Airline Price Wars: Competition Or Predation

1999 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-518
Author(s):  
Roger D. Blair ◽  
Jeffrey L. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
pp. 9-32
Author(s):  
Michael Bungert
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Porter
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-385
Author(s):  
Chrysovalantis Amountzias

PurposeThis study investigates the pricing decisions of the UK wholesale and retail food, beverages and tobacco sector over 2007–2016 using 19 four-digit level NACE Rev.2 classification industries.Design/methodology/approachThe Hall (1988) and Roeger (1995) model is employed to estimate the price-cost margin for the aggregate sector and each constituent industry.FindingsThe results suggest the presence of weak imperfect competitive conduct as the markup value is close to perfect competition. Moreover, it is found that industries with higher market share and liquidity reserves tend to charge a lower markup, validating the presence of price wars and competitive incentives in the sector.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the literature of pricing decisions and how access to available liquidity may affect the selling price of products. The pricing strategies also depend on the market structure as firms operating in more competitive sectors may start price wars more often than their counterparts in more concentrated sectors. Therefore, this study adds value to the investigation of pricing decisions under liquidity constraints across the UK wholesale and retail food, beverages and tobacco firms.


2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaim Fershtman ◽  
Ariel Pakes
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol &NA; (885) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
&NA;
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Ashok Som

Mahut Group (name disguised) was a family-owned business group that operated two cement companies, Heera and Moti (names disguised), in Gujarat, the Western part of India. Heera Cement had been making substantial losses since its inception and was currently under the consideration of Board of Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). Moti Cement was also a loss-making company but the losses were not as substantial as that of Heera. Each of the cement companies, Heera and Moti, had a production capacity of 1.2 million tons of cement per annum. The Mahut Cement Group had about 1000 employees, out of which about 30 personnel were in the top management. As of 1999, both the cement companies competed with each other in addition to competing with other cement players operating in Gujarat. The cement industry was deregulated in India in the late 1980's which resulted in fierce competition and price wars among the cement firms. In the face of this fierce competition, the Group decided on a restructuring process, and hired an American consulting firm, in 1998, to find a "synergy" between the two companies, Heera and Moti, and help the two companies to turnaround. This case discusses the issues of the restructuring process and the various interventions undertaken by the top management of Mahut Group. The case discusses the recommendations of the consultant and the role of human resource management during the restructuring process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Christina Zhang ◽  
Melissa Farboudi Jahromi ◽  
Murat Kizildag
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document