Amplitudes of Visually Evoked Cortical Responses due to Full-Field Stimulation and to Stimulation with Four Half-Fields

1991 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Orban ◽  
Winfried Müller
2021 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Ashim Dey ◽  
Andrew J. Zele ◽  
Beatrix Feigl ◽  
Prakash Adhikari

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald M. Hansen ◽  
Anne B. Fulton

AbstractDark-adapted adults' electroretinographic b−wave thresholds are —2 log units below a−wave thresholds and ~3 log units above the perceptual threshold, and their perceptual and the visually evoked cortical potential (VEP) thresholds are similar. Dark-adapted infants' scotopic a− and b−wave thresholds for full-field stimuli are both about 0.5 log units above those of adults, but their scotopic VEP thresholds for such stimuli have not been studied. We obtained scotopic VEP thresholds for brief, full-field stimuli from dark-adapted, infants and adults to consider the relationships of the cortical responses to the responses of more distal structures, namely the rod photoreceptors (scotopic a−wave) and ON-bipolars (scotopic b−wave). The median VEP threshold of infants is 0.5 log unit above that of adults. Thus, the relationships of a− and b−wave and VEP thresholds in infants are similar to those in adults. These results are consistent with rod cell immaturities being the primary determinant of the difference between infants' and adults' thresholds.


2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
BOTIR T. SAGDULLAEV ◽  
MAUREEN A. MCCALL

The receptive field (RF) of most retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is comprised of an excitatory center and an antagonistic surround. Interactions between these RF elements shape most of the visual responses of RGCs. To begin to investigate center-surround interactions of mouse RGCs quantitatively, we characterized their responses in anin vivopreparation to a variety of spot and full-field stimuli. When RGCs were stimulated with a spot that matched the cell's RF center diameter (optimal spot), all RGCs could be categorized as either ON- or OFF-center. In all RGCs, full-field stimulation significantly reduced both the peak and the mean firing rates evoked with an optimal spot stimulus. Full-field stimulation revealed differences in other response properties between ON- and OFF-center RGCs. With a full-field stimulus, the duration of the OFF-center RGCs response was reduced making them more transient, while the duration of the ON-center RGCs increased making them more sustained. Of most interest, full-field stimulation altered the RF center response sign in approximately half of the OFF-center RGCs, which became either OFF/ON or ON only. In contrast, all ON-center and the other OFF-center cells conserved their RF response sign in the presence of the full-field stimulus. We propose that sign-altering OFF-center RGCs possess an additional RF surround mechanism that underlies this alteration in their response. Of general interest these results suggest that the sole use of full-field stimulation to categorize visual response properties of RGCs does not adequately reflect their RF organization and, therefore, is not an optimal strategy for their classification.


2008 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S103
Author(s):  
Ferah Kizilay ◽  
Hulya Aydin Gungor ◽  
Berrin Aktekin ◽  
Yesim Senol ◽  
Sibel Ozkaynak

Author(s):  
S. Andrietti ◽  
M. Bernacki ◽  
N. Bozzolo ◽  
L. Maire ◽  
P. De Micheli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document