The Importance of Spatiotemporal Information in Biological Motion Perception: White Noise Presented with a Step-like Motion Activates the Biological Motion Area

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-285
Author(s):  
Akiko Callan ◽  
Daniel Callan ◽  
Hiroshi Ando

Humans can easily recognize the motion of living creatures using only a handful of point-lights that describe the motion of the main joints (biological motion perception). This special ability to perceive the motion of animate objects signifies the importance of the spatiotemporal information in perceiving biological motion. The posterior STS (pSTS) and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) region have been established by many functional neuroimaging studies as a locus for biological motion perception. Because listening to a walking human also activates the pSTS/pMTG region, the region has been proposed to be supramodal in nature. In this study, we investigated whether the spatiotemporal information from simple auditory stimuli is sufficient to activate this biological motion area. We compared spatially moving white noise, having a running-like tempo that was consistent with biological motion, with stationary white noise. The moving-minus-stationary contrast showed significant differences in activation of the pSTS/pMTG region. Our results suggest that the spatiotemporal information of the auditory stimuli is sufficient to activate the biological motion area.

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p7669 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1225-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cottrell ◽  
Megan E J Campbell

When one hears footsteps in the hall, one is able to instantly recognise it as a person: this is an everyday example of auditory biological motion perception. Despite the familiarity of this experience, research into this phenomenon is in its infancy compared with visual biological motion perception. Here, two experiments explored sensitivity to, and recognition of, auditory stimuli of biological and nonbiological origin. We hypothesised that the cadence of a walker gives rise to a temporal pattern of impact sounds that facilitates the recognition of human motion from auditory stimuli alone. First a series of detection tasks compared sensitivity with three carefully matched impact sounds: footsteps, a ball bouncing, and drumbeats. Unexpectedly, participants were no more sensitive to footsteps than to impact sounds of nonbiological origin. In the second experiment participants made discriminations between pairs of the same stimuli, in a series of recognition tasks in which the temporal pattern of impact sounds was manipulated to be either that of a walker or the pattern more typical of the source event (a ball bouncing or a drumbeat). Under these conditions, there was evidence that both temporal and nontemporal cues were important in recognising theses stimuli. It is proposed that the interval between footsteps, which reflects a walker's cadence, is a cue for the recognition of the sounds of a human walking.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 16-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wittinghofer ◽  
M. H. E. de Lussanet ◽  
M. Lappe

2012 ◽  
pp. 121-138
Author(s):  
Willem E. Frankenhuis ◽  
H. Clark Barrett, ◽  
Scott P. Johnson

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e28391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Pica ◽  
Stuart Jackson ◽  
Randolph Blake ◽  
Nikolaus F. Troje

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid A. Fedorov ◽  
Tjeerd M. H. Dijkstra ◽  
Martin A. Giese

Neuroreport ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (18) ◽  
pp. 1763-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Lichtensteiger ◽  
Thomas Loenneker ◽  
Kerstin Bucher ◽  
Ernst Martin ◽  
Peter Klaver

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document