Revision Sinus Surgery

1994 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Ng ◽  
Dale H. Rice
2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Christopher McMains ◽  
Stilianos E. Kountakis

Background The aim of this study was to report objective and subjective outcomes after revision sinus surgery (RESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in 125 patients requiring revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery after failing both maximum medical therapy and prior sinus surgery for CRS. Patients were seen and treated over a 3-year period (1999–2001) in a tertiary rhinology setting. Computed tomography (CT) scans were graded as per Lund-MacKay and patient symptom scores were recorded using the Sinonasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20) instrument. Individual rhinosinusitis symptoms were evaluated on a visual analog scale (0–10) before and after surgery. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results The mean number of prior sinus procedures was 1.9 ± 0.1 (range, 1–7) and the mean preoperative CT grade was 13.4 ± 0.7. Patients with asthma and polyposis had higher CT scores than those without these processes. Preoperative mean SNOT-20 and endoscopy scores were 30.7 ± 1.3 and 7.3 ± 0.4, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, mean SNOT-20 and endoscopy scores improved to 7.7 ± 0.6 and 2.1 ± 0.4, respectively (p < 2.8 X 10-10). At 12-month follow-up, each individual symptom score decreased significantly. Overall, 10 patients failed RESS and required additional surgical intervention for an overall failure rate of 8.0%. All patients who failed RESS had nasal polyposis. Conclusion Revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery benefits patients that fail maximum medical therapy and prior sinus surgery for CRS by objective and subjective measures.


1990 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 811???816 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P. Katsantonis ◽  
William H. Friedman ◽  
Michael C. Sivore

2013 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur W. Wu ◽  
Jonathan Y. Ting ◽  
Michael P. Platt ◽  
Hien T. Tierney ◽  
Ralph Metson

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel S. Becker ◽  
Alessandro de Alarcon ◽  
Steven R. Bomeli ◽  
Joseph K. Han ◽  
Charles W. Gross

Background Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery often require multiple revision procedures. Our objective was to identify risk factors for revision sinus surgery in patients with CF, to better identify this subset of patients who might be better suited for alternative interventions at their initial procedure. Methods Patients with CF who presented to our academic tertiary care sinus clinic between 1994 and 2003 were reviewed. Data were collected from CT scans using the Lund-Mackay scale. Data are collected on demographics, comorbidities, CF genotype, number and type of sinus surgeries, and pulmonary function tests. Results Eighty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty patients were <18 years old at presentation. Forty-one patients were Δ508 homozygotes, 32 patients were Δ508 heterozygotes, and 5 patients were non-Δ508 heterozygotes. Respiratory comorbidities were asthma alone (28%) and aspirin triad (5%). Eighteen (22%) patients either smoked or lived with smokers. The mean Lund-Mackay score before the initial surgery was 16. Twenty patients were treated with medication only; 35 patients underwent 1 surgery; 14 patients underwent 2 surgeries; 8 patients underwent 3 surgeries; 2 patients underwent 4 surgeries; and 2 patients underwent 5 surgeries. Patients with higher Lund-Mackay scores at their initial CT were more likely to undergo repeat surgeries (p < 0.05). Conclusion CF patients with high Lund-Mackay scores at their initial surgery are more likely to undergo several revision surgeries. These patients should be considered for more alternative initial management of their sinuses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document