Recovery-oriented intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services: An integrative review

2020 ◽  
pp. 002076402096663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Jørgensen ◽  
Tonie Rasmussen ◽  
Morten Hansen ◽  
Kate Andreasson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Patient Journey ◽  
Mental Health Hospitals

Background: Recovery-oriented intersectoral care is described as an aim in mental healthcare to create a holistic framework for planning that provides integration of treatment and rehabilitation. Existing studies show that nurses and other professionals do not take responsibility for the collaborative element of intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services. The users of mental healthcare do not experience their patient journey as a cohesive process when they are discharged from a mental health hospital to community mental health services. Aim: The integrative review aims to examine the professionals’ experience with recovery-oriented intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services. Design: Since the aim was to review user experience, we chose an integrative review as an obvious choice for design. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Findings: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The interactive inductive and deductive analysis generated four themes, which clarify the experience of professionals with recovery-oriented intersectoral care between the mental health hospitals and community mental health services, namely ‘structurally routine care’, ‘unequal balance of power between the sectors’, ‘bureaucracy as a barrier to recovery-oriented intersectoral care’ and ‘flexible mental healthcare approaches’. Conclusion: This review achieves specific knowledge of recovery-oriented intersectoral care. The studies included show that recovery-oriented intersectoral care is not clearly defined. It is challenging to transfer intersectoral care to an organisation with different structural and linguistic barriers.

scholarly journals Development of a Perceived Access Inventory for Community Care Mental Healthcare Services for Veterans

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (7-8) ◽  
pp. e301-e308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M Pyne ◽  
P Adam Kelly ◽  
Ellen P Fischer ◽  
Christopher J Miller ◽  
Patricia Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
Mental Health Providers ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Perceived Access

Abstract Introduction Access to high-quality healthcare, including mental healthcare, is a high priority for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Meaningful monitoring of progress will require patient-centered measures of access. To that end, we developed the Perceived Access Inventory focused on access to VA mental health services (PAI-VA). However, VA is purchasing increasing amounts of mental health services from community mental health providers. In this paper, we describe the development of a PAI for users of VA-funded community mental healthcare that incorporates access barriers unique to community care service use and compares the barriers most frequently reported by veterans using community mental health services to those most frequently reported by veterans using VA mental health services. Materials and Methods We conducted mixed qualitative and quantitative interviews with 25 veterans who had experience using community mental health services through the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). We used opt-out invitation letters to recruit veterans from three geographic regions. Data were collected on sociodemographics, rurality, symptom severity, and service satisfaction. Participants also completed two measures of perceived barriers to mental healthcare: the PAI-VA adapted to focus on access to mental healthcare in the community and Hoge’s 13-item measure. This study was reviewed and approved by the VA Central Institutional Review Board. Results Analysis of qualitative interview data identified four topics that were not addressed in the PAI-VA: veterans being billed directly by a VCP mental health provider, lack of care coordination and communication between VCP and VA mental health providers, veterans needing to travel to a VA facility to have VCP provider prescriptions filled, and delays in VCP re-authorization. To develop a PAI for community-care users, we created items corresponding to each of the four community-care-specific topics and added them to the 43-item PAI-VA. When we compared the 10 most frequently endorsed barriers to mental healthcare in this study sample to the ten most frequently endorsed by a separate sample of current VA mental healthcare users, six items were common to both groups. The four items unique to community-care were: long waits for the first mental health appointment, lack of awareness of available mental health services, short appointments, and providers’ lack of knowledge of military culture. Conclusions Four new barriers specific to veteran access to community mental healthcare were identified. These barriers, which were largely administrative rather than arising from the clinical encounter itself, were included in the PAI for community care. Study strengths include capturing access barriers from the veteran experience across three geographic regions. Weaknesses include the relatively small number of participants and data collection from an early stage of Veteran Choice Program implementation. As VA expands its coverage of community-based mental healthcare, being able to assess the success of the initiative from the perspective of program users becomes increasingly important. The 47-item PAI for community care offers a useful tool to identify barriers experienced by veterans in accessing mental healthcare in the community, overall and in specific settings, as well as to track the impact of interventions to improve access to mental healthcare.

scholarly journals “I wouldn’t know where to start”: Perspectives from clinicians, agency leaders, and autistic adults on improving community mental health services for autistic adults

Autism ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenna B Maddox ◽  
Samantha Crabbe ◽  
Rinad S Beidas ◽  
Lauren Brookman-Frazee ◽  
Carolyn C Cannuscio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Developmental Disabilities ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
The United States ◽  
Autistic Adults

