Abstract 1122‐000071: Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms, Clinico‐Radiological Outcome and Predictors with Flow Diverter Stent

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Islam El Malky ◽  
Ayman Zakaria ◽  
Essam Abdelhameed ◽  
Hazem Abdelkhalek
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Giant Aneurysms ◽  
Complex Aneurysms ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Large And Giant Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverters

Introduction : Endovascular treatment for large and giant aneurysms has included either a reconstructive approach or a deconstructive approach by parent artery occlusion. 1,2 Stent‐assisted coiling and balloon‐assisted coiling were alternative techniques developed to deal with such complex aneurysms, but studies have shown less expected efficacy. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the flow diverter stents for treating large and giant intracranial aneurysms and to examine possible predictors for radiological and clinical outcomes such as location and presence of branching artery, bifurcation, and adjuvant coiling. Methods : This study had been conducted on 65 consecutive patients with 65 large and giant aneurysms (size ≥ 10 mm) treated with flow diverters; Periprocedural complications were reported in all patients and clinical outcomes. Follow‐up angiography was done for 60 patients (92.3%) at 12 months. Results : The study included 65 patients who harbored 65 aneurysms. The median age was 55.5 years (IQR: 44.25 ‐ 62.75 years), the female represented 70.8 % of all patients. The clinical presentation had been reported (Headache, cranial nerve palsy, motor deficit, seizures, and visual field defect in 40 patients (61.5%), nine patients (13.8%), seven patients (10.8%), five patients (7.7%), and four patients (6.2%) respectively. The vascular risk factors had been reviewed (HTN, DM, smoking, and Hyperlipidemia in 25 patients (9.2%), Six patients (9.2%), sixteen (24.6%), and 10 patients (15.4%) respectively). The median size of aneurysms was 16.4 mm (IQR: 12.50 ‐ 23.85 mm) and the median neck width was 7.15 mm (IQR: 5.85‐10.24 mm). Fourteen aneurysms (21.4 %) had previous treatment, eleven aneurysms (16.9%) were treated by coils only, one case (1.5%) by assisted procedure, one case (1.5%) by previous FDS, and parent artery occlusion in one case (1.5%). Complete occlusion in 50 from 60 aneurysms (83.4%), neck remnant in 8 aneurysms (13.3%), and sac remnant in two aneurysms (3.3%). Periprocedural problems were encountered in 14 patients (21.5%) with morbidity in six patients (9.2%) and mortality in one patient (1.5%). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to discover possible predictors of combined mortality and morbidity and occlusion in Table (1). Conclusions : From this study, it could be concluded that Endovascular treatment of the large and giant aneurysms with flow diverters represents a safe method for treating this kind of complex intracranial aneurysms. Complex aneurysms with branching artery and bifurcation were associated with aneurysm persistence and complications respectively while the location of the aneurysm was the only predictor for clinical outcome.

Challenges in the Endovascular Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysms

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. S3-113-S3-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nestor R. Gonzalez ◽  
Gary Duckwiler ◽  
Reza Jahan ◽  
Yuichi Murayama ◽  
Fernando Viñuela
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Endovascular Techniques ◽  
Giant Aneurysms ◽  
Giant Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Hemodynamic Characteristics

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Giant intracranial aneurysms present unique therapeutic intricacies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomic and hemodynamic characteristics of these lesions and the current endovascular and combined surgical and endovascular techniques available for their treatment. METHODS: A review of the literature and the personal experiences of the authors with endovascular treatment of giant aneurysms are presented. This review included anatomic and hemodynamic features and analysis of the diverse endovascular techniques that have been reported for the management of these aneurysms. RESULTS: Anatomic features that create particular challenges in the therapeutic approach of giant aneurysms include size, shape (saccular, fusiform, serpentine), neck dimensions, branch involvement, intraluminal thrombosis, and location. Hemodynamic characteristics that affect endovascular treatment are lateral or terminal aneurysm type of flow and embolic material placement (inflow versus outflow aneurysmal region). The current endovascular therapeutic approaches include parent artery occlusion, trapping, endosaccular embolization with or without adjunctive techniques such as balloon-assisted or stent placement, and combined surgical and endovascular approaches, mainly with surgical revascularization and endovascular occlusion. CONCLUSION: Although there are a wide variety of endovascular therapeutic options for the treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms, none of the current techniques is completely successful and free of complications in the management of these complex lesions. A detailed and individualized analysis of each case in conjunction with sufficient understanding of the anatomy and hemodynamics of a particular aneurysm should guide the therapeutic decision. Further research advances will assist in elucidating the factors predisposing to genesis, progression, and aggressive clinical manifestations of these giant lesions.

