Unique Hue Stimulus Choice: A Constraint on Hue Category Formation

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 387-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Kuehni

AbstractBerlin & Kay hue-related basic color categories are compared with the ISCC-NBS system of object color categorization. Though independently derived, categories of the former form a small subset of the latter. A conjecture is proposed that explains the absence of yellow-green and blue-green basic hue categories and the potential for a violet category as the result of constraints on primitive hue category formation due to considerable variation in stimuli selected by color-normal observers as representing for them unique hues.

Author(s):  
Yasmina Jraissati

This chapter examines the method for reporting color in grapheme-color synesthesia and its consequences. The Berlin and Kay basic color categories typology is sometimes used, but one should wonder whether such a simplification is justified, and whether it might not have important theoretical implications for our understanding of synesthesia. In this chapter, such implications are uncovered. A discussion opposing Simner and colleagues to Beeli and colleagues regarding the linguistic vs/color appearance bias of grapheme-color associations is taken as an illustration. Essentially, it is argued that the Berlin and Kay typology is misused, leading to dangerous tensions, and that the assumed relation between color appearance, categories, and terms is not clear. In conclusion, the chapter suggests how research in color categorization can offer alternative frameworks to understand grapheme-color synesthesia, and notes that work in synesthesia can also shed light on color categorization.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelmer P de Vries ◽  
Arash Akbarinia ◽  
Alban Flachot ◽  
Karl R Gegenfurtner

Color is a prime example of categorical perception, yet it is still unclear why and how color categories emerge. The key questions revolve around to what extent perceptual and linguistic processes shape categories. While prelinguistic infants and animals appear to treat color categorically, several recent attempts to model category formation have successfully utilized communicative concepts to predict color categories. Considering this apparent discrepancy, we take a different approach. Rather than modeling categories directly, we focus on the potential emergence of color categories as the result of acquiring basic visual skills. For this, we investigated whether color is represented categorically in a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained to recognize objects in natural images. We systematically trained novel output layers to the CNN for a color classification task, and found that clear borders arise between novel (non-training) colors that are largely invariant to the training colors. We confirmed these border locations by searching for the optimal border placement using an evolutionary algorithm that relies on the principle of categorical perception. Our findings also extend to stimuli with multiple, colored, words of varying color contrast, as well as colored objects with larger colored surfaces. These results provide strong evidence that color categorization can emerge with the development of object recognition.


2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-505
Author(s):  
mohan matthen

are color categories the evolutionary product of their usefulness in communication, or is this an accidental benefit they give us? it is argued here that embodiment constraints on color categorization suggest that communication is an add-on at best. thus, the steels & belpaeme (s&b) model may be important in explaining coordination, but only at the margin. furthermore, the concentration on discrimination is questionable: coclassification is at least as important.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOEL POKORNY ◽  
MARGARET LUTZE ◽  
DINGCAI CAO ◽  
ANDREW J. ZELE

People with normal trichromatic color vision experience variegated hue percepts under dim illuminations where only rod photoreceptors mediate vision. Here, hue perceptions were determined for persons with congenital color vision deficiencies over a wide range of light levels, including very low light levels where rods alone mediate vision. Deuteranomalous trichromats, deuteranopes and protanopes served as observers. The appearances of 24 paper color samples from the OSA Uniform Color Scales were gauged under successively dimmer illuminations from 10 to 0.0003 Lux (1.0 to −3.5 log Lux). Triads of samples were chosen representing each of eight basic color categories; “red,” “pink,” “orange,” “yellow,” “green,” “blue,” “purple,” and “gray.” Samples within each triad varied in lightness. Observers sorted samples into groups that they could categorize with specific color names. Above −0.5 log Lux, the dichromatic and anomalous trichromatic observers sorted the samples into the original representative color groups, with some exceptions. At light levels where rods alone mediate vision, the color names assigned by the deuteranomalous trichromats were similar to the color names used by color normals; higher scotopic reflectance samples were classified as blue-green-grey and lower reflectance samples as red-orange. Color names reported by the dichromats at the dimmest light levels had extensive overlap in their sample scotopic lightness distributions. Dichromats did not assign scotopic color names based on the sample scotopic lightness, as did deuteranomalous trichromats and colour-normals. We reasoned that the reduction in color gamut that a dichromat experiences at photopic light levels leads to a limited association of rod color perception with objects differing in scotopic reflectance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (21) ◽  
pp. 5545-5550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice E. Skelton ◽  
Gemma Catchpole ◽  
Joshua T. Abbott ◽  
Jenny M. Bosten ◽  
Anna Franklin

