Students’ experiences of blended laboratory animal science courses

2021 ◽  
pp. 002367722110414
Author(s):  
Çiğdem Haser ◽  
Sevcan Hakyemez-Paul ◽  
Ella Kujala ◽  
Paulina Chrusciel ◽  
Varpu Laine ◽  
...  

Students and course providers have found online options for laboratory animal science (LAS) courses helpful because the content is accessible with flexible timing options. This study aimed to explore whether a blended LAS course with video lectures would be preferred and perceived effective, accounting for students’ educational levels as well as prior experiences and future expectations in the use of animals. Data were collected by a feedback survey including three 5-Likert type scales and open-ended questions created by the authors. Of the 134 course students from various programmes, 101 consented to the use of their responses in this study. The analyses indicated that the respondents were generally satisfied with the blended course, especially the hands-on components, even though some found video lectures challenging due to their own ineffective time and study management skills. Plans to use animals in the future increased satisfaction with the course significantly, while the education level or previous experience with animals did not affect the outcome. Background variables did not affect views about video lectures significantly. Conclusively, the blended structure seemed to provide sustainable LAS course experiences for normal and unpredictable times.

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3432
Author(s):  
Giuliano M. Corte ◽  
Melanie Humpenöder ◽  
Marcel Pfützner ◽  
Roswitha Merle ◽  
Mechthild Wiegard ◽  
...  

According to the European Directive 63/2010/EU, education and training involving living rats and mice are classified as an animal experiment and demands the implementation of the 3Rs. Therefore, as a method of refinement, rat and mouse simulators were developed to serve as an initial training device for various techniques, prior to working on living animals. Nevertheless, little is known about the implementation, anatomical correctness, learning efficiency and practical suitability of these simulators. With this in mind, a collaborative research project called “SimulRATor” was initiated to systematically evaluate the existing rat and mouse simulators in a multi-perspective approach. The objective of the study presented here was to identify the anatomical strengths and weaknesses of the available rat and mouse simulators and to determine anatomical requirements for a new anatomically correct rat simulator, specifically adapted to the needs of Laboratory Animal Science (LAS) training courses. Consequently, experts of Veterinary Anatomy and LAS evaluated the anatomy of all currently available rat and mouse simulators. The evaluation showed that compared to the anatomy of living rats and mice, the tails were perceived as the most anatomically realistic body part, followed by the general exterior and the limbs. The heads were rated as the least favored body part.


Lab Animal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 359-363
Author(s):  
Axel Kornerup Hansen ◽  
Dorte Bratbo Sørensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document