Ten Lectures on Cognitive Evolutionary Linguistics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Verhagen
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Saldana ◽  
Simon Kirby ◽  
Robert Truswell ◽  
Kenny Smith

AbstractCompositional hierarchical structure is a prerequisite for productive languages; it allows language learners to express and understand an infinity of meanings from finite sources (i.e., a lexicon and a grammar). Understanding how such structure evolved is central to evolutionary linguistics. Previous work combining artificial language learning and iterated learning techniques has shown how basic compositional structure can evolve from the trade-off between learnability and expressivity pressures at play in language transmission. In the present study we show, across two experiments, how the same mechanisms involved in the evolution of basic compositionality can also lead to the evolution of compositional hierarchical structure. We thus provide experimental evidence showing that cultural transmission allows advantages of compositional hierarchical structure in language learning and use to permeate language as a system of behaviour.


2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc D. Hauser ◽  
David Barner ◽  
Tim O'Donnell

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Croft

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc D. Hauser ◽  
David Barner ◽  
Tim O’Donnell

This article explores the evolution of language, focusing on insightsderived from observations and experiments in animals, guided by currenttheoretical problems that were inspired by the generative theory ofgrammar, and carried forward in substantial ways to the present bypsycholinguists working on child language acquisition. We suggest that overthe past few years, there has been a shift with respect to empiricalstudies of animals targeting questions of language evolution. Inparticular, rather than focus exclusively on the ways in which animalscommunicate, either naturally or by means of artificially acquired symbolsystems, more recent work has focused on the underlying computationalmechanisms subserving the language faculty and the ability of nonhumananimals to acquire these in some form. This shift in emphasis has broughtbiologists studying animals in closer contact with linguists studying theformal aspects of language, and has opened the door to a new line ofempirical inquiry that we label evolingo. Here we review some of theexciting new findings in the evolingo area, focusing in particular onaspects of semantics and syntax.With respect to semantics, we suggest thatsome of the apparently distinctive and uniquely linguistic conceptualdistinctions may have their origins in nonlinguistic conceptualrepresentations; as one example, we present data on nonhuman primates andtheir capacity to represent a singular–plural distinction in the absence oflanguage. With respect to syntax, we focus on both statistical andrule-based problems, especially the most recent attempts to exploredifferent layers within the Chomsky hierarchy; here, we discuss work ontamarins and starlings, highlighting differences in the patterns of resultsas well as differences in methodology that speak to potential issues oflearnability. We conclude by highlighting some of the exciting questionsthat lie ahead, as well as some of the methodological challenges that faceboth comparative and developmental studies of language evolution.


Author(s):  
April McMahon ◽  
Robert McMahon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document