Restructuring Educational Opportunity in England

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Edwards

Contrary to ‘Old Labour’ inclinations to end academic selection, and diminish the privileges of private schooling, both traditional features of the English secondary education have been untouched by the ‘New Labour’ Government. More significantly, traditional egalitarian objectives have been rejected as incompatible with a modernised system offering diversity and choice. This paper examines some effects on educational opportunity of policies which have both preserved old forms of relative advantage and created new ones. In the context of the Labour Government's declared commitment to evidence-based policy, the paper focuses more on research than on competing arguments.

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Goldson

For over a decade, three successive New Labour administrations have subjected the English youth justice system to a seemingly endless sequence of reforms. At the root of such activity lies a core tension between measured reason and punitive emotion; between an expressed commitment to ‘evidence-based policy’ and a populist rhetoric of ‘tough’ correctionalism. By engaging a detailed analytical assessment of New Labour’s youth justice programme, this article advances an argument that the trajectory of policy has ultimately moved in a diametrically opposed direction to the route signalled by research-based knowledge and practice-based evidence. Moreover, such knowledge— policy rupture has produced a youth justice system that ultimately comprises a conduit of social harm. All of this raises serious questions of knowledge/evidence—policy relations and, more fundamentally, of democracy, power and accountability.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Hahn ◽  
David Lagnado ◽  
Stephan Lewandowsky ◽  
Nick Chater

The present crisis demands an all-out response if it is to be mastered with minimal damage. This means we, as the behavioural science community, need to think about how we can adapt to best support evidence-based policy in a rapidly changing, high-stakes environment. This piece is an attempt to initiate this process. The ‘recommendations’ made are first stabs that will hopefully be critiqued, debated and improved.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Pfaff ◽  
Christopher P. Guzelian

FORUM ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAURICE GALTON
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document