scholarly journals Application of Single-Case Research Designs in Undergraduate Student Reports: An Example From Wellbeing Science

2021 ◽  
pp. 009862832110299
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Kemp ◽  
Zoe Fisher

Introduction: Psychological science is undergoing a period of change and transformation. Statement of the Problem: The crisis in confidence over psychological science has led to an emphasis on larger and larger sample sizes, sustaining an unfortunate neglect of single-subject research designs in undergraduate education. Literature Review: We identified several excellent articles advocating for the benefits of single-subject and small N designs over group-based research designs, yet single-case designs are seldom taught at undergraduate level. Teaching Implications: Teachers of psychology are provided with resources for implementing training in single-case research designs at undergraduate level, enabling students to draw objective conclusions in an N-of-1 research report. We do this using an example from a recently developed module on wellbeing science. Conclusion: Embedding an underused methodological approach for determining objective change in single individuals into undergraduate psychology curricula will help to develop practical skills applicable to many roles in the discipline of psychology, the healthcare sector and the quantified-self community.

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Kratochwill ◽  
Bonnie L. Williams

Single-case research designs have emerged as a major methodological strategy in some areas of social science research. Yet, single-subject research is plagued by a number of methodological, conceptual, and philosophical problems that have a bearing on the efficacy of these strategies in applied settings. In this article we review briefly some methodological issues in single-case design, including factors such as baseline trends, variability in the data, and duration of phases. In addition, conceptual issues include the range of outcome questions that single-case designs are designed to address as well as establishing the generalizability of findings. Beyond these issues, a number of pitfalls and hassles are likely to emerge, including philosophical objections to single-case research design, replication problems, measurement paradigms that seem incompatible with design assumptions, and the integration of single-case designs into practice.


1986 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Ivan L. Beale

There is growing recognition of the need for adequate procedures for evaluation of the effects of psychotropic drugs on the behaviour of individuals. Traditional methodology for drug evaluation is group based and therefore inappropriate for use with only one or a few subjects. Alternative procedures are described that are suitable for use with even a single subject, based on single-case research designs developed by researchers in applied behaviour analysis. Guidelines are given for choosing designs and methods of measurement that control for the common threats to internal and external validity and will enable clear and unambiguous conclusions to be reached regarding drug effects.


1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 316-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M Proudfoot ◽  
Elizabeth S Farmer ◽  
Jean B McIntosh

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Barton ◽  
Jennifer R. Ledford ◽  
Justin D. Lane ◽  
Jessica Decker ◽  
Sara E. Germansky ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document