The biological basis of the commonality in color lexicons across languages has been hotly debated for decades. Prior evidence that infants categorize color could provide support for the hypothesis that color categorization systems are not purely constructed by communication and culture. Here, we investigate the relationship between infants’ categorization of color and the commonality across color lexicons, and the potential biological origin of infant color categories. We systematically mapped infants’ categorical recognition memory for hue onto a stimulus array used previously to document the color lexicons of 110 nonindustrialized languages. Following familiarization to a given hue, infants’ response to a novel hue indicated that their recognition memory parses the hue continuum into red, yellow, green, blue, and purple categories. Infants’ categorical distinctions aligned with common distinctions in color lexicons and are organized around hues that are commonly central to lexical categories across languages. The boundaries between infants’ categorical distinctions also aligned, relative to the adaptation point, with the cardinal axes that describe the early stages of color representation in retinogeniculate pathways, indicating that infant color categorization may be partly organized by biological mechanisms of color vision. The findings suggest that color categorization in language and thought is partially biologically constrained and have implications for broader debate on how biology, culture, and communication interact in human cognition.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengdan Sun ◽  
Luming Hu ◽  
Xiaoyang Xin ◽  
Xuemin Zhang

A long-standing debate exists on how our brain assigns the fine-grained perceptual representation of color into discrete color categories. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified several regions as the candidate loci of color categorization, including the visual cortex, language-related areas, and non-language-related frontal regions, but the evidence is mixed. Distinct from most studies that emphasized the representational differences between color categories, the current study focused on the variability among members within a category (e.g., category prototypes and boundaries) to reveal category encoding in the brain. We compared and modeled brain activities evoked by color stimuli with varying distances from the category boundary in an active categorization task. The frontal areas, including the inferior and middle frontal gyri, medial superior frontal cortices, and insular cortices, showed larger responses for colors near the category boundary than those far from the boundary. In addition, the visual cortex encodes both within-category variability and cross-category differences. The left V1 in the calcarine showed greater responses to colors at the category center than to those far from the boundary, and the bilateral V4 showed enhanced responses for colors at the category center as well as colors around the boundary. The additional representational similarity analyses (RSA) revealed that the bilateral insulae and V4a carried information about cross-category differences, as cross-category colors exhibited larger dissimilarities in brain patterns than within-category colors. Our study suggested a hierarchically organized network in the human brain during active color categorization, with frontal (both lateral and medial) areas supporting domain-general decisional processes and the visual cortex encoding category structure and differences, likely due to top-down modulation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1001-1001
Author(s):  
D. Lindsey ◽  
A. Brown ◽  
D. Brainard ◽  
C. Apicella

i-Perception ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 204166951879206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasmina Jraissati ◽  
Igor Douven

So far, color-naming studies have relied on a rather limited set of color stimuli. Most importantly, stimuli have been largely limited to highly saturated colors. Because of this, little is known about how people categorize less saturated colors and, more generally, about the structure of color categories as they extend across all dimensions of color space. This article presents the results from a large Internet-based color-naming study that involved color stimuli ranging across all available chroma levels in Munsell space. These results help answer such questions as how English speakers name a more complex color set, whether English speakers use so-called basic color terms (BCTs) more frequently for more saturated colors, how they use non-BCTs in comparison with BCTs, whether non-BCTs are highly consensual in less saturated parts of the solid, how deep inside color space basic color categories extend, or how they behave on the chroma dimension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document