scholarly journals Iatrogenic Aortic Dissection … or Intramural Hematoma?

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence D. Welch ◽  
Thomas Foley ◽  
Gregory W. Barsness ◽  
Peter C. Spittell ◽  
R. Thomas Tilbury ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Ide ◽  
Hideo Uchida ◽  
Hideaki Otsuji ◽  
Kiyoshi Nishimine ◽  
Juichi Tsushima ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaro Miyoshi ◽  
Shuichirou Kaji ◽  
Akiko Masumoto ◽  
Toshiaki Toyota ◽  
Taiji Okada ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (B-IMH) is a variant of acute aortic syndrome having similar clinical demographics to type B classic aortic dissection (B-AD), early clinical course including acute complications are not well investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate early clinical course and acute complications of B-IMH in comparison with that of B-AD. Methods: Clinical features and early clinical course including acute complications were retrospectively analyzed in 270 B-IMH and 177 B-AD consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital between 1991 and 2020. Acute complications were defined as rupture, impending rupture, re-dissection, and visceral and leg ischemia. Results: As compared with B-AD, B-IMH presented at older age (72±11 vs 62±15 years; p<0.001), predominantly in females (37% vs 25%). During in-hospital courses, limb ischemia and mesenteric ischemia were less common in patients with B-IMH than those with B-AD (0.4% versus 5.1%, p=0.003, 0.4% versus 2.8%, p=0.03; respectively). In contrast, spinal ischemia was more common in B-IMH patients (2.4% versus 0.6%, p=0.05). Aortic rupture and impending rupture were comparable between B-IMH and B-AD patients (5.9% versus 7.3%. p=0.28). Besides, re-dissection was also comparable between two groups (2.2% versus 5.1%, p=0.06). As a result, prevalence of acute complications was significantly lower in patients with B-IMH (8.8% versus 17%, p=0.008). In-hospital mortality rate in B-IMH was significantly lower than that in B-AD (0.4% versus 9.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Although patients with B-IMH had lower in-hospital mortality rates than patients with B-AD, significant portion of B-IMH patients had fatal complications including spinal ischemia or aortic rupture. Patients with B-IMH should be carefully observed as well as patients with B-AD patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alana Costa Borges ◽  
Marcelo de Sousa Cury ◽  
Gilberto F. de Carvalho ◽  
Stella Maria Torres Furlani

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1868-1870
Author(s):  
Christina M. Vassileva ◽  
Blaine T. Manning ◽  
Theresa M. Boley ◽  
Stephen R. Hazelrigg

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 414-415
Author(s):  
Daniel García Iglesias ◽  
María Martín Fernández ◽  
Fernando López Iglesias ◽  
Juan Calvo Blanco ◽  
César Morís de la Tassa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document