Section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and the Admissibility of Evidence Concerning Child Sexual Assault Complaints: R v Philo-Steele (Alexander) [2020] EWCA Crim 1016, Court of Appeal

2021 ◽  
pp. 002201832199330
Author(s):  
Brian Brewis
1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Breckenridge ◽  
Eileen Baldry

Author(s):  
Timothy P. Roach ◽  
Bradley Campbell ◽  
Melissa Currie ◽  
Sandra Herr ◽  
Kerry Caperell

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-468
Author(s):  
David Gurnham

AbstractThis paper analyses the visualisation of rape and sexual assault in legal and scholarly language. It begins with a critique of the Court of Appeal ruling inR v. Evans (Chedwyn)and its forensic examination of the details of a female rape complainant's consensual sexual activity with other men. The case is analysed in light of a visual metaphor used by Ellison and Munro to describe the removal of popular misconceptions about rape. The paper contextualises that discussion with reference to the idea of the male gaze and its affirmation of a phallocentric cultural and social world in which the objectification of female difference is entrenched. The paper finally challenges that assessment, however, sketching an alternative approach to visual-critical scholarship that embraces interdisciplinarity and a literary sensibility to break (or at least to loosen) the association between the prurient eye of the male voyeur and the criminal justice gaze.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 420-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Golding ◽  
Mary C. Alexander ◽  
Terri L. Stewart

2021 ◽  
pp. 140-166
Author(s):  
Annie Cossins ◽  
Emma Rowden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document