Most autistic adults struggle with mental health problems, and traditional mental health services generally do not meet their needs. This study used qualitative methods to identify ways to improve community mental health services for autistic adults for treatment of their co-occurring psychiatric conditions. We conducted semistructured, open-ended interviews with 22 autistic adults with mental healthcare experience, 44 community mental health clinicians, and 11 community mental health agency leaders in the United States. The participants identified clinician-, client-, and systems-level barriers and facilitators to providing quality mental healthcare to autistic adults. Across all three stakeholder groups, most of the reported barriers involved clinicians’ limited knowledge, lack of experience, poor competence, and low confidence working with autistic adults. All three groups also discussed the disconnect between the community mental health and developmental disabilities systems, which can result in autistic adults being turned away from services when they contact the mental health division and disclose their autism diagnosis during the intake process. Further efforts are needed to train clinicians to work more effectively with autistic adults and to increase coordination between the mental health and developmental disabilities systems. Lay Abstract Most autistic adults struggle with mental health problems, such as anxiety and depression. However, they often have trouble finding effective mental health treatment in their community. The goal of this study was to identify ways to improve community mental health services for autistic adults. We interviewed 22 autistic adults with mental healthcare experience, 44 community mental health clinicians (outpatient therapists, case managers, and intake coordinators), and 11 community mental health agency leaders in the United States. Our participants identified a variety of barriers to providing quality mental healthcare to autistic adults. Across all three groups, most of the reported barriers involved clinicians’ limited knowledge, lack of experience, poor competence, and low confidence working with autistic adults. All three groups also discussed the disconnect between the community mental health and developmental disabilities systems and the need to improve communication between these two systems. Further efforts are needed to train clinicians and provide follow-up consultation to work more effectively with autistic adults. A common suggestion from all three groups was to include autistic adults in creating and delivering the clinician training. The autistic participants provided concrete recommendations for clinicians, such as consider sensory issues, slow the pace, incorporate special interests, use direct language, and set clear expectations. Our findings also highlight a need for community education about co-occurring psychiatric conditions with autism and available treatments, in order to increase awareness about treatment options.

scholarly journals Three models of community mental health services In low-income countries

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Cohen ◽  
Julian Eaton ◽  
Birgit Radtke ◽  
Christina George ◽  
Bro Manuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
Low Income Countries

Patterns of care in community mental health services in Lombardy

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Lora ◽  
Gabriella Bai ◽  
Callisto Bravi ◽  
Roberto Bezzi ◽  
Francesco Bulgarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Sono State ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
Patterns Of Care

RIASSUNTOScopo — L'obiettivo di questo studio è quello di descrivere i patterns di utilizzazione dei pazienti in contatto con 5 Unità Operative di Psichiatria lombarde secondo quattro classi: alti utilizzatori lungoassistiti, alti utilizzatori non lungoassistiti, lungoassistiti non alti utilizzatori, non alti utilizzatori non lungoassistiti. Disegno — Studio descrittivo a partire dai dati ricavati dal Sistema Informativo Psichiatrico regionale; è stata analizzata una coorte di 5.670 pazienti nell'ambito della prevalenza annua relativa all'anno 1994. Setting — 5 Unità Operative di Psichiatria della Regione Lombardia (Merate, Treviglio, Crema, Desio, Castano Primo), con una popolazione complessiva di 610.184 residenti di eta superiore ai 14 anni. Principali misure utilizzate — Sono state prese in considerazione alcune variabili sociodemografiche e cliniche relative ai pazienti; oltre un'analisi descrittiva dei quattro patterns, è stata effettuata una analisi logistica multinomiale. Risultari — Gli alti utilizzatori lungoassistiti (AU-LA), pur rappresentando solo il 5.3% del campione (4.9 casi per 10.000 residenti di età superiore ai 14 anni), consumano il 60% delle risorse espresse in SCS; solo la condizione di separato, divorziato, vedovo è predittiva per tale pattern. Gli alti utilizzatori non lungoassistiti (AU-non LA) costituiscono 1.2% del campione (1.1 casi per 10.000) ed utilizzano il 7.8% del SCS. Variabili predittrici di tale pattern sono l'eta compresa tra i 15-44 anni, l'assenza di un'attivita lavorativa e di un partner, la diagnosi di un disturbo mentale grave e la presenza di contatti con i servizi psichiatrici negli anni 1985-1989. I lungoassistiti non alti utilizzatori (LA-non AU) rappresentano il 23.4% della coorte (21.6 casi per 10.000) e vengono al secondo posto per consumo dirisorse (18.1% del SCS). Sono variabili predittive: l'età compresa tra i 15-44 anni, il vivere da solo, l'assenza di un'attività lavorativa e di un partner, la diagnosi di un disturbo mentale grave e la presenza di contatti con i servizi psichiatrici antecedenti al 1990. I pazienti non lungoassistiti non alti utilizzatori (non LA-non AU), pur rappresentando il 70.1% della coorte (64.8 casi per 10.000), consumano solo il 13.8% del SCS. Conclusioni — I dati mostrano che complessivamente l'attivita delle UOP è orientata nei confronti dei pazienti piu gravi, anche se sono rilevabili marcate differenze tra le UOP lombarde rispetto all'utilizzazione dei servizi. È confermata l'utilita di un Sistema Informativo a diffusione regionale che permetta di monitorare l'evoluzione nel tempo e nel territorio regionale dei patterns di utilizzazione.

Jail Recidivism and Receipt of Community Mental Health Services

1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 793-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Solomon ◽  
Jeffrey Draine ◽  
Arthur Meyerson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Community Mental Health Services
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document