Abstract 258: Adherence To The AHA / ACCF / SCAI / ASE /ASNC - 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria For Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization In An Academic Medical Center.

Author(s):  
SHANMUGAM UTHAMALINGAM ◽  
Taraka V Gadiraju ◽  
Jennifer Frederici ◽  
Khawar Maqsood ◽  
Ankur Gupta ◽  
...  

Objective: To examine the adherence to the published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for diagnostic cardiac catheterization (DCC) in an academic medical center. Background: In May 2012, the American Heart Association and other subspecialty societies have developed AUC for DCC to address the growing rational use of cardiac catheterization in delivering high quality health care. The application of all the subsets of AUC indications to examine the adherence of cardiologists in academic center has not been well studied. Methods: We retrospectively examined a random sample of 499 patients who underwent DCC in our institution between January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013, seven months after the publication of AUC for DCC; and classified as appropriate, uncertain and inappropriate categories according to the AUC. Indications not addressed in the AUC were considered unclassified. Results: The mean age of the study population was 65 (± 13) years with 67% males. Distribution of DCC according to AUC is shown in Table-1. Most DCC were appropriate (93%; n= 462), 6% (n=31) were uncertain and none were inappropriate. Approximately 1% (n=6) DCC were unclassifiable and all had known obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with worsening or limiting symptoms without non invasive stress testing and did not meet criteria for unstable angina. About one quarter (22%; n= 21/86) of DCC performed for patients in the suspected CAD with or without prior non invasive stress testing group were uncertain, 78% (n= 65/86) were appropriate and none were inappropriate. Most DCC (92%) were performed by interventional cardiologists (Figure 1). Conclusions: Most DCCs performed at this academic hospital are adherent with AUC criteria, however variability exists by indication and provider type. Unclassified patients as mentioned above who got referred for DCC by treating cardiologists led to a significant change in their management plan, thereby suggesting these group of patients which currently do not fit to any subset AUC criteria need consideration for further subset AUC categorization. About 22% of the DCC performed in the suspected CAD group were uncertain, none were inappropriate which make our results prominently discordant to recent findings observed among DCC procedures performed for suspected CAD in New York State.

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (47) ◽  
pp. 4136-4138
Author(s):  
Ahmad Younes ◽  
Jennifer S Hoff ◽  
Alexandria M Bojansky ◽  
Ankur Kalra

Author(s):  
Jesse D. Smith ◽  
Linh H. Nguyen ◽  
Tamara Krekel ◽  
Jerrica Waggoner ◽  
David J. Ritchie ◽  
...  

Abstract We conducted a retrospective review of a hybrid antimicrobial restriction process demonstrating adherence to appropriate use criteria in 72% of provisional-only orders, in 100% of provisional orders followed by ID orders, and in 97% of ID-initiated orders. Therapy interruptions occurred in 24% of provisional orders followed by ID orders.


2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. A1233
Author(s):  
Kevin Levitt ◽  
Jeremy Edwards ◽  
Chi-Ming Chow ◽  
Howard Leong-Poi ◽  
Zakariya Albinmousa ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Turner ◽  
Matthew Sacrinty ◽  
Michael Manogue ◽  
William Little ◽  
Sanjay Gandhi ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Hong ◽  
Getu Teressa

Introduction: Noninvasive diagnostic testing serves as gatekeepers to invasive cardiac catheterization. Computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTCA) has been shown to have high sensitivity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the temporal trend of CTCA compared to functional tests and the differential downstream impact on cardiac catheterization is unknown. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the temporal trend of the use in CTCA for the evaluation of patients with chest pain and how it compares to the temporal trend of stress testing. The secondary aim was to investigate the temporal pattern in the cardiac catheterization rate and how it varies between CTCA and stress testing. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 65,686 patients who presented to a large academic medical center with chest pain between 2012 and 2019. We identified those who received CTCA testing or stress testing as the initial diagnostic testing for diagnosing suspected CAD and collected data on downstream cardiac catheterization. We calculated the testing rate per 1000 for each year. Results: Of the patient who received noninvasive imaging (n=18,843), more CTCA was performed (18.6%) compared to stress test (10.1%). After an initial upward trend in CCTA use and a downward trend in stress test use between 2012 and 2014, the trend reversed for both modalities after 2015. The rate of cardiac catheterization increased after 2014, mirroring an increase in stress test utilization. Patients who had stress test first have increased odds of undergoing catheterization compared to those who had CTCA first, even after adjusting for risk factors. However, compared to CTCA, stress test shows a relative decline in the odds of catheterization (Relative adjusted Odd Ratio: 5.6 in 2012 down to 2.8 in 2019) Conclusion: In this large single-center study of chest pain patients, stress-testing leads to increased odds of cardiac catheterization compared to CCTA. However, the relative odds of undergoing catheterization following stress testing show a declining trend.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne V Grossestreuer ◽  
David F Gaieski ◽  
Benjamin S Abella ◽  
Douglas J Wiebe ◽  
Jason S Haukoos ◽  
...  

Background: Most successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest patients do not survive to hospital discharge. Many of those have withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WLST) as a result of a poor neurologic prognosis. Objectives: Determine characteristics of patients who have WLST post-arrest and the differences in their post-arrest care. Methods: We identified comatose post-arrest adult patients from 27 hospitals between 2000-2014. We stratified patients by whether they had WLST and analyzed demographic, arrest, and post-arrest variables. Results: Of 1439 patients analyzed, 558 (39%) patients had WLST. These patients differed in demographic, arrest, and post-arrest characteristics and treatments (Table 1). In multivariate regression analysis, patients who had WLST were more likely to have post-arrest neurology consults (OR 3.5; 95% CI: 2.3-5.3), less likely to go to the cardiac catheterization (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2-0.5) or electrophysiology labs (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8), and had shorter hospital stays (OR 0.9; 95% CI: 0.8-0.9). When multivariate regression was limited to patient demographics and arrest characteristics, patients with WLST were older (OR 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02), had longer downtime (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), were more likely to be female (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-2.0), were less likely to have an initial rhythm of VF/VT (OR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4-0.7), and were less likely to have a witnessed arrest (OR 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9). Patients were less likely to have WLST at an academic medical center (OR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-1.0, p=0.04). Conclusions: Comatose post-arrest patients who had WLST in the hospital were older, were more likely to have a longer arrest downtime, be female, have an initial non-shockable rhythm, have an unwitnessed arrest, and less likely to be at an academic medical center. They are more likely to have post-arrest neurology consults, less likely to go to the cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology labs, and have a shorter hospital stay.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 446-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kipp Slicker ◽  
Wesley G. Lane ◽  
Ola O. Oyetayo ◽  
Laurel A. Copeland ◽  
Eileen M. Stock ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document