scholarly journals Visual input that matches the content of visual working memory requires less (not faster) evidence sampling to reach conscious access

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surya Gayet ◽  
Leendert van Maanen ◽  
Micha Heilbron ◽  
Chris L. E. Paffen ◽  
Stefan Van der Stigchel
2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siyi Chen ◽  
Thomas Töllner ◽  
Hermann J. Müller ◽  
Markus Conci

Completion of a partially occluded object requires that a representation of the whole is constructed based on the information provided by the physically specified parts of the stimulus. Such processes of amodal completion rely on the generation and maintenance of a mental image that renders the completed object in visual working memory (VWM). The present study examined this relationship between VWM storage and processes of object completion. We recorded event-related potentials to track VWM maintenance by means of the contralateral delay activity (CDA) during a change detection task in which composite objects (notched shapes abutting an occluding shape) to be memorized were primed to induce either a globally completed object or a noncompleted, mosaic representation. The results revealed an effect of completion in VWM despite physically identical visual input: change detection was more accurate for completed compared with mosaic representations when observers were required to memorize two objects, and these differences were reduced with four memorized items. At the electrophysiological level, globally completed (vs. mosaic) objects gave rise to a corresponding increase in CDA amplitudes. These results indicate that although incorporating the occluded portions of the presented shapes requires mnemonic resources, the complete object representations thus formed in VWM improve change detection performance by providing a more simple, regular shape. Overall, these findings demonstrate that mechanisms of object completion modulate VWM, with the memory load being determined by the structured representations of the memorized stimuli. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that completion of partially occluded objects requires visual working memory (VWM) resources. In the experiment reported, we induced observers to memorize a given visual input either as completed or as noncompleted objects. The results revealed both a behavioral performance advantage for completed vs. noncompleted objects despite physically identical input, and an associated modulation of an electrophysiological component that reflects VWM object retention, thus indicating that constructing an integrated object consumes mnemonic resources.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (28) ◽  
pp. 6638-6647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surya Gayet ◽  
Matthias Guggenmos ◽  
Thomas B. Christophel ◽  
John-Dylan Haynes ◽  
Chris L.E. Paffen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Surya Gayet ◽  
Chris Paffen ◽  
Matthias Guggenmos ◽  
Philipp Sterzer ◽  
Stefan Van der Stigchel

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Surya Gayet ◽  
Matthias Guggenmos ◽  
Thomas Christophel ◽  
John-Dylan Haynes ◽  
Chris Paffen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Saito ◽  
Matthew Kolisnyk ◽  
Keisuke Fukuda

Despite the active neural mechanisms that support the temporary maintenance of stimulus-specific information, visual working memory (VWM) content can be systematically biased towards novel perceptual input. These memory biases are commonly attributed to interference that arises when perceptual input is physically similar to current VWM content. However, recent work has suggested that deliberately comparing the similarity of VWM representations to novel perceptual input modulates the size of memory biases above and beyond stimulus-driven effects. Here, we sought to determine the modulatory nature of deliberate perceptual comparisons by comparing the size of memory biases following deliberate comparisons to those induced instead when novel perceptual input is ignored (Experiment 1) or encoded into VWM (Experiment 2). We find that individuals reported larger attraction biases in their VWM representation following deliberate perceptual comparisons than when they ignored or remembered the perceptual input. An analysis of participants’ perceptual comparisons revealed that memory biases were amplified when the perceptual input was endorsed as similar—but not dissimilar—to the current VWM representation. This pattern persisted even after the physical similarity between the VWM representation and perceptual input was matched across trials, confirming that perceptual comparisons themselves played a causal role in modulating memory biases. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that using a VWM representation to evaluate novel perceptual input risks exaggerating the featural overlap between them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document