Progressive Splenomegaly following Splenic Artery Embolization

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-439
Author(s):  
Bratcher L. Runyan ◽  
R. Stephen Smith ◽  
Jacqueline S. Osland

Nonoperative management of splenic injury is standard in hemodynamically stable patients. Splenic artery embolization is a useful adjunct to nonoperative management for patients with ongoing hemorrhage. However, the complications of embolization are not well defined. We report a case of progressive splenomegaly requiring delayed splenectomy after embolization. A 57-year-old hemodynamically stable, blunt trauma patient had a Grade III splenic injury with associated subcapsular hematoma. Nonoperative management was initiated, but his hemoglobin levels progressively declined prompting proximal splenic artery embolization. His hemoglobin levels remained stable postembolization and he was discharged on postinjury day 5. The patient was readmitted 10 days later with increasing abdominal pain and shortness of breath. Repeat CT revealed an enlarged subcapsular fluid collection, but his hemoglobin level remained stable and he was discharged 5 days later. He returned again 2 days later with similar complaints, and CT demonstrated that his subcapsular fluid collection was further enlarged. Repeat hemoglobin level was again stable. The patient requested operative intervention due to intractable pain, and splenectomy was performed without complications. Operative findings included a sterile, contained subcapsular hematoma. Splenic embolization has emerged as an adjunct to nonoperative management of splenic injury; however, the indications for splenic embolization are yet to be defined, and the spectrum and frequency of potential complications are poorly documented. This case report highlights a potentially serious complication that can occur after splenic embolization.

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Majd Habash ◽  
Darrel Ceballos ◽  
Andrew J. Gunn

AbstractThe spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable due to splenic trauma undergo definitive operative management. Interventional radiology plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of the hemodynamically stable trauma patient with splenic injury. Hemodynamically stable patients selected for nonoperative management have improved clinical outcomes when splenic artery embolization is utilized. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, technical aspects, and clinical outcomes of splenic artery embolization for patients with high-grade splenic injuries.


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. van der Vlies ◽  
J. Hoekstra ◽  
K. J. Ponsen ◽  
J. A. Reekers ◽  
O. M. van Delden ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Sweat ◽  
Jonathan M. Dort ◽  
R. Stephen Smith

Splenomegaly is a sequela of infectious mononucleosis. The potential for traumatic rupture of an enlarged spleen is well recognized. Recently, splenic artery embolization has gained popularity for the treatment of splenic injury. However, embolization has not been described for splenic injury in an enlarged spleen secondary to mononucleosis. We report the case of a 15-year-old girl who was the restrained passenger in a motor vehicle crash. On examination at an American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 trauma center, the patient was found to have abdominal pain. A focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination revealed fluid in Morison's pouch. A subsequent spiral CT scan with intravenous contrast revealed a markedly enlarged spleen with a shattered upper pole. The patient denied symptoms of mononucleosis; however, a spot mononucleosis test was positive. The patient was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit for observation. She remained hemodynamically stable, but her initial hemoglobin of 9.2 g/dL fell to 7.1 g/dL 6 hours later. Splenic artery embolization was performed and the upper pole of the spleen was selectively embolized. The hemoglobin remained stable and the patient was transferred to the pediatric ward. On postembolization day five, the patient was dismissed with a hemoglobin of 9.7 g/dL. This case demonstrates that splenic embolization is a viable alternative to operative treatment even in the presence of splenomegaly secondary to mononucleosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Salottolo ◽  
Matthew M Carrick ◽  
Robert M Madayag ◽  
James Yon ◽  
Allen Tanner ◽  
...  

BackgroundWe sought to identify predictors of splenic artery embolization (SAE) over observation for hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI), by Organ Injury Scale (OIS) grade.MethodsThis was a multi-institutional retrospective study of all adults (≥18) with BSI who were initially managed non-operatively between 2014 and 2016. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of SAE by OIS grade. Covariates included radiographic characteristics (presence/quantity of hemoperitoneum, blush, vascular injury), demographics (age, sex, cause), Injury Severity Score, vital signs, and hemoglobin values. We also examined outcomes of death, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, blood products, and failed non-operative management (NOM).ResultsAmong 422 patients with stable BSI, 93 (22%) had SAE and 329 (78%) were observed. The rate of SAE increased by grade (p<0.001). In grade I and II BSI, 7% had SAE; significant predictors of SAE were blush (OR: 5.9, p=0.02), moderate or large hemoperitoneum (OR: 3.0, p=0.01), and male sex (OR: 6.3, p=0.05). In grade III BSI, 26% had SAE; significant predictors included moderate or large hemoperitoneum (OR: 3.9, p=0.04), motor vehicle crash (OR: 6.1, p=0.005), and age (OR=1.4, 40% with each decade increase in age, p=0.02). The rate of SAE was 52% for grade IV and 85% for grade V BSI; there were no independent predictors of SAE in either grade. Clinical outcomes were comparable by NOM strategy and grade, except longer LOS with SAE in grades I–III (p<0.05) and longer ICU LOS with SAE in grades I–IV (p<0.05). Only 5 (1.2%) patients failed NOM (4 observation, 1 SAE).ConclusionThese results strongly support SAE consideration for patients with stable grade IV and V BSI even if there are no other high-risk clinical or radiographic findings. For grades I–III, the identified predictors may help refine consideration for SAE.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective epidemiological study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document