Long Term Survival after Colonic Stenting and Restenting for Malignant Colonic Obstruction

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-459
Author(s):  
Khristian A. Noto ◽  
Christopher Almario ◽  
Pinckney J. Maxwell ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
Gerald A. Isenberg ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB397-AB398
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Corsato Scomparin ◽  
Bruno da Costa Martins ◽  
Carlos F. Marques ◽  
Caio Sergio R. Nahas ◽  
Fabio S. Kawaguti ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 756-760
Author(s):  
Michiya Kobayashi ◽  
Kimio Matsuura ◽  
Keijiro Araki ◽  
Eisuke Kashiwai ◽  
Naoshige Tochika ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Se Hyun Jang ◽  
Bora Keum ◽  
Sanghyun Kim ◽  
Kang Won Lee ◽  
Han Jo Jeon ◽  
...  

153 Background: About 10-25% patients of colorectal cancer suffer from acute colonic obstruction. Traditional management of acute malignant bowel obstruction has focused on emergency resection but showed high mortality and morbidity rates. Recently, placement of a self-expanding metal stent(SEMS) was widely used and SEMS seems to be as a safe and effective “bridge to surgery” and to offer good palliation. But there is concern about long-term survival after the use of SEMS. Theoretically, tumor cell seeding can occur due to mechanical force during the stent insertion. To identify this theoretical validity, we surveyed long-term survival of malignant colonic obstruction using SEMS placement. Methods: This retrospective study included 303 patients who presented in Korea University Anam Hospital between 2006 and 2014 with obstructing CRC, and underwent surgical resection. Patients were devided into two group: the “SEMS” group included 148 patients who underwent endoscopic stent as a bridge to surgery, and the surgery group included 155 patients who underwent emergency or elective surgery without stenting. In addition, candidates for curative resection were identified (98 patients in “SEMS” group vs 101 patients in “surgery” group). The clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival(OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics, tumor stage between the two group. The median follow-up times were 48.5 months (IQR, 19.1-73.1 months) for the SEMS group and 39.4 months (IQR, 15.1-39.4 months) for the surgery group. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS rate between two groups (59.6% vs 56.8%; p = 0.3). The 5-year RFS rate did not significantly differ between two groups (71.0% vs. 61.3%; p = 0.221). The long-term oncologic safety did not significantly differ between two groups in either the 5-year OS rate (79.5% vs 74.5%; P= 0.6). or the 5-year RFS rate (95.8% vs 95.8%; P = 0.3). Conclusions: SEMS as bridge to surgery in obstructive CRC did not worsen the long-term oncologic outcomes compared to those of the primary surgery.


2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB449
Author(s):  
Maarten W. Van Den Berg ◽  
Didi Sloothaak ◽  
Marcel G. Dijkgraaf ◽  
Edwin Van Der Zaag ◽  
Willem a. Bemelman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Tan ◽  
Zi-Lin Liu ◽  
Meng-Ni Ran ◽  
Ling-Han Tang ◽  
Yan-Jun Pu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is controversy regarding the efficacy of different treatment strategies for acute left malignant colonic obstruction. This study investigated the prognosis of several treatment strategies for acute left malignant colonic obstruction. Methods A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were performed. Results The network meta-analysis involved 48 articles, including 8 (Randomized controlled trials) RCTs and 40 non-RCTs. Short-term results: Compared with emergency surgery (ES) strategies, colonic stent-bridge to surgery (CS-BTS) and transanal colorectal tube-bridge to surgery (TCT-BTS) strategies can significantly increase the primary anastomosis rate, CS-BTS and decompressing stoma-bridge to surgery (DS-BTS) strategies can significantly reduce mortality, and CS-BTS strategies can significantly reduce the permanent stoma rate. The hospital stay of DS-BTS is significantly longer than that of other strategies. There was no significant difference in the anastomotic leakage levels of several treatment strategies. Long-term results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the CS-BTS strategy and the DS-BTS strategy were significantly better than those of the ES strategy, and the 5-year OS of the DS-BTS strategy was significantly better than that of CS-BTS. The long-term survival of TCT-BTS was not significantly different from those of CS-BTS and ES. Conclusion Different preoperative decompression strategies may improve the prognosis of patients with acute left malignant colon obstruction. Comprehensive literature research, we found that timely and effective relief of intestinal obstruction would bring a better prognosis. Therefore, CS-BTS, DS-BTS and TCT-BTS are better than ES. Compared with CS-BTS and DS-BTS, CS-BTS has the risk of re-obstruction and intestinal perforation, and the long-term prognosis is slightly worse than that of DS-BTS. Without considering the length of stay and cost, DS-BTS strategy is the best choice.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 328
Author(s):  
Mario Morino ◽  
Alberto Arezzo ◽  
Francesca Farnesi ◽  
Edoardo Forcignanò

Nowadays, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer, and about a third of patients with CRC presents themselves with symptoms of large bowel obstruction. Historically, surgical resection was the treatment of choice for colonic obstruction, but this kind of approach is burdened by a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. In recent times, the use of a colonic stent has been proposed to overcome the obstruction and transform an emergency surgical case into an elective one to avoid emergency surgery complications. Endoscopic stenting is the first-line treatment option in the palliative management of colonic obstruction, and there is sufficient scientific evidence to support this approach. However, endoscopic stent used as a bridge to surgery is not yet widely adopted because the concern was raised about the long-term survival and cancer safety of this approach. The recent scientific evidence has shown that this approach improves the short-term outcomes, such as postoperative complications and the stoma rate, without differences in long-term outcomes compared to emergency surgery. Therefore, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in 2020 has reconsidered stenting as a bridge to surgery as a valid alternative to emergency surgery.


2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuto Takenaka ◽  
Mine Harada ◽  
Tomoaki Fujisaki ◽  
Koji Nagafuji ◽  
Shinichi Mizuno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document