The use of rFVIIa in non-haemophilia bleeding conditions in paediatrics

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 738-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasad Mathew

SummaryFrom its original envisioned use in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors, recombinant factor VIIa has been increasingly used in a variety of non-hemophilia bleeding/hemorrhagic situations with great efficacy. Most of the reported work has been in adult patients. This paper sets out to review its use in the pediatric non-hemophilia patients and the varied conditions it has been tried and used. Most of the published literature has shown that this agent is efficacious, safe and can be used as an adjunctive measure in the achievement of hemostasis. However, most of the published work is mainly anecdotal, case reports or small series. Randomized trials in children are eagerly awaited.

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148
Author(s):  
Louise Rose

Uncontrolled bleeding and coagulopathy are associated with trauma, liver failure, obstetric conditions, and a variety of surgical circumstances, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in the critically ill. Recently, the role of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in the management of uncontrolled bleeding has attracted interest. rFVIIa was initially developed (and licensed) for the treatment of hemophilia. Increasingly, evidence suggests rFVIIa causes cessation of bleeding, improves coagulation markers, and reduces blood product use for treatment of severe bleeding due to other causes. The majority of evidence for nonlicensed use of rFVIIa consists of case reports. Recently, the first randomized controlled trial of rFVIIa in trauma patients reported a significant reduction in red blood cell transfusion, and a trend toward reduced mortality and critical complications. As evidence builds to support the use of rFVIIa, nurses need to be aware of the administration and safety issues of this treatment.


2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan M Stachnik ◽  
Michael P Gabay

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical information related to the use of continuous infusion factor products in patients with hemophilia. Specifically, case reports and open-label trials are summarized involving the use of factor VIII and recombinant factor VIIa for a variety of indications including surgical prophylaxis, acute bleeding, primary prevention, and management of inhibitors. In addition, issues surrounding the use of continuous infusion of factor products such as pharmacokinetic rationale, stability/sterility, and cost are reviewed. DATA SOURCES: Primary and review articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1990–June 2001) and through secondary sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data concerning the administration of factor products are primarily detailed in open-label trials and case reports. Comparisons between intermittent bolus injections and continuous infusion of factor products are limited and primarily compare continuous infusion regimens with historical controls. The rationale behind the continuous-infusion approach is linked to the pharmacokinetics of factor products administered via this route. Pharmacokinetic data reveal that, with continuous infusion of factor products, a reduction in clearance and a maintenance of factor serum concentrations are noted. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of factor products (factor VIII and recombinant factor VIIa) via continuous infusion has produced favorable hemostatic effects compared with intermittent bolus injections. The advantages of continuous infusion include maintenance of a constant factor concentration, thereby reducing risk of bleeding from excessively low trough concentrations, and a decrease in factor consumption related to a reduction in factor clearance with constant infusion. Manufacturers recommend using reconstituted factor products either immediately or within 1–3 hours after reconstitution; however, several studies have found the products to be stable and sterile for longer periods.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 810-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Kaburaki ◽  
Takumi Taniguchi ◽  
Wataru Omi ◽  
Hirosi Ito ◽  
Keisuke Ota ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4508-4508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig M. Kessler ◽  
Joan Cox Gill ◽  
Caitlyn T. Wilke ◽  
David L. Cooper ◽  

Abstract In 1999, recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa, NovoSeven®) received FDA approval with recommended dosing of 90 mcg/kg every 2 hours. Individual case reports and small series have described the use of rFVIIa at doses ≥ 270 mcg/kg and 3 randomized trials have suggested that one bolus dose of rFVIIa at 270 mcg/kg provides equivalent efficacy and safety when compared to the conventional regimen of three doses of 90 mcg/kg over 6 hrs. The extent to which higher doses of rFVIIa have been used in clinical practice in the US is unknown. The HTRS registry records data regarding the treatment of acute bleeding episodes in those with hemophilia A or B and related hemorrhagic disorders with special emphasis on outcomes in individuals with congenital hemophilia complicated by alloantibody inhibitors; From over 5,000 evaluable bleeding episodes reported between January 2004 and March 2008, all episodes treated with at least one dose of ≥ 250 mcg/kg rFVIIa were examined for their initial and total dose, number of doses, and number of days on rFVIIa therapy. The efficacy of two treatment regimens was assessed: an initial high dose ≥250 mcg/kg followed by “as needed” lower doses; some of these only required a single high dose; and initial smaller doses of rFVIIa or aPCC followed by a≥250 mcg/kg dose for salvage. Of 2,532 bleeds treated with rFVIIa, 153 bleeds treated with at least one dose ≥ 250 mcg/kg were reported in 21 individuals with either congenital hemophilia A (n=17) or B (n=4) with alloantibody inhibitors. These 153 bleeding episodes required 1642 doses of rFVIIa of which 358 doses were ≥ 250 mcg/kg. The mean patient age was 12.6 years (0.9– 41.7 years). Mean titers of anti-FVIII and anti-FIX alloantibodies were 104.6 BU (0–683) and 0.9 BU (0–5.6), respectively. Bleed sites were in joints (102 bleeds, 67%), muscles (31 bleeds, 20%), mucosal surfaces (7 bleeds, 5%), and subcutaneous areas (6 bleeds, 4%). Bleeds were treated mainly in the home (78%). Of 153 bleeding episodes treated with at least one dose ≥ 250 mcg/kg rFVIIa, 80 had at least one dose ≥ 270 mcg/kg, and 49 had at least one dose ≥ 300 mcg/kg. For the whole group, mean (median, range) total dose was 1835 (867, 250–27323) mcg/kg with 10.4 (4, 1–201) doses over 3.8 (2.0, 1–79) days. Half of the doses received for these bleeds were ≥ 250 mcg/kg, and 79.1% had an initial dose of ≥ 250 mcg/kg. For those receiving a dose of ≥250 mcg/kg, there were 14.5 (4, 1–157) doses prior to the dose of ≥ 250 mcg/kg. Efficacy was 90% in 147 bleeds where rFVIIa was used as primary treatment and 100% in 6 bleeds where rFVIIa was used after a mean 154 U/kg (2.0 doses) of aPCC. Efficacy was 90% for joint bleeds and 94% for muscle bleeds. There were 15 episodes of presumed efficacy where documentation did not indicate bleeding stopped, but no other medications were recorded, resulting in adjusted overall efficacy of 100%. There were 9 patients with 23 bleeding episodes treated with a single dose of ≥ 250 mcg/kg, including mostly joint bleeds (10 spontaneous, 7 traumatic), and mostly home treatment (21). Dosing was 307 ± 62.1 (300, 250–500) mcg/kg and in 91% physicians reported “bleeding stopped” (remaining 2 had no other doses or medications). Cumulative exposure in this group was 157 doses of 250–269 mcg/kg, 70 doses of 270–299 mcg/kg, and 131 of 300–500 mcg/kg. There were no serious adverse drug related events or thrombotic complications reported after treatment of these bleeding episodes. The 2004–2008 data from HTRS provides the largest single source of data on the safety and efficacy of higher doses of rFVIIa administered to reverse moderate to severe bleeds in a broad cohort of inhibitor patients with hemophilia. Efficacy was consistent for both intra-articular or muscle bleeds in a home setting and rFVIIa was an effective single hemostatic agent in this context so the administration of additional replacement products was unnecessary. Importantly, rFVIIa ≥250 mcg/kg was not associated with any serious adverse drug reactions or thrombogenicity. These data support the feasibility of an initial high dose of rFVIIa for treatment of bleeds in inhibitor patients and justifies the conduct of a prospective, randomized clinical trial to confirm these observations.