scholarly journals Re-treatment of residual aneurysms after flow diversion: An experimental study

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fahed ◽  
Tim E Darsaut ◽  
Marc Kotowski ◽  
Igor Salazkin ◽  
Jean Raymond
Keyword(s):  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Embolic Agent ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Arterial Lumen ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Liquid Embolic ◽  
Liquid Embolic Agent ◽  
Flow Diverters

Aim Flow diverters are increasingly used to treat aneurysms, but treatment is not always effective. The management of aneurysms that fail to occlude following flow diversion is problematic. We aimed to reproduce failures in an animal model and study re-treatment with additional flow diverters alone or with flow diverters and liquid embolic agent. Material and methods Twenty wide-necked aneurysms were created at the carotid-lingual bifurcation in 10 dogs, and were treated with flow diverters 4–6 weeks later. Follow-up angiography was performed at three months. Suitable residual aneurysms were randomly allocated: re-treatment with flow diverters alone ( n = 6), or with the injection of liquid embolic between two layers of flow diverters ( n = 4) or no re-treatment ( n = 2). Angiography was repeated three months later, followed by euthanasia, photography and pathology. Results Patent wide-necked aneurysms were produced in 17/20 attempts (85%); three months after flow diversion there were 15/17 (88%) residual aneurysms. In three cases, re-treatment was not possible because the flow diverter had prolapsed into the aneurysm, leaving 12 aneurysms to study. Re-treated aneurysms showed improved angiographic results at six months (median score of 2; P = 0.03), but residual aneurysms were present in all cases. Parent artery occlusion occurred in two aneurysms treated with flow diverter plus liquid embolic. At pathology, aneurysms were only partially filled with thrombus; leaks through the flow diverters were found in the neointima connecting the arterial lumen to residual aneurysms. Conclusion Re-treatment of residual flow-diverted experimental aneurysms with additional flow diverters did not lead to aneurysm occlusion.

scholarly journals Current Strategies in the Treatment of Intracranial Large and Giant Aneurysms

2021 ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Matthias Gmeiner ◽  
Andreas Gruber
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Mass Effect ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Giant Aneurysms ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Large And Giant Aneurysms

AbstractIntroduction: Very large and giant aneurysms are among the most challenging cerebrovascular pathologies in neurosurgery.Methods: The aim of this paper is to review the current literature on the management of very large and giant aneurysms and to describe representative cases illustrating possible treatment strategies.Results: In view of the poor natural history, active management using multiprofessional individualized approaches is required to achieve aneurysm occlusion, relief of mass effect, and obliteration of the embolic source. Both reconstructive (clipping, coiling, stent-assisted coiling, flow diversion [FD]) and deconstructive techniques (parent artery occlusion [PAO], PAO in conjunction with bypass surgery, and strategies of flow modification) are available to achieve definitive treatment with acceptable morbidity.Conclusions: Patients harboring such lesions should be managed at high-volume cerebrovascular centers by multidisciplinary teams trained in all techniques of open and endovascular neurosurgery.

Surgical Distal Outflow Occlusion for the Treatment of Complex Intracranial Aneurysms

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Nussbaum
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Cranial Neuropathy ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Complex Aneurysms ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Proximal Occlusion

