Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clark Miller
Keyword(s):  
Science Policy ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Climate Regime ◽  
Boundary Organizations ◽  
Hybrid Management

scholarly journals Managing science-policy interfaces for impact: Interactions within the environmental governance meshwork

2020 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 21-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simo Sarkki ◽  
Estelle Balian ◽  
Ulrich Heink ◽  
Hans Keune ◽  
Carsten Nesshöver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Science Policy ◽  
Environmental Governance

Innovativeness and Paralysis in International Climate Policy

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Streck
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
International Law ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Climate Regime ◽  
Market Mechanisms ◽  
International Climate Policy ◽  
To Come ◽  
Private Actors

AbstractThis article describes the challenges of using the constrained tools of international law to negotiate a sustainable framework to address climate change. It sets out to show how the particularities of the problem have led to creative and innovative solutions expanding the borders of international law. To this end, the article discusses carbon market mechanisms, the compliance regime of the Kyoto Protocol, and the emerging framework to create incentives to reduce land-based emissions in developing countries. These examples illustrate that the recognition of the role of sub-national and private entities in mitigating climate change has had significant impact on the rules of the climate regime. But the article also asserts that the un process, while recognizing the role of private actors, is still inadequately equipped to involve non-state actors in a meaningful way. The climate regime therefore challenges the traditional thinking about interstate relationships. No longer solely a matter for international environmental law, contemporary environmental governance has become a global affair, which makes the lens of transnational law a useful tool to think about these issues in practice in a more intellectually fruitful and relevant way. This article thereby provides a snapshot of the type of issues and discussion that readers of this journal can look forward to in the years to come.

Boundary Organizations: Intermediaries in Science–Policy Interactions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wesselink ◽  
Robert Hoppe
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Science Policy ◽  
Boundary Work ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Policy Advice ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Policy Interactions ◽  
Boundary Organizations ◽  
Science And Politics

Scientific knowledge is often not used in policymaking, even when the aim of the research is to produce policy-relevant results and these are communicated clearly and timely. The problem of the discrepancy between scientific outcomes and usable knowledge for policymaking is often labeled “science–policy gap.” Boundary organizations “bridge” this gap. Boundary organizations are intermediary organizations that produce information that is useful in policymaking and at the same time qualify as scientific (here this includes all academic research, including humanities and social sciences). However, boundary organizations are not just “knowledge brokers” that reconcile a demand (by policy makers) for knowledge with the supply (by academics) of knowledge. The knowledge-brokering perspective on science–policy interaction assumes that parcels of knowledge produced by academics are transmitted unchanged to policy makers, along a linear pathway of knowledge transfer from academia to policy makers. Several decades of close study of science–policy interactions has revealed that the production of policy advice cannot realistically be described in terms of clear boundaries between science and politics, nor can it be conceived as linear knowledge transfer leading to knowledge use. The production of policy-relevant information requires mutual engagement by scientists and policy makers in processes of knowledge co-production. Through the co-production process other concerns than purely scientific ones, such as political acceptability, are integrated in the result. Boundary organizations are sites where this co-production is institutionalized. Boundary organizations engage in quality and relevance assessments of existing scientific research and the production of policy advice reports, but also the design of innovative policy instruments and commissioning of new research and the evaluation of policy impacts of prior output. These activities are labeled “boundary work.” They are inherently tricky because they require a balancing act between scientific credibility and policy usefulness. Science and politics are normally demarcated spheres with different procedures and quality criteria. Boundary organizations endeavor to coordinate these apparently incompatible demands through boundary work. Boundary organizations are often presented as “silver bullet” that will solve all frictions and frustrations in science–policy interactions. However, the extent to which boundary organizations can fulfill such expectations depends on several factors: the (inter)national political culture regarding the status and role of science in policymaking, the culture of the policy domain regarding the same, the characteristics of the policy problem itself, and the availability of boundary working skills. Conversely, in many cases the time-consuming and sensitive creation of boundary organizations is not necessary. By extension, it is not possible to define “best practice” on boundary organizations or boundary work. What works is highly context dependent, but also time-dependent, so changes with time.

12. The Challenge of the Environment, Energy, and Climate Change

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Vogler
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Energy Security ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Climate Regime ◽  
International Dimension ◽  
Global Environmental ◽  
International Climate ◽  
The Eu

This chapter examines the European Union's external environmental policy, with particular emphasis on the challenge faced by the EU in exercising leadership in global environmental governance and in the development of the climate change regime. It first considers the international dimension of the EU environmental policy as well as the issue of sustainable development before discussing the EU's efforts to lead the negotiation of an international climate regime up until the 2015 Paris conference. It then explores how the different energy interests of the member states have been accommodated in order to sustain European credibility. It also looks at the question of climate and energy security in the EU and concludes with an assessment of the factors that determine the success or failure of the EU in climate diplomacy, including those that relate to coordination and competence problems peculiar to the EU as a climate negotiator.

The potential role of boundary organizations in the climate regime

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 24-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eungkyoon Lee ◽  
Chan Su Jung ◽  
Myung-Kyoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Potential Role ◽  
Climate Regime ◽  
Boundary Organizations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document