scholarly journals SIGNIFICANCE OF LOW MATERNAL SERUM Β-HCG LEVELS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF ATYPICAL CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES

Author(s):  
Robin Wijngaard ◽  
Elena Casals ◽  
Imma Mercadé ◽  
Javier Laguna ◽  
Irene Madrigal ◽  
...  

Introduction: The introduction of prenatal cell-free DNA as a screening test has surpassed traditional combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) in the detection of common trisomies. However, its current limitation in detecting only common trisomies is affecting the diagnostic yield for other clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. Methods: In efforts to optimize the detection of fetuses with genetic abnormalities, we have analyzed the relationship between the cFTS risk score and biomarkers with atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Furthermore, we have evaluated the impact of prenatal cell-free DNA screening on the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in our population. For these purposes, we performed a retrospective study of 877 singleton pregnancies who underwent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) between 2013 to 2020 and for whom first-trimester screening data were available. Results: The results demonstrated that low levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) (≤ 0.37 MoM) and increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT) (≥ 3.5mm) were statistically associated with the presence of atypical chromosomal abnormalities. In fact, the risk of pathogenic CMA results increased from 6% to 10% when fetal NT was increased and from 6% to 20% when a low serum β-hCG level was detected in the high-risk cFTS group. Moreover, our results showed that altered serum levels of β-hCG can have a substantial impact on the early detection of clinically relevant copy number variants. Discussion/Conclusion: Traditional cFTS can potentially identify a substantial proportion of atypical chromosomal aberrations, and women with increased NT or low maternal serum β-hCG levels are at increased risk of having pathogenic CMA results. Our results may help clinicians and women decide whether invasive testing or prenatal cell-free DNA screening testing are more appropriate for each situation.

Author(s):  
Ashley N. Battarbee ◽  
Neeta L. Vora

In a prospective, multicenter blinded study at 35 international centers, the Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy (NEXT) study evaluated the performance of cell-free DNA screening for fetal trisomy compared to standard first trimester screening with nuchal translucency and serum analytes in a routine prenatal population. Among the 15,841 women who had standard screening and cell-free DNA analysis with neonatal outcome data, there were 68 chromosomal abnormalities (1 in 236). Of these, 38 were Trisomy 21 (1 in 417). Cell-free DNA analysis had a higher area under the curve (AUC) for trisomy 21, compared to standard screening (0.999 vs. 0.958, p = 0.001). Cell-free DNA analysis also had greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to standard screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. While cell-free DNA analysis cannot detect all chromosome abnormalities, it performed better than standard screening for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in a routine population including low- and high-risk women.


2016 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. S326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arin Buresch ◽  
Mara Rosner ◽  
Barrie Suskin ◽  
Francine Einstein ◽  
Emnonila Bircaj ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ioan Suciu ◽  
Slavyana Galeva ◽  
Samira Abdel Azim ◽  
Lucian Pop ◽  
Oana Toader

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (s1) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
B. Deloison ◽  
F. Muller ◽  
S. Dreux ◽  
I. Czerkiewicz ◽  
D. Sokolov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1482-1488
Author(s):  
Sonia Migliorini ◽  
Gabriele Saccone ◽  
Fiora Silvestro ◽  
Giulia Massaro ◽  
Bruno Arduino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document