Hematology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (1) ◽  
pp. 426-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Keith Hoots

Abstract Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was developed in the early 1990s to provide “bypassing” hemostatic therapy for hemophilia A and B patients with inhibitors. More recently, it has been licensed for use in patients with inherited deficiency of factor VII. Since it was licensed for use in hemophilia with inhibitors in the US, Europe, and other countries for these specific indications, it has been used selectively but in a wide array of clinical settings for uncontrolled hemorrhage in individuals without an inherited bleeding disorder. Many of these uses have been described in the medical literature as case reports or small, uncontrolled series. Several randomized clinical trials (RCT) for these “off-label” medical uses have been published in recent months and will serve as the focus of this review. In particular, a review of an RCT for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage that has demonstrated clinical efficacy in reducing both mortality and volume of central nervous system hemorrhage will be offered. A brief discussion of hypothesized physiologic mechanisms of supraphysiologic doses of rFVIIa will introduce the clinical discussion of these broad off-label uses. Since rFVIIa is a very expensive therapy, possible strategies for optimizing its use in the these settings will be presented.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4143-4143
Author(s):  
Mariam L. Abdullatif ◽  
Elizabeth Donnachie ◽  
Miguel Escobar

Abstract Commonly used anticoagulants and anti-platelet agents have the potential drawback of bleeding complications and some lack an antidote for their quick reversal. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) has recently been suggested as a general hemostatic agent but its use has only been approved for hemophiliacs with inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in-vitro ability of rFVIIa to reverse the effects of the following anticoagulant and/or anti-platelet agents: aspirin/plavix (n=12), heparin/aspirin/plavix (n=10), and coumadin (n=10). The criteria for patient selection were as follows: adult patients receiving coumadin; INR≥2, adult patients receiving heparin; aPTT≥ 50 seconds. After IRB approval and informed consent, blood was collected from patients receiving these medications and the effects of rFVIIa were studied using the thrombin generation assay and rotational thromboelastography (RoTEG®). Primary hemostasis in whole blood was assessed using the Multiplate® platelet analyzer following stimulation with collagen (final concentration was 3.2 μg/ml). Patients in the aspirin/plavix and heparin/aspirin/plavix groups, but not the coumadin group, had significantly decreased platelet activation compared to the control group. In platelet-poor plasma, the lagtime for thrombin generation was increased in all patient groups receiving anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents but the time-to-peak thrombin concentration was increased only in the heparin/ASA/plavix and coumadin goups. The addition of rFVIIa (2 and 6 μg/ml) shortened the lagtime in all patient groups so that it was not significantly different from controls. In the coumadin group, the time-to-peak thrombin concentration was reversed with rFVIIa at 2 μg/ml but was not reversed in the heparin/aspirin/plavix group even at 6 μg/ml. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was decreased only in patients receiving coumadin and could not be reversed at the highest concentration of rFVIIa (6 μg/ml). In whole-blood thromboelastography, the clotting time (CT) in the heparin/aspirin/plavix and coumadin groups were increased compared to controls. Addition of rFVIIa (6 ug/ml) reversed this anticoagulant effect in the coumadin group but not the heparin/aspirin/plavix group. The mean clot firmness (MCF) was decreased only in the heparin/aspirin/plavix group and addition of rFVIIa (6 ug/ml) reversed this effect. Although the number of patients collected in the heparin/aspirin /plavix group was 10, only 4 could be used in the final analysis for thrombin generation and thromboelastography since those with aPTTs>85 seconds did not achieve a CT nor did they generate sufficient thrombin to be evaluated in the allotted time (30 minutes for thromboelastography and 90 minutes for thrombin generation) The in vitro addition of rFVIIa (2 and 6 μg/ml) did not reverse this effect. This study shows that rFVIIa accelerates thrombin generation and CT, but does not completely reverse the effects of these agents on thrombin generation and thromboelastography.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document