Transtextual Transformations of Prometheus Bound in Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Prometheus Unbound: Prometheus’ Gifts to Humankind

PMLA ◽  
1949 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-133
Author(s):  
Bennett Weaver

Shelley's Prometheus Unbound in many ways might be considered the most significant and characteristic of his works. Yet in this drama the poet himself has pointed out his indebtedness to the Prometheus Bound of Æschylus. Able scholars, in turn, have examined the relationship between the English and the Greek plays. Over half a century ago Vera D. Scudder published her study, and in 1908 Richard Ackermann brought out his critical commentary. Among others, W. J. Alexander and A. M. D. Hughes, in editing their selections from the poems of Shelley, noted the parallels between his work and that of Æschylus. In more recent times, Carl Grabo has gone beyond the study of Greek-English parallels, and Newman Ivey White in the notable twenty-second chapter of his Shelley has enriched our understanding of Prometheus Unbound. Still one may hope by concentrating on the problem to give fuller meaning to the action of the mind of Æschylus upon that of Shelley as together they face tyranny and pain.


1928 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-67
Author(s):  
A. S. Owen

Author(s):  
Alan H. Sommerstein

The only Hesiodic myths taken up by the Greek tragic dramatists are the related stories of Prometheus and the first woman (Pandora); these were exploited in satyr-dramas by Aeschylus and Sophocles, respectively. More important are the tragedies Prometheus Bound and Prometheus Unbound, attributed to Aeschylus (but probably in fact by another hand, perhaps his son Euphorion), in which the tale of Prometheus’s punishment is combined with several other myths into a new story of a god who becomes the savior both of the human race (twice) and of Zeus (also twice), and who endures terrible suffering before finally gaining honor from Zeus and humans. Hesiod’s ideas also had a profound influence on Aeschylus, traceable especially in the Oresteia and in the unidentified “Dike play” known from papyrus fragments.


Ramus ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 162-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Rader

Prometheus Bound (PV) is a meditation on God par excellence, second only perhaps to the Bible or Paradise Lost. It is, accordingly, the only extant tragedy from the ancient world featuring the most characters as gods. For this reason it stands out in a genre fixated principally on human suffering, where ‘death carries overwhelmingly more weight than salvation’. Gods, of course, do not suffer like humans: Prometheus, the play's protagonist extraordinaire, may be subject to an eternity of punishment for stealing fire from Zeus, but his pain, real and visceral as it is, differs from ours in that it lacks the potential closure of death. It is perhaps justifiable then to suggest the play's focus is not just the awful things gods are capable of doing to one another (just like humans), but rather the meaning of such behaviour without the ultimate consequence (death). That is, the portrayal of Prometheus suffering and Zeus menacing redounds equally to the type of characters they are as to simply what they are. Whereas the former aspect is of psychological or political interest, the latter is a theological concern. And PV is theological in its implications as much as it is political. Hence the question: What type of theology does it convey? The answer is complex.In the modern world PV has primarily been read for its political allegory—as a meditation on oppression, or martyrdom for the intellectual cause. Eric Havelock's translation and study of the play, to cite an illustrative example, was called The Crucifixion of Intellectual Man (1950). Many critics therefore argue that the play articulates the conflict between Prometheus and Zeus in terms of freedom versus authoritarianism. As Shelley famously wrote in the prologue to his Prometheus Unbound, the imprisoned Prometheus represents ‘the highest perfection of moral and intellectual nature impelled by the purest and the truest motives to the best and noblest ends’ (1820). Marx and Goethe felt similarly. This position aligns Prometheus with the forces of enlightenment and progress over against the brutality of Zeus's authority.


1884 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 263-306
Author(s):  
W. Watkiss Lloyd

The Greek dramatist of the best age, as we read on unquestionable authority, was wont to produce his tragedies in sets of three together—in trilogies; the addition to such a set of a comic—a so-called satyric play—completed a tetralogy, a combination of four arguments. It is much if we have in the Cyclops of Euripides a single example of a satyric drama. Among the numerous tragedies that have survived, with the exception of the Oresteia of Aeschylus, consisting of the three tragedies, Agamemnon, the Choephori, the Eumenides, not a single certified trilogy has come down to us complete. The satyric drama that belonged to this was entitled Proteus, but the name only has been preserved. Its argument and bearing on the original artistic whole are too absolutely matters of conjecture not to remain matters of ardent dispute. The Seven against Thebes of Aeschylus is a single play remaining out of a tetralogy of which the titles are preserved:—Laius, Oedipus, Seven against Thebes, Sphinx; titles from which it is clear that the subjects of this set—the Oedipodeia—followed on in sequence and connection as intimate as the preserved tragedies of the Oresteia. Such may also easily have been the case between a pair of dramas, the Edonae and Bassarides, which are recorded as pertaining to the trilogy of the Lycurgeia; and a Prometheus Unbound supplied originally the proper sequel of the Prometheus Bound that is preserved. Nor is such sequence absent virtually from the tetralogy of the Persica to which the preserved play of the Persae belongs, comprising in order; Phineus, Persae, Glaucus Potnieus, Prometheus purphoros, though it is effected in a manner abnormal and recondite. In my Age of Pericles I have set forth in detail the reference of the three successive tragic dramas to the great victories of Artemisium, Salamis and Plataea, and of the concluding satyric play to the sequel of those victories in the restoration of civil life and the arts of culture. The action of the Persae however, alone, is on proper historical basis; the other combined subjects become significant and are justified in their relation to it, on the strength of accepted poetical and mythical associations.


Author(s):  
Percy Bysshe Shelley
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Patricia Junker
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document