scholarly journals Reversal of visual hemineglect: Differential influences of deactivating either contralateral posterior parietal cortex or the superior colliculus

10.1167/2.7.1 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Woller ◽  
W. H. Barnes ◽  
B. R. Payne ◽  
S. G. Lomber
1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 3493-3497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Paré ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz

Paré, Martin and Robert H. Wurtz. Monkey posterior parietal cortex neurons antidromically activated from superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 3493–3497, 1997. The connection between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and the superior colliculus (SC) was investigated by antidromically activating neurons within the lateral intraparietal (LIP) area with single-pulse stimulation delivered to the intermediate layers of the SC. To dissociate visual and saccade-related responses, the discharge properties of the identified efferent neurons were studied in the delayed visually guided saccade task and the memory guided saccade task. We found that the great majority (74%) of the identified LIP efferent neurons have a peripheral visual receptive field, typically with a broad spatial tuning. About two-thirds (64%) exhibited sustained activity during the delay period of the behavioral tasks, during which the monkeys had to withhold eye movements, and 80% of these increased their activity just before the onset of saccades. Both delay and presaccadic discharges in the delayed visually guided saccade task were higher than in the memory guided saccade task. These results establish that the neuronal signal sent by LIP to the SC carries both visual and saccade-related information.


2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN G. LOMBER ◽  
BERTRAM R. PAYNE

The purpose of the present study was to compare and contrast behavioral performance on three different tasks of spatial cognition during unilateral and bilateral reversible deactivation of posterior parietal cortex. Specifically, we examined posterior middle suprasylvian (pMS) sulcal cortex in adult cats during temporary and reversible cooling deactivation. In Task 1, the cats oriented to a high-contrast, black visual stimulus moved into the visual field periphery. In Task 2, the cats oriented to a static light-emitting diode (LED). Task 3 examined the cats' ability to determine whether a black-and-white checkered, landmark box was closer to the right or left side of the testing apparatus. Following training on all tasks, cryoloops were implanted bilaterally within the pMS sulcus. Unilateral deactivation of pMS sulcal cortex resulted in virtually no responses to either moved or static stimuli and virtually no responses to landmarks presented in the contralateral hemifield, and a profound contralateral hemifield neglect was induced. Responses to stimuli and landmarks presented in the ipsilateral hemifield were unimpaired. Additive, bilateral cooling of the homotopic region in the contralateral hemisphere, but not an adjacent region, resulted in reversal of the initial hemineglect for the moved stimulus, yet induced a complete failure to orient to peripheral static LED stimuli. Bilateral cooling also reversed the contralateral neglect of the landmark, but then cats could not accurately determine position of the landmark anywhere in the visual field because performance was reduced to chance levels for all landmark loci in both hemifields. In this instance, as the contralateral neglect disappeared during bilateral cooling of pMS cortex, a new spatial discrimination deficit was revealed across the entire visual field. We conclude that pMS cortex contributes in multiple ways to the analyses of space, and that these contributions cannot be safely predicted from analyses of unilateral deactivations or from one task to another. Moreover, it is clear that other structures are capable of guiding orienting to high contrast, moved targets when pMS cortex is eliminated from brain circuitry. However, these same structures are incapable of supporting either orienting to static stimuli or analyses of spatial relations as tested with the landmark task. The impact of reversible deactivation of the superior colliculus on these same tasks is discussed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 682-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay A. Edelman ◽  
Jacqueline Gottlieb ◽  
Michael E. Goldberg

The posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye field contain maps of visual salience on which the decision to choose a saccade may be based. However, an averaging express saccade is not represented by a victorious unimodal representation in the superior colliculus. Normalization as described by Findlay & Walker is not necessary for the generation of saccades.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Tseng ◽  
Cassidy Sterling ◽  
Adam Cooper ◽  
Bruce Bridgeman ◽  
Neil G. Muggleton ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imogen M Kruse

The near-miss effect in gambling behaviour occurs when an outcome which is close to a win outcome invigorates gambling behaviour notwithstanding lack of associated reward. In this paper I postulate that the processing of concepts which are deemed controllable is rooted in neurological machinery located in the posterior parietal cortex specialised for the processing of objects which are immediately actionable or controllable because they are within reach. I theorise that the use of a common machinery facilitates spatial influence on the perception of concepts such that the win outcome which is 'almost complete' is perceived as being 'almost within reach'. The perceived realisability of the win increases subjective reward probability and the associated expected action value which impacts decision-making and behaviour. This novel hypothesis is the first to offer a neurological model which can comprehensively explain many empirical findings associated with the near-miss effect as well as other gambling phenomena such as the ‘illusion of control’. Furthermore, when extended to other compulsive behaviours such as drug addiction, the model can offer an explanation for continued drug-seeking following devaluation and for the increase in cravings in response to perceived opportunity to self-administer, neither of which can be explained by simple reinforcement models alone. This paper therefore provides an innovative and unifying perspective for the study and treatment of behavioural and substance addictions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document