scholarly journals Attentional modulation of the population contrast response function within human visual cortex

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2671
Author(s):  
Ilona Bloem ◽  
Jasmine Pan ◽  
Sam Ling
2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 888-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane G. Albrecht ◽  
Wilson S. Geisler ◽  
Robert A. Frazor ◽  
Alison M. Crane

Cortical neurons display two fundamental nonlinear response characteristics: contrast-set gain control (also termed contrast normalization) and response expansion (also termed half-squaring). These nonlinearities could play an important role in forming and maintaining stimulus selectivity during natural viewing, but only if they operate well within the time frame of a single fixation. To analyze the temporal dynamics of these nonlinearities, we measured the responses of individual neurons, recorded from the primary visual cortex of monkeys and cats, as a function of the contrast of transient stationary gratings that were presented for a brief interval (200 ms). We then examined 1) the temporal response profile (i.e., the post stimulus time histogram) as a function of contrast and 2) the contrast response function throughout the course of the temporal response. We found that the shape and complexity of the temporal response profile varies considerably from cell to cell. However, within a given cell, the shape remains relatively invariant as a function of contrast and appears to be simply scaled and shifted. Stated quantitatively, approximately 95% of the variation in the temporal responses as a function of contrast could be accounted for by scaling and shifting the average poststimulus time histogram. Equivalently, we found that the overall shape of the contrast response function (measured every 2 ms) remains relatively invariant from the onset through the entire temporal response. Further, the contrast-set gain control and the response expansion are fully expressed within the first 10 ms after the onset of the response. Stated quantitatively, the same, scaled Naka-Rushton equation (with the same half-saturation contrast and expansive response exponent) provides a good fit to the contrast response function from the first 10 ms through the last 10 ms of the temporal response. Based upon these measurements, it appears as though the two nonlinear properties, contrast-set gain control and response expansion, are present in full strength, virtually instantaneously, at the onset of the response. This observation suggests that response expansion and contrast-set gain control can influence the performance of visual cortex neurons very early in a single fixation, based on the contrast within that fixation. In the discussion, we consider the implications of the results within the context of 1) slower types of contrast gain control, 2) discrimination performance, 3) drifting steady-state measurements, 4) functional models that incorporate response expansion and contrast normalization, and 5) structural models of the biochemical and biophysical neural mechanisms.


1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane G. Albrecht ◽  
Wilson S. Geisler

AbstractThe responses of simple cells were recorded from the visual cortex of cats, as a function of the position and contrast of counterphase and drifting grating patterns, to assess whether direction selectivity can be accounted for on the basis of linear summation. The expected responses to a counterphase grating, given a strictly linear model, would be the sum of the responses to the two drifting components. The measured responses were not consistent with the linear prediction. For example, nearly all cells showed two positions where the responses approached zero (i.e. two “null phase positions”); this was true, even for the most direction selective cells. However, the measured responses were consistent with the hypothesis that direction selectivity is a consequence of the linear spatiotemporal receptive-field structure, coupled with the nonlinearities revealed by the contrast-response function: contrast gain control, halfwave rectification, and expansive exponent. When arranged in a particular sequence, each of these linear and nonlinear mechanisms performs a useful function in a general model of simple cells. The linear spatiotemporal receptive field initiates stimulus selectivity (for direction, orientation, spatial frequency, etc.). The expansive response exponent enhances selectivity. The contrast-set gain control maintains selectivity (over a wide range of contrasts, in spite of the limited dynamic response range and steep slope of the contrast-response function). Rectification conserves metabolic energy.


2021 ◽  
pp. JN-RM-0106-21
Author(s):  
Louis N. Vinke ◽  
Ilona M. Bloem ◽  
Sam Ling

1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 910-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Laughlin

Abstract The contrast-response function of a class of first order intemeurons in the fly's compound eye approximates to the cumulative probability distribution of contrast levels in natural scenes. Elementary information theory shows that this matching enables the neurons to encode contrast fluctuations most efficiently.


NeuroImage ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Yamagishi ◽  
Daniel E Callan ◽  
Naokazu Goda ◽  
Stephen J Anderson ◽  
Yoshikazu Yoshida ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (16) ◽  
pp. 1726-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick H.W. Chu ◽  
Henry H.L. Chan ◽  
Yiu-fai Ng ◽  
Brian Brown ◽  
Andrew W. Siu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona M. Bloem ◽  
Sam Ling

AbstractAlthough attention is known to increase the gain of visuocortical responses, its underlying neural computations remain unclear. Here, we used fMRI to test the hypothesis that a neural population’s ability to be modulated by attention is dependent on divisive normalization. To do so, we leveraged the feature-tuned properties of normalization and found that visuocortical responses to stimuli sharing features normalized each other more strongly. Comparing these normalization measures to measures of attentional modulation, we discovered that subpopulations that exhibited stronger normalization also exhibited larger attentional benefits. In a converging experiment, we demonstrated that attentional benefits were greatest when a subpopulation was forced into a state of stronger normalization. We propose a tuned normalization model of attention that parsimoniously accounts for many properties of our results, suggesting that the degree to which a subpopulation exhibits normalization plays a role in dictating its potential for attentional benefits.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
M. Katkov ◽  
M. Tsodyks ◽  
D. Sagi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document