The current tendency towards the silvicultural promotion of mixed tree species has increased the variability in the crown structure within stands. This study shows how neighbouring trees can influence both the external crown features and internal wood properties of trees. Using terrestrial laser scanning, the crown features of 100 European beech trees, <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> L., from pure beech stands and mixed stands of beech with Douglas fir, Norway spruce, sessile oak and Scots pine were recorded. After felling and sawing, the dynamic modulus of elasticity was determined on 1623 boards from the two lower 4.1-m logs. Significant differences were found between beech trees from pure stands and those from beech–pine mixed stands in terms of crown volume (415 m<sup>3</sup> vs 766 m<sup>3</sup>), crown ratio (50.0% vs 71.5%), crown projection ratio (0.182 m cm<sup>−1</sup> vs 0.253 m cm<sup>−1</sup>) and branch angle (30.7° vs 54.1°). Multiple regression mixed models revealed significant relationships between timber stiffness and crown volume (-1.7 N mm<sup>−2</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>), crown ratio (-28.4 N mm<sup>−2</sup> %<sup>−1</sup>) and crown projection area (-9835 N mm<sup>−2</sup> m<sup>−1</sup> cm). Thus, the crown morphology of broad-leaved species reflects the tree’s long-term competitive status and suggests indicators for the assessment of mechanical–physical wood properties.
A STUDY ON TEE CROWN MORPHOLOGY IN HUMAN PERMANENT MOLARS AND THE SECOND MILK MOLARS : Second Part Crown Morphology in The Teeth of Lower Jaw
