk, appearance risk, well-being enhancement) were developed based on formative research and a review of intervention efforts. We conducted an online experiment to test the final messages with a national sample of 480 indoor tanners. Results: Messages that emphasized skin cancer risk out-performed messages that focused on well-being enhancement or damage to appearance in terms of intention to quit indoor tanning. Analyses revealed 2 key mediators: perceived argument strength and beliefs related to the effects of indoor tanning. Conclusions: Theory- and evidence-informed public health communications can contribute to improving health-related behaviors. Focusing on the risk of skin cancer may be the most effective strategy to reduce indoor tanning among young white women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document