Self-Reported Reasons for Needle Sharing and Not Carrying Bleach among Injection Drug Users in Baltimore, Maryland

1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 865-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl A. Latkin ◽  
Wallace Mandell ◽  
David Vlahov ◽  
Amy R. Knowlton ◽  
Maria Oziemkowska ◽  
...  

Stated reasons for sharing needles and not intending to carry bleach for 413 injection drug users in the Stop AIDS for Everyone (SAFE) study in Baltimore, Maryland, were analyzed. Over two-thirds (69%) reported they knew individuals who had “gotten in trouble” by police for carrying needles. Of the injection drug users, 38% stated the main reason they shared needles without cleaning them first with bleach was a sense of time urgency, and 30% reported that clean needles were not available. The most common reason given by 24% of the participants for not intending to carry bleach was that they inject at home where bleach is available. Another frequently mentioned reason for not intending to carry bleach was wanting to stop using drugs. These results have implications for HIV prevention and suggest the importance of preventive interventions that emphasize drug users' planning where and when they will inject drugs. The findings also suggest that needle sharing may be in part an unintended consequence of Maryland's current drug paraphernalia laws.

2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel A. Macmaster ◽  
Bethany G. Womack

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore M. Hammett ◽  
Nicholas A. Bartlett ◽  
Yi Chen ◽  
Doan Ngu ◽  
Dao Dinh Cuong ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1049-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Wiessing ◽  
Giedrius Likatavičius ◽  
Danica Klempová ◽  
Dagmar Hedrich ◽  
Anthony Nardone ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Peterson ◽  
Shannon Gwin Mitchell ◽  
Yan Hong ◽  
Michael Agar ◽  
Carl Latkin

Many contemporary HIV prevention interventions targeting injection drug users (IDUs) have been implemented using Harm Reduction as a theoretical framework. Among drug-using individuals, however, the abstinence-based "getting clean" models espoused by Narcotics Anonymous and other widely adopted approaches to drug treatment are often more readily accepted. This paper describes an ethnographic examination of the ideological dichotomy between Harm Reduction and abstinence-based "getting clean" treatment model which emerged during the piloting phase of an HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore City, Maryland, USA. This paper describes how the conflict was identified and what changes were made to the intervention to help resolve the participants' dichotomous thinking concerning their substance abuse issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document