scholarly journals Health Beliefs About UV and Skin Cancer Risk Behaviors

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 107327481989400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Julian ◽  
Sheryl Thorburn ◽  
G. John Geldhof

Our purpose was to examine the beliefs of college students about UV exposure and sunscreen use and their associations with skin cancer risk and protective behaviors in a cloudy climate. The sample was online survey participants (N = 334) recruited from a large university in Oregon. After fitting an initial measurement model, we fit a structural equation model including Health Beliefs About UV (HBAU) subscales ( Health Benefits of Tanning, Seasonal Effects, Tanning Through the Winter, and Sunscreen Toxicity), outcome variables (sunscreen use, indoor tanning, and outdoor tanning), and covariates (eg, tanning and sunscreen use). A minority of participants held the beliefs represented by 3 HBAU subscales, but beliefs about negative health effects of the local weather ( Tanning Through the Winter) were common. The measurement and adjusted models provided good fit to the data (χ2 = 143.30; P = .29; df = 136; Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation = .014; Comparative Fit Index = .992; Tucker-Lewis Index = .981). After adjusting for covariates, Sunscreen Toxicity predicted reduced sunscreen use (β = −.12, P = .021), Health Benefits of Tanning predicted outdoor tanning (β = .43, P < .001), and Tanning Through the Winter predicted indoor tanning (β = .31, P = .02). The small sample size, nonresponse rate, and cross-sectional nature of this study mean these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Beliefs about health benefits of sun exposure, the regional weather, and sunscreen safety play a role in skin cancer risk and protective behaviors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-379
Author(s):  
Carolyn J. Heckman ◽  
Melissa V. Auerbach ◽  
Susan Darlow ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Stephanie Raivitch ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1181-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Latrice C. Pichon ◽  
Irma Corral ◽  
Hope Landrine ◽  
Joni A. Mayer ◽  
Denise Adams-Simms

2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
pp. S33
Author(s):  
T.R. Sharma ◽  
V. Yeh ◽  
S. Debanne ◽  
J.S. Bordeaux

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Heckman ◽  
E. Handorf ◽  
S. D. Darlow ◽  
A. L. Yaroch ◽  
S. Raivitch

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 885-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timmie R. Sharma ◽  
Vanessa Yeh ◽  
Sara M. Debanne ◽  
Jeremy S. Bordeaux

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy B. Jordan ◽  
Amy Bleakley ◽  
Julia M. Alber ◽  
DeAnn Lazovich ◽  
Karen Glanz

Objectives: Indoor tanning, which is most common among 18-25-year-old white women, increases the risk of skin cancer. To address this problem, we developed and tested messages with a national sample of indoor tanners to determine beliefs that would encourage them to quit. Methods: Messages discouraging indoor tanning using different persuasive themes (skin cancer risk, appearance risk, well-being enhancement) were developed based on formative research and a review of intervention efforts. We conducted an online experiment to test the final messages with a national sample of 480 indoor tanners. Results: Messages that emphasized skin cancer risk out-performed messages that focused on well-being enhancement or damage to appearance in terms of intention to quit indoor tanning. Analyses revealed 2 key mediators: perceived argument strength and beliefs related to the effects of indoor tanning. Conclusions: Theory- and evidence-informed public health communications can contribute to improving health-related behaviors. Focusing on the risk of skin cancer may be the most effective strategy to reduce indoor tanning among young white women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document