Abstract
Background
The latest guidelines considered glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) as a bailout strategy in selected situations in patients presented with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) however, did not recommend route of administration over another and did not correlate it to infarct size. Infarct size correlates generally with prognosis following acute myocardial infarction and Reduction in infarct size can boost clinical outcomes and decrease rate of heart failure hospitalization.
Purpose
To evaluate intracoronary vs intravenous use of tirofiban on reduction of infarct size in STEMI treated with primary PCI.
Methods
Between February, 2018, and October, 2019, one hundred patients presented within 6 hours of anterior STEMI undergoing primary PCI after exclusion of (rescue PCI, TIMI flow less than II post PCI, Previous MI, Stent thrombosis, Previous CABG, Significant left main occlusion, Pulmonary edema and Cardiogenic shock).
Group (A): 50 patients who were treated by intracoronary bolus infusion of tirofiban followed by IV maintenance dose infusion of tirofiban.
Group (B): 50 patients who were treated by intravenous bolus infusion of tirofiban followed by IV maintenance dose infusion of tirofiban.
Primary endpoint: Infarct size was assessed 1 month after randomization by SPECT.
Secondary endpoint: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospital stay (cardiac death, MI, stroke or target vessel revascularization), heart failure and bleeding.
Results
Patients randomized to intracoronary tirofiban compared with intravenous tirofiban had a significant decrease in the primary end point of infarct size (mean [SD], 14.46% [7.79%] vs 18.06% [7.83%]; P=0.02). Also associated with lower incidence of heart failure (number [%], 8 [16%] vs 17 [34%]; P=0.037). There were no significant differences in any of the MACE or bleeding between the randomized groups at 30 days.
Conclusions
In patients with anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset, intracoronary tirofiban administration when compared to intravenous route during primary PCI resulted in infarction size reduction and lower heart failure incidence mainly driven by enhanced left ventricular systolic function however no distinction between two strategies on MACE or bleeding risk.
Results
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
