biological motion perception
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

158
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Victoria Foglia ◽  
Hasan Siddiqui ◽  
Zainab Khan ◽  
Stephanie Liang ◽  
M. D. Rutherford

AbstractIf neurotypical people rely on specialized perceptual mechanisms when perceiving biological motion, then one would not expect an association between task performance and IQ. However, if those with ASD recruit higher order cognitive skills when solving biological motion tasks, performance may be predicted by IQ. In a meta-analysis that included 19 articles, we found an association between biological motion perception and IQ among observers with ASD but no significant relationship among typical observers. If the task required emotion perception, then there was an even stronger association with IQ in the ASD group.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2962
Author(s):  
Yongqi Li ◽  
Xiaowei Ding ◽  
Jiayu Qian ◽  
Zhou Su ◽  
Huichao Ji

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2179
Author(s):  
Kyle Z Pu ◽  
Zixuan Wang ◽  
David Whitney

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenija Slivac ◽  
Alexis Hervais-Adelman ◽  
Peter Hagoort ◽  
Monique Flecken

AbstractLinguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those features, effectively biasing perceptual activation towards the labelled category. In this study, we employ a cueing paradigm with moving, point-light stimuli across three experiments, in order to examine how the number of biological motion features (form and kinematics) encoded in lexical cues modulates the efficacy of lexical top-down influence on perception. We find that the magnitude of lexical influence on biological motion perception rises as a function of the number of biological motion-relevant features carried by both cue and target. When lexical cues encode multiple biological motion features, this influence is robust enough to mislead participants into reporting erroneous percepts, even when a masking level yielding high performance is used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Greta Krasimirova Todorova ◽  
Rosalind Elizabeth Mcbean Hatton ◽  
Frank Earl Pollick

2021 ◽  
pp. 107996
Author(s):  
Lorna C. Quandt ◽  
Emily Kubicek ◽  
Athena Willis ◽  
Jason Lamberton

PLoS Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. e3001172
Author(s):  
Massimo De Agrò ◽  
Daniela C. Rößler ◽  
Kris Kim ◽  
Paul S. Shamble

The body of most creatures is composed of interconnected joints. During motion, the spatial location of these joints changes, but they must maintain their distances to one another, effectively moving semirigidly. This pattern, termed “biological motion” in the literature, can be used as a visual cue, enabling many animals (including humans) to distinguish animate from inanimate objects. Crucially, even artificially created scrambled stimuli, with no recognizable structure but that maintains semirigid movement patterns, are perceived as animated. However, to date, biological motion perception has only been reported in vertebrates. Due to their highly developed visual system and complex visual behaviors, we investigated the capability of jumping spiders to discriminate biological from nonbiological motion using point-light display stimuli. These kinds of stimuli maintain motion information while being devoid of structure. By constraining spiders on a spherical treadmill, we simultaneously presented 2 point-light displays with specific dynamic traits and registered their preference by observing which pattern they turned toward. Spiders clearly demonstrated the ability to discriminate between biological motion and random stimuli, but curiously turned preferentially toward the latter. However, they showed no preference between biological and scrambled displays, results that match responses produced by vertebrates. Crucially, spiders turned toward the stimuli when these were only visible by the lateral eyes, evidence that this task may be eye specific. This represents the first demonstration of biological motion recognition in an invertebrate, posing crucial questions about the evolutionary history of this ability and complex visual processing in nonvertebrate systems.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Peng ◽  
Emiel Cracco ◽  
Nikolaus F. Troje ◽  
Marcel Brass

Previous research suggests that belief in free will correlates positively with intention perception. However, whether belief in free will is also related to more basic social processes is unknown. Based on evidence that biological motion is an intention-carrier, we investigate if belief in free will and related two beliefs, namely belief in dualism and belief in determinism, are associated with biological motion perception. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) was used to measure participants’ ability to detect biological motion from scrambled background noise (d') and their response bias (c) in doing so. In two experiments, we found that belief in determinism and belief in dualism, but not belief in free will, were associated with the perception of biological motion. However, no causal relationship was found when experimentally manipulating free will-related beliefs. In general, our research suggests that basic social processes, like biological motion perception, can be predicted by high-level beliefs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document