Team Decision Making: The Dynamic Effects of Team Decision Style Composition and Performance via Decision Strategy

2020 ◽  
pp. 014920632091623
Author(s):  
X. Susan Zhu ◽  
Mikhail A. Wolfson ◽  
Dev K. Dalal ◽  
John E. Mathieu

As teams continue to become more prevalent in modern-day organizations, researchers and organizations alike can benefit from a more nuanced understanding of teams’ decision-making process, which can ultimately impact organizational effectiveness. Although team processes are conceptualized as dynamic phenomena, they have largely been treated as static in research. In this study, we draw on the input-mediator-output-input and episodic team performance frameworks to advance a theoretical model of the dynamic, reciprocal effects of team rational decision strategy and team performance as well as the role of team composition of individual rational decision style. We sampled 320 participants in 85 teams competing in a 10-week business strategy simulation where teams made weekly strategic decisions that contributed to team performance. Teams composed of individuals with rational decision styles were more likely to adopt rational decision strategies, which led to better team performance. Additionally, results revealed a positive reciprocal effect between rational decision strategy and team performance such that teams with positive prior performance were more likely to engage in subsequent rational decision strategy. As hypothesized, team composition of members’ rational decision style was the primary determinant of team rational strategy during initial stages of team development, but the valence of outcome feedback (i.e., prior performance) took over as the stronger predictor of team rational strategy during later stages of team development. We contribute to the team and decision-making literatures by examining the dynamic process of team decision making and team performance.

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Donovan ◽  
Dennis J. Devine ◽  
Paige E. Coulter-Kern ◽  
Aron J. Kale

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-226
Author(s):  
Jinyun Duan ◽  
Yue Xu ◽  
M. Lance Frazier

Drawing on social exchange theory, the current research hypothesizes voice climate as a mediator of the relationship between team-member exchange (TMX) and both team decision-making effectiveness and innovative performance. Furthermore, we propose that task interdependence moderates the mediational relationship between TMX, voice climate, team decision-making effectiveness, and innovative performance. Survey results based on 294 members and their leaders from 73 entrepreneur teams demonstrated that TMX is positively related to voice climate and the two outcome variables. In addition, the relationships between TMX and both decision-making effectiveness and innovative performance are mediated by voice climate perceptions, respectively. Task interdependence moderated the relationship between TMX and voice climate, whereas moderated-mediation analyses indicated that the mediational relationship between TMX, voice climate, and both outcomes is stronger when task interdependence is high rather than low.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Cheng ◽  
Zhong-Ming Wang ◽  
Wei Zhang

The aim in this study was to examine the relationship between task and relationship conflict and their effect on team decision-making. A sample of 120 participants, divided into 40 teams, was recruited. We found that the relationship of task and relationship conflict was moderated by the decision-making process and teams performed better when making good use of task conflict, while relationship conflict was reduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document