scholarly journals Evolving Views on the Pallium

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Loreta Medina ◽  
Antonio Abellán ◽  
Ester Desfilis

The pallium is the largest part of the telencephalon in amniotes, and comparison of its subdivisions across species has been extremely difficult and controversial due to its high divergence. Comparative embryonic genoarchitecture studies have greatly contributed to propose models of pallial fundamental divisions, which can be compared across species and be used to extract general organizing principles as well as to ask more focused and insightful research questions. The use of these models is crucial to discern between conservation, convergence or divergence in the neural populations and networks found in the pallium. Here we provide a critical review of the models proposed using this approach, including tetrapartite, hexapartite and double-ring models, and compare them to other models. While recognizing the power of these models for understanding brain architecture, development and evolution, we also highlight limitations and comment on aspects that require attention for improvement. We also discuss on the use of transcriptomic data for understanding pallial evolution and advise for better contextualization of these data by discerning between gene regulatory networks involved in the generation of specific units and cell populations versus genes expressed later, many of which are activity dependent and their expression is more likely subjected to convergent evolution.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben J. Vincent ◽  
Gavin R. Rice ◽  
Gabriella M. Wong ◽  
William J. Glassford ◽  
Kayla I. Downs ◽  
...  

AbstractDuring development, transcription factors and signaling molecules govern gene regulatory networks to direct the formation of unique morphologies. As changes in gene regulatory networks are often implicated in morphological evolution, mapping transcription factor landscapes is important, especially in tissues that undergo rapid evolutionary change. The terminalia (genital and anal structures) of Drosophila melanogaster and its close relatives exhibit dramatic changes in morphology between species. While previous studies have found network components important for patterning the larval genital disc, the networks governing adult structures during pupal development have remained uncharted. Here, we performed RNA-seq in whole Drosophila melanogaster terminalia followed by in situ hybridization for 100 highly expressed transcription factors during pupal development. We find that the terminalia is highly patterned during pupal stages and that specific transcription factors mark separate structures and substructures. Our results are housed online in a searchable database (flyterminalia.pitt.edu) where they can serve as a resource for the community. This work lays a foundation for future investigations into the gene regulatory networks governing the development and evolution of Drosophila terminalia.SummaryWe performed RNA-seq in whole Drosophila melanogaster terminalia (genitalia and analia) followed by in situ hybridization for 100 highly expressed transcription factors during pupal development. We find that the pupal terminalia is highly patterned with specific transcription factors marking separate structures and substructures. Our results are housed online in a searchable database (flyterminalia.pitt.edu) where they can serve as a resource for the community. This work lays a foundation for future investigations into the gene regulatory networks governing the development and evolution of Drosophila terminalia.


Genetics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 192 (3) ◽  
pp. 1133-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Lipovich ◽  
Fabien Dachet ◽  
Juan Cai ◽  
Shruti Bagla ◽  
Karina Balan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-148
Author(s):  
Frank Emmert-Streib ◽  
Matthias Dehmer

Causal networks, e.g., gene regulatory networks (GRNs) inferred from gene expression data, contain a wealth of information but are defying simple, straightforward and low-budget experimental validations. In this paper, we elaborate on this problem and discuss distinctions between biological and clinical validations. As a result, validation differences for GRNs reflect known differences between basic biological and clinical research questions making the validations context specific. Hence, the meaning of biologically and clinically meaningful GRNs can be very different. For a concerted approach to a problem of this size, we suggest the establishment of the HUMAN GENE REGULATORY NETWORK PROJECT which provides the information required for biological and clinical validations alike.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document