Abstract BACKGROUND Selected intracranial aneurysms still require parent artery occlusion. Although such occlusion is usually performed proximal to the aneurysm, in rare instances, it may be difficult or impossible to access the proximal parent artery. OBJECTIVE To describe the use of parent artery sacrifice distal to the aneurysm (distal outflow occlusion) in the management of complex aneurysms not amenable to standard microsurgical or endovascular therapy. METHODS We reviewed a comprehensive database of intracranial aneurysms evaluated between 1997 and 2013. Hospital records, neuroimaging studies, operative reports, and outpatient clinic notes were examined for all patients treated with distal outflow occlusion. RESULTS Eighteen patients (11 women, 7 men; ages 28-69 years) underwent surgical distal outflow occlusion. Eight (44%) underwent concomitant distal revascularization. Intraoperative and delayed postoperative angiography was performed in every case. Nine presented with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, 1 had a remote bleeding episode. The remaining lesions were unruptured; 3 were discovered incidentally, 3 had symptomatic cerebral edema, 1 had transient ischemic attacks, and 1 had cranial neuropathy. The average follow-up period was 6.5 years; no patient was lost to follow-up review. Two aneurysms required delayed endovascular treatment. Overall, 16 patients achieved a good outcome, 1 had moderate disability, and 1 died. CONCLUSION We describe our experience with distal outflow occlusion in the treatment of complex aneurysms not amenable to primary clip reconstruction or endovascular therapy. This technique has been described in very limited fashion in the past and may be particularly useful for patients requiring parent artery occlusion when proximal occlusion is challenging or impossible.

Delayed parent artery occlusions following use of SILK flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 690-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian R Macdonald ◽  
Jai J S Shankar
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Cerebral Aneurysms ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Flow Diverters

BackgroundThe efficacy of SILK flow diverters (SFD) in the management of cerebral aneurysms has been established. However, the risk of complications with parent artery occlusion (PAO) remains to be fully elucidated. The purpose of our study was to analyze intracranial aneurysms treated with SFDs and assess for occurrences and potential risk factors for PAO.Materials and methodsBetween September 2010 and September 2017, 34 patients were treated for intracranial aneurysms using SFDs at a Canadian institution. This database was retrospectively analyzed for frequency of PAOs and statistical analysis performed for potential contributing factors.ResultsFollowing treatment with SFDs, average clinical and imaging follow-ups were 31 and 22 months, respectively. PAOs were identified in 21% (7/34) of patients and occurred between 8 days and 1.5 years from intervention but only in 11.8% in those compliant to anti-platelet medications. These were all associated with anterior circulation aneurysms (P=0.131) and had no associated neurological deficits. Of these, 57% (4/7) had a fusiform morphology compared with only 19% (5/27) in non-occluded patients (P=0.039). The presence of clinical symptoms at the time of initial SFD intervention was significantly associated with PAO (P=0.021).ConclusionDelayed PAO is not an uncommon outcome of flow diverter deployment and could be seen up to 1.5 years after treatment with no associated neurological deficits. Anti-platelet non-adherence remains a risk factor for PAO. Fusiform morphology of the aneurysm and symptoms at the time of intervention were associated with subsequent occlusion.

Abstract 125: Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With the LUNA AES Updated

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
NADER SOUROUR ◽  
Michel Piotin ◽  
Raphael Blanc ◽  
Alessandra Biondi ◽  
Charbel Mounayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Aneurysm Embolization

Purpose: The LUNA Aneurysm Embolization System (AES) is a new self-expanding ovoid device that serves as an intra saccular flow diverter as well as a scaffold for endothelization across the neck. The objective of this prospective clinical study aiming to include a total of 63 patients was to evaluate the ability of the AES to occlude intracranial aneurysms while maintaining patency of the parent artery. Materials and Methods: Immediate post-implantation occlusion grade (complete (complete obliteration of the aneurysm including the neck), near-complete (persistence of any portion of the original defect of the arterial wall), or incomplete (any opacification of the sac) compared to baseline), and parent vessel compromise were evaluated. Patients underwent neurological testing with the Modified Rankin Scale and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline and time of discharge. Follow-up included clinical assessment at one, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and angiographic follow-up at 6 and 12 months. Results: 50 patients (9 men) with 47 unruptured and 4 ruptured saccular aneurysms (38 bifurcation, 13 sidewall, sizes from 3.9 to 10.1 mm) were enrolled to date in the study. In all but 2 aneurysms (2 failed procedure converted in coiling) 1 LUNA AES was deployed per aneurysm. In 5 cases, the LUNA AES placement was carried out with balloon microcatheter assistance. In one case, the LUNA AES placement was carried out with a stent. Clinical follow up was uneventful in all but 2 patients (one sustained SAH from a contralateral MCA aneurysm, one had GI bleeding). Immediate complete/near complete occlusion was obtained in 26.5% (13/49). At 6 month follow-up, complete/near complete occlusion was obtained in 70.8% (34/48). There was no parent artery occlusion. None of the treated aneurysm (re)bled during follow-up. 4 aneurysms treated with the LUNA needed retreatment (2 incomplete deployment of the LUNA into the sac, 2 angiographic recurrences). Conclusion: Preliminary results demonstrate good safety profile. Angiographic follow up are promising.

