Abstract P3-12-22: Reproducibility of automated coronary artery calcification scoring on radiotherapy treatment planning computed tomography scans of breast cancer patients

Author(s):  
SAM Gernaat ◽  
BD de Vos ◽  
I Isgum ◽  
N Rijnberg ◽  
RM Bijlsma ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqi Xu ◽  
Jiazhou Wang ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Weigang Hu ◽  
Luyi Bu ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Study the impact of abdominal deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique on knowledge-based radiotherapy treatment planning for left-sided breast cancer to guide the application of DIBH radiotherapy technology. Methods and Materials Two kernel density estimation (KDE) models were developed based on 40 left-sided breast cancer patients with two CT acquisitions of free breathing (FB-CT) and DIBH (DIBH-CT). Each KDE model was used to predict DVHs based on DIBH-CT and FB-CT for another 10 new patients similar to our training datasets. The predicted DVHs were taken as a substitute to dose constraints and objective functions in the Eclipse treatment planning system, with the same requirements for the planning target volume (PTV). The mean doses to the heart, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) and the ipsilateral lung were evaluated and compared using the T-test among clinical plans, KDE predictions, and KDE plans.Results Our study demonstrated that the KDE model can generate deliverable simulations equivalent to clinically applicable plans. The T-test was applied to test the consistency hypothesis on another 10 left-sided breast cancer patients. In cases of the same breathing status, there was no statistically significant difference between the predicted and the clinical plans for all clinically relevant dose volume histogram (DVH) indices (p>0.05), and all predicted DVHs can be transferred into deliverable plans. For DIBH-CT images, significant differences were observed in Dmean between FB model predictions and the clinical plans (p<0.05). DIBH model prediction cannot be optimized to a deliverable plan based on FB-CT, with a counsel of perfection. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the KDE prediction results were well fitted for the same breathing condition but degrade with different breathing conditions. The benefits of DIBH can be evaluated quickly and effectively by the specific knowledge-based treatment planning for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. This study will help to further realize the goal of automatic treatment planning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Piotr Kędzierawski ◽  
Krzysztof Buliński ◽  
Tomasz Kuszewski ◽  
Katarzyna Wnuk ◽  
Andrzej Dąbrowski ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abu Rmilah ◽  
N.A Anevakar ◽  
H.A Jouni ◽  
G.R Lin ◽  
N.A Laack ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is associated with and identifies patients at higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of cancer patients with CAC on CT before or after chest radiation therapy (RT) are not well addressed. Methods Retrospective cohort study of all breast cancer patients who underwent chest RT at Mayo Clinic Rochester in 2010. All pre-RT CTs were reviewed and the extent of CAC was recorded in addition to history of pre-RT atherosclerotic risk factors (hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and smoking), history of pre-RT cardiovascular disease (CVD), and RT dosage. MACE (sudden cardiac death (SCD), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and stroke), and CAC progression in follow-up were recorded. CAC extent was quantified before and on 5-year follow-up CT scan in all patients, and a positive change was considered progression. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of CAC before RT: present (group 1) or absent (group 2). Results Our cohort was comprised of 244 breast cancer patients who received chest RT. A total of 39 patients (16.9%) had evidence of CAC on CT prior to RT. Compared with patients without CAC before RT (n=205), those with CAC before RT were found to be older (71.8±7.7 vs 58.9±11.3, p&lt;0.01), had higher pre-RT history of HTN (84.6% vs 47.8%); p&lt;0.01), DM (20.5% vs 4.4%; p&lt;0.01), dyslipidemia (74.2% vs 40%; p&lt;0.01), CAD (23.1% vs 3.9%; p&lt;0.01), and stroke (7.69% vs 1.45%; p=0.04). Following RT, patients in group 1 were more likely to exhibit ACS (33.3% vs 2.9%; p&lt;0.01), and stroke (22.6% vs 5.2%; p&lt;0.01). Multinomial logistic regression identified pre-RT CAD pre-RT CAC (β=1.01 (0.33–1.69), OR=7.60 (1.93–29.93); p=0.02) pre-RT CAD (β=0.78 (0.06–1.49), OR=4.74 (1.14–19.74); p=0.03) as independent predictors for the development of MACE after RT. Progression in CAC after RT was found in 61.9% of all patients (13/21) who developed MACE. Conclusion MACE in breast cancer patients undergoing RT can be predicted before RT based on the CV risk factor and disease profile. The strongest predictor for MACE, however, is evidence of CAC before RT. These data provide a unique window for the identification and follow-up of breast cancer RT patients who have a risk of MACE. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document