scholarly journals Covid-19 Impact on Macular Neovascularization and Retinal Vein Occlusion Treatment: Single-Center Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 145-152
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Vilares-Morgado ◽  
Carolina Madeira ◽  
Ana Maria Cunha ◽  
Manuel Falcão ◽  
João Beato ◽  
...  

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in undertreatment and subsequent loss of visual acuity (VA) in patients with macular neovascularization (MNV) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) regularly treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Single-center, retrospective study of patients scheduled for treatment between March 19 and June 1, 2020, the national mandatory quarantine period. Patients’ demographics, VA, and scheduled treatment during this period were reviewed via medical records. All patients were analyzed regarding treatment attendance rates. The visual impact of COVID-19 was assessed in patients who had been treated and presented a stable VA for &#x3e;6 months before the beginning of the quarantine. <b><i>Results:</i></b> This study included 927 eyes from 769 patients. The attendance rate increased throughout the study timeframe (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and correlated negatively with higher patient’s age (<i>r</i> = −0.142; <i>p</i> = 0.005). Patients with age-related macular degeneration (67.6%) had lower attendance rates (<i>p</i> = 0.007) and were older (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The visual impact analysis included 400 eyes from 325 patients. The average VA variation throughout this period was −1.7 ± 8.4 ETDRS letters and was similar in different retinal pathologies (<i>p</i> = 0.334). VA variation did not correlate with the number of missed treatments per patient (<i>r</i> = 0.100; <i>p</i> = 0.150). The prevalence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, as well as central retinal thickness decreased significantly throughout the study period (<i>p</i> values of &#x3c;0.001, &#x3c;0.001, and 0.032, respectively). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the attendance rate of patients with MNV or RVO to their scheduled treatments, which was higher in the first week of mandatory quarantine. Nevertheless, VA did not decrease significantly during this period, with a limited VA variation regardless of primary retinal disorder and morphological parameters even improved in the eyes included in the visual impact analysis.

Retina ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy L. Jackson ◽  
Elena Nicod ◽  
Aris Angelis ◽  
Federico Grimaccia ◽  
A. Toby Prevost ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-317416
Author(s):  
Martin Michl ◽  
Maria Fabianska ◽  
Philipp Seeböck ◽  
Amir Sadeghipour ◽  
Bilal Haj Najeeb ◽  
...  

AimTo objectively assess disease activity and treatment response in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO), neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and centre-involved diabetic macular oedema (DME), using artificial intelligence–based fluid quantification.MethodsPosthoc analysis of 2311 patients (11 151 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography volumes) from five clinical, multicentre trials, who received a flexible antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy over a 12-month period. Fluid volumes were measured with a deep learning algorithm at baseline/months 1, 2, 3 and 12, for three concentric circles with diameters of 1, 3 and 6 mm (fovea, paracentral ring and pericentral ring), as well as four sectors surrounding the fovea (superior, nasal, inferior and temporal).ResultsIn each disease, at every timepoint, most intraretinal fluid (IRF) per square millimetre was present at the fovea, followed by the paracentral ring and pericentral ring (p<0.0001). While this was also the case for subretinal fluid (SRF) in RVO/DME (p<0.0001), patients with nAMD showed more SRF in the paracentral ring than at the fovea up to month 3 (p<0.0001). Between sectors, patients with RVO/DME showed the highest IRF volumes temporally (p<0.001/p<0.0001). In each disease, more SRF was consistently found inferiorly than superiorly (p<0.02). At month 1/12, we measured the following median reductions of initial fluid volumes. For IRF: RVO, 95.9%/97.7%; nAMD, 91.3%/92.8%; DME, 37.3%/69.9%. For SRF: RVO, 94.7%/97.5%; nAMD, 98.4%/99.8%; DME, 86.3%/97.5%.ConclusionFully automated localisation and quantification of IRF/SRF over time shed light on the fluid dynamics in each disease. There is a specific anatomical response of IRF/SRF to anti-VEGF therapy in all diseases studied.


2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-317337
Author(s):  
Thomas Ciulla ◽  
John S Pollack ◽  
David F Williams

Background/AimsTo assess visual acuity (VA) outcomes and antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy intensity in retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-related macular oedema (ME).MethodsA retrospective study was completed in treatment-naïve patients with RVO-related ME from 2013 to 2019, using the Vestrum Health Retina Database.ResultsMean baseline age was 72.4 years and 54% were women. In 6 months, in 8876 eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-related ME, after a mean of 4.5 anti-VEGF injections, VA increased by 9.4 letters (95% confidence interval (CI) for change in VA +8.94 to +9.78, p<0.001) from a baseline of 55.1 letters. In 6737 eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)-related ME, after a mean of 4.6 anti-VEGF injections over 6 months, VA improved by 9.2 letters (95% CI +8.50 to +9.87, p<0.001) from a baseline of 37.2 letters. In 1 year, VA gain was similar (BRVO: 7.4 injections, +8.1 letters, 95% CI +7.55 to +8.57, p<0.001; CRVO: 7.6 injections, +7.1 letters, 95% CI +6.31 to +7.95, p<0.001). In 6 months and 1 year, mean letters gain increased with number of anti-VEGF injections. Patient eyes with baseline VA of 20/40 or better tended to lose VA in 1 year.ConclusionMean change in VA correlates with treatment intensity, but patients with better VA at presentation are susceptible to vision loss, reflecting a ceiling effect. Assessed with the same database, VA gains compare favourably with 1-year VA gains in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic ME, but exhibit a larger gap when compared with corresponding randomised controlled trials.


Author(s):  
LK Moshetova ◽  
SA Usharova ◽  
KI Turkina ◽  
DA Sychev ◽  
IN Saburina

Since the discovery of microRNAs just a few decades ago, our knowledge of these molecules and their potential as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets has significantly expanded. There is an ongoing discussion in the scientific community about the possibility of using microRNA for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. It has been shown recently that levels of some microRNAs vary in vascular eye disorders, such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. However, despite serious advances in our understanding of microRNA’s role in eye pathology, we still do not know whether it is possible to use microRNA as a biomarker for central retinal vein occlusion. Perhaps, the discovery of such candidate microRNAs will help in making the timely diagnosis and improve the quality of medical care in patients with retinal vein occlusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document