Teodoro Moscoso and Puerto Rico's Operation Bootstrap

Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 142-172
Author(s):  
Aimee Loiselle

AbstractIn 1898, US occupation of Puerto Rico opened possibilities for experimentation with manufacturing, investment, tariffs, and citizenship because the Treaty of Paris did not address territorial incorporation. Imperial experimentation started immediately and continued through the liberal policies of the New Deal and World War II, consistently reproducing drastic exceptions. These exceptions were neither permanent nor complete, but the rearrangements of sovereignty and citizenship established Puerto Rico as a site of potential and persistent exemption. Puerto Rican needleworkers were central to the resulting colonial industrialization-not as dormant labor awaiting outside developmental forces but as skilled workers experienced in production. Following US occupation, continental trade agents and manufacturers noted the intricate needlework of Puerto Rican women and their employment in homes and small shops for contractors across the island. Their cooptation and adaptation of this contracting system led to the colonial industrialization, generating bureaucratic, financial, and legal infrastructure later used in Operation Bootstrap, a long-term economic plan devised in the 1940s and 1950s. Labor unions and aggrieved workers contested and resisted this colonial industrialization. They advocated their own proposals and pushed against US economic policies and insular business management. Throughout these fights, the asymmetrical power of the federal government and industrial capital allowed the colonial regime to assert US sovereignty while continually realigning exemptions and redefining citizenship for liberal economic objectives. Rather than representing a weakening of the nation-state, this strong interventionist approach provided scaffolding for Operation Bootstrap, which became a model for the neoliberal projects called export processing zones (EPZs).


1958 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Force
Keyword(s):  

1959 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 21-77
Author(s):  
Vernon S. Sprague
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Hector Cordero-Guzman
Keyword(s):  

1959 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 398-402
Author(s):  
Luther Gulick
Keyword(s):  

1948 ◽  
Vol 246 (5) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
R.H.O.
Keyword(s):  

Itinerario ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 90-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen I. Safa

It has been over a hundred years since the U.S. took control of Puerto Rico. In that time, the way in which the U.S. perceived Puerto Rico has changed from a colony requiring Americanisation to, in the 1950s, its showcase of democracy in the Caribbean, to today, an island that still retains geopolitical importance for the U.S., but represents an increasing economic burden. The failure of Operation Bootstrap, as the Puerto Rican industrialization program was known, resulted in permanent large-scale unemployment, with a population dependent on federal transfers for a living, and a constant source of migration to the mainland, where over half of Puerto Ricans now live. I shall trace the outline of these three stages in U.S. hegemony over Puerto Rico, and argue that throughout the U.S. Congress was reluctant to fully incorporate Puerto Rico, because its population was deemed racially and socially inferior to that of the mainland. Though the removal of Spain from Puerto Rico, Cuba and the Philippines was considered part of the its ‘manifest destiny’, the United States never intended to incorporate these people so different from the U.S. as part of the American nation, as was done with its earlier acquisitions in Texas, Alaska or even Hawaii.


1998 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Leonard ◽  
A. W. Maldonado
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document