Cholesteatoma Surgery; Transcanal Approach

Author(s):  
N. Shah
ORL ro ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (48) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
E.H. Ştefănescu ◽  
A.H. Marin ◽  
N.C. Balica ◽  
C.I. Doroş ◽  
Delia Horhat ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Man Wah Yung

AbstractThe existence of blind pockets in the middle ear during cholesteatoma surgery could compromise complete removal of the disease, e.g. from the sinus tympanum. The use of side-viewing rigid endoscopes in conjunction with the operating microscope to control and facilitate cholesteatoma removal during mastoid operation studied.Ninety-two primary operations for cholesteatoma over a four-year period were examined. Over one-third (35.9 per cent) of these cases had cholesteatoma extended into the sinus tympanum. Sixty-four operations were small cavity mastoidectomy. The others were either canal wall reconstruction or primary obliteration following open cavity mastoidectomy.Although residual cholesteatoma was found in three patients, only one was in the middle ear. It is concluded from this study that side-viewing endoscopes could be very useful in cholesteatoma surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 274 (2) ◽  
pp. 773-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sultan Şevik Eliçora ◽  
Duygu Erdem ◽  
Aykut Erdem Dinç ◽  
Murat Damar ◽  
Sultan Bişkin

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S3) ◽  
pp. S93-S93
Author(s):  
Willem Berkovits ◽  
Michele Costa ◽  
Pim de Graaf ◽  
Erik Hensen ◽  
Frits Smit ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94S-99S
Author(s):  
Kimberley Lau ◽  
Marios Stavrakas ◽  
Mark Yardley ◽  
Jaydip Ray

Objectives: The mainstay of cholesteatoma treatment is surgical and requires the removal of all squamous epithelium from the underlying normal structure. The application of laser technology in middle ear and mastoid surgery has shown promise in achieving both disease eradication and hearing preservation. This systematic review aims to include studies that have assessed the application of laser to the treatment of cholesteatoma and to review its outcomes in terms of disease eradication as well as hearing results. Method: Two independent researchers conducted a systematic review of the literature on MEDLINE and Cochrane library, according to PRISMA guidance. Result: The search resulted in 12 papers, reporting on 536 participants that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The hearing results did not show that using laser surgery improved hearing in cholesteatoma surgery, but neither has the use of laser shown to deteriorate hearing. With regards to the prevention of residual/recurrent cholesteatoma, the current literature reports a residual/recurrent rate of 0% to 33%. The complication rate of facial palsy is 0.6%. Conclusion: While there is certainly a role for future studies especially randomised large-cohort prospective comparative studies, the current literature suggests that laser may have a role in prevention or minimizing of residual cholesteatoma and generally have a safe hearing outcome profile.


2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 2867-2871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Bennett ◽  
George Wanna ◽  
David Francis ◽  
Jack Murfee ◽  
Brendan O'Connell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document