Abstract P33: Improving Heart Failure Metrics: A Multidisciplinary Team Approach

Author(s):  
Brittany L Cunningham ◽  
Zachary L Cox ◽  
Connie M Lewis ◽  
Daniel Lenihan

Background: Quality of care has become a priority as heart failure (HF) core measures and readmission have been publically reported on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare website. In an effort to decrease readmissions Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) joined the H2H (Hospital to Home) initiative. Based on the CMS data for 2005 to 2008 the middle Tennessee region was in the 5 th Quartile of readmission scores (25.2%-29.0%). The 30-day HF readmission rate at VUMC (25.7%) was comparable to the national rate of 24.5%. Aim: The goal of this project was to decrease readmissions by 20% as suggested by the ACC through participation with the H2H initiative. Method: A multidisciplinary team, including Physicians, Pharmacist, Case Management, Nutrition, Nursing, and a Social Worker, was structured to round on the heart failure floor each morning to identify HF patients as part of a demonstration project. All identified patients were assessed by the multidisciplinary team for teaching needs and self care abilities based on their specialties. Based on their initial assessment, teaching was performed for newly diagnosed or reinforcement teaching. Education materials were updated for all patients and given to all heart failure patients regardless of status in the demonstration project. Results: Thirty day follow-up has been completed on 52 patients and 7 have been readmitted for any cause. This has decreased the readmission rate from 25.7% to 13.4%. There are 5 interventions which could have been completed. The most frequent, the Pharmacy intervention was completed on 76% of the patients; however there is not a statistical correlation between this intervention alone and readmission. Discharge instructions in core measures were also associated with a positive trend as evidence by quarter 4 2009 at 88.4% and quarter 4 2010 at 96.8%. Conclusions: Our project targeted recognizing the needs of the patient and matching them with the appropriate consult. This approach has been associated with reduction in readmission rates and in an increase in core measure compliance. Further data collection will be needed to confirm findings.

Author(s):  
Laura L. Cord ◽  
Veena Rajpal ◽  
Nancy Pearl Solomon

Purpose At Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, service members (SMs) with polytraumatic injuries, usually resulting from blast explosions, are routinely referred to the Speech Pathology Clinic for evaluation of swallowing function. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to advance the speech-language pathologist's (SLP) knowledge of polytrauma and to improve the care of individuals with traumatic injuries, especially related to nutrition and swallowing within a larger multidisciplinary team approach. Case Report Previous research within our center identified common demographic and injury characteristics of SMs with combat-related injuries that led to referrals for swallowing evaluation. An SM with polytraumatic injuries was selected for this case report to illustrate the relevance of the research findings and also the importance of multidisciplinary team support to appropriately manage such complex cases. Evaluations and relevant treatments are described across a 3-month acute care hospitalization, including swallowing and nutritional recommendations at the time of each swallowing evaluation. Discussion Comparisons of polytrauma cases at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center with literature from civilian trauma centers revealed somewhat longer hospitalizations and the particular influence of maxillofacial trauma on dysphagia outcomes. The complex case reported in this article illustrates the importance of multidisciplinary care and coordination, with particular emphasis on the intersecting roles of the SLP and registered dietitian. This report can serve as a guide for SLPs working in trauma settings for developing prognostic statements, treatment plans, and multidisciplinary interaction.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Anecita P. Fadol ◽  
Jean-Bernard Durand ◽  
Barbara L. Summers ◽  
Myrshia L. Woods ◽  
Katie Lewis ◽  
...  

123 Background: Heart failure (HF) is a clinical problem of emerging importance in cancer care. The advances in cancer detection and complex treatment regimens have resulted in increased cancer treatment induced HF. The literature indicates that more than 50% of all patients exposed to anthracyclines will show some degree of cardiac dysfunction either acutely or 10 to 20 years after treatment, and 5% of those patients will develop overt HF. Successful management requires a collaborative, interdisciplinary approach. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss how the “Heart Success Program” (HSP) resulted in cost effective and clinical quality outcomes in patients with cancer and HF. Methods: The HSP was piloted in the emergency center and telemetry units with high volume admission of HF patients. The HSP includes comprehensive education of patients, families, and health care providers regarding HF management in cancer patients. HSP implementation includes a HF order set, patient education booklet, and educational videotape specific for patients with cancer and HF. Weekly interdisciplinary clinical rounds provide a forum for discussion of identified patient’s problems and formulation of solutions. Endpoint outcomes include compliance with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) core measures for HF, as well as decreasing HF readmissions. Results: The pilot implementation of the HSP resulted in decreased hospital length of stay by 57%, and average hospital admission cost by 60%. Despite multiple co morbid conditions, patients were discharged with improved functional status and compliance with CMS HF core measures. Conclusions: The findings from this quality improvement project showed significant impact in clinical and cost outcomes for patients with cancer and HF. The multidisciplinary team approach that provided support to patients and their families and allowed for patients to continue their cancer treatment resulting in improved outcomes. As we move toward value-based purchasing, the HSP provides an example of how collaboration and standardized process improvement impacts cost and quality in the oncology population.


Author(s):  
Chelsea R. Horwood ◽  
Morgan Fitzgerald ◽  
Susan D. Moffatt-Bruce ◽  
Michael F. Rayo

The overwhelming number of alarms on medical center floors are false and nonactionable. This leads to delay in alarm response and adverse events. Furthermore, current alarm technology does not have the ability to display patient trends, it only displays one isolated patient event. This paper focuses on describing the methods for creating novel visual displays that incorporates alarm technology and patient decompensation events. Through a multi-disciplinary team approach, that is centered on human factors and system engineers, a novel visual display was created that integrated current alarm technology with patient data. The new displays were better able to predict decompensation and alarm validity. It is crucial to integrate partners from all facets of the medical community and from human factors and system engineering to form an accurate understanding and modeling of patients


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1066-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Dickens ◽  
Karen Vuckovic ◽  
Maria Nehmer ◽  
Rob DiDomenico ◽  
David Kerbow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document