Theoretical analysis of the relationship between changes in retinal blood flow and ocular perfusion pressure

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Cassani ◽  
Alon Harris ◽  
Brent Siesky ◽  
Julia Arciero
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidan Jmor ◽  
John C. Chen

In this chapter, we review the basics of retinal vascular anatomy and discuss the physiologic process of retinal blood flow regulation. We then aim to explore the relationship between intraocular pressure and retinal circulation, taking into account factors that affect retinal hemodynamics. Specifically, we discuss the concepts of ocular perfusion pressure, baro-damage to the endothelium and transmural pressure in relation to the intraocular pressure. Finally, we demonstrate the inter-relationships of these factors and concepts in the pathogenesis of some retinal vascular conditions; more particularly, through examples of two common clinical pathologies of diabetic retinopathy and central retinal vein occlusion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-299
Author(s):  
Jesús Vera ◽  
Raimundo Jiménez ◽  
Beatríz Redondo ◽  
Amador García-Ramos

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syril Dorairaj ◽  
Fabio N Kanadani ◽  
Carlos R Figueiredo ◽  
Rafaela Morais Miranda ◽  
Patricia LT Cunha ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 2126 ◽  
Author(s):  
John V. Lovasik ◽  
He´le`ne Kergoat ◽  
Charles E. Riva ◽  
Benno L. Petrig ◽  
Martial Geiser

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian L. Demasi ◽  
Francesco Porpiglia ◽  
Augusto Tempia ◽  
Savino D’Amelio

Purpose: Several ischemic optic neuropathies that occurred during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) have been reported to be due to the Trendelenburg position, which lowers ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). We examined changes in pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) and its correlation with OPP during RALRP in the steep Trendelenburg position. Methods: Pulsatile ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured in 50 patients by the OBF Langham System 5 times during RALRP. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate, plateau airway pressure, and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) at each time point were recorded. Ocular perfusion pressure was calculated from simultaneous IOP and MAP measurements. Results: Pulsatile ocular blood flow was 15.53 ± 3.32 µL/s at T0, 18.99 ± 4.95 µL/s at T1, 10.04 ± 3.24 µL/s at T2, 11.45 ± 3.02 µL/s at T3, and 15.07 ± 3.81 µL/s at T4. Ocular perfusion pressure was 70.15 ± 5.98 mm Hg at T0, 64.21 ± 6.77 mm Hg at T1, 57.71 ± 7.07 mm Hg at T2, 51.73 ± 11.58 mm Hg at T3, and 64.21 ± 12.37 mm Hg at T4. Repeated-measures analysis of variance on POBF and OPP was significant (p>0.05). This difference disappeared when the correlation between MAP and POBF, EtCO2 and POBF, and EtCO2 and OPP were considered, while correlation between MAP and OPP confirmed the difference. The regression analysis between POBF and OPP showed a statistically significant difference at T0 and T3 (r = 0.047, p = 0.031 and r = 0.096, p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: Pulsatile ocular blood flow and OPP reached the lowest level at the end of surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document