scholarly journals Flow diverter device placement for cerebral aneurysm is not effective for the patient with parent artery occlusion for contralateral aneurysm

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-470
Author(s):  
Takashi Fujii ◽  
Hidenori Oishi ◽  
Kohsuke Teranishi ◽  
Kenji Yatomi ◽  
Kazumoto Suzuki
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Device Placement ◽  
Contralateral Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Flow Diverter Device

Purpose There have been many reports on the risks of enlargement and rupture of residual aneurysms and de novo aneurysm formation in the contralateral internal carotid artery after parent artery occlusion (PAO). In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of flow diverter device placement (FDDP) for the treatment of contralateral internal carotid artery aneurysms after PAO. Methods After 11 patients, who had bilateral large or giant internal carotid aneurysms, were treated for either side with PAO or FDDP, they underwent FDDP for residual lesions in our hospital between October 2015 and June 2018. The patients were divided into two groups, depending on the prior procedure: PAO or FDDP. The embolic state after subsequent FDDP was evaluated by angiography. The embolic state was graded using the O’Kelly Marotta scale. Patients’ characteristics and the embolic state of intracranial aneurysms after FDDP were compared between the two groups. Results Comparing patients’ characteristics between the PAO group and FDDP group, statistically significant differences were observed in laterality of the lesions and the interval between prior treatment and FDDP for residual aneurysms ( p < 0.05). The embolic state at the one-year follow-up revealed that there could be significantly sufficient embolisation in the FDDP group ( p < 0.05). Conclusion When FDDP is performed for the contralateral lesion after PAO treatment, it is difficult to attain sufficient embolisation of intracranial aneurysms because haemodynamic load in this procedure is large compared to that in a regular FDDP.

Peripheral intracranial aneurysms: management challenges in 60 consecutive cases

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Nussbaum ◽  
Michael T. Madison ◽  
James K. Goddard ◽  
Jeffrey P. Lassig ◽  
Leslie A. Nussbaum
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Branch Points ◽  
Aneurysm Neck ◽  
Vertebrobasilar System ◽  
Parent Artery Occlusion ◽  
Major Branch ◽  
Proximal Occlusion

Object The authors report the management and outcomes of 55 patients with 60 intracranial aneurysms arising distal to the major branch points of the circle of Willis and vertebrobasilar system. Methods Between July 1997 and December 2006, the authors' neurovascular service treated 2021 intracranial aneurysms in 1850 patients. The database was reviewed retrospectively to identify peripherally located intracranial aneurysms. Aneurysms that were mycotic and aneurysms that were associated with either an arteriovenous malformation or an atrial myxoma were excluded from review. Results The authors encountered 60 peripheral intracranial aneurysms in 55 patients. There were 42 small, 7 large, and 11 giant lesions. Forty-one (68%) were unruptured, and 19 (32%) had bled. Fifty-three aneurysms were treated surgically by using direct clip reconstruction in 26, trapping or proximal occlusion with distal revascularization in 21, excision with end-to-end anastomosis in 3, and circumferential wrap/clip reconstruction in 3. Coils were used to treat 6 aneurysms, and 1 was treated by endovascular parent artery occlusion. Overall, 49 patients had good outcomes, 4 were left with new neurological deficits, and 2 died. Conclusions Peripherally situated intracranial aneurysms are rare lesions that present unique management challenges. Despite the fact that in the authors' experience these lesions were rarely treatable with simple clipping of the aneurysm neck or endovascular coil occlusion, preservation of the parent artery was possible in most cases, and the majority of patients had a good outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document