Abstract
Background
Aural atresia (CAA) is a congenital abnormality with hypoplasia or aplasia of the external auditory canal. Surgical procedures of CAA is not only difficult but has still not been embraced by surgeons. Many surgeons are doubtful to perform a repair due to poor hearing results and the risk of new canal stenosis. This article describes the writers’ expertise with surgical management of aural atresia. A retrospective study of 16 cases of CAA was undertaken in the Hearing and Speech Institute between 2015 and 2018. The study consisted of 16 patients, 8 patients for each group, 10 males and 6 females between 4 and 18 years of age with a median age of 6 years. Ten patients had bilateral atresia, and 6 had unilateral atresia. Postoperatively, patients were tested for hearing recovery and follow-up lasting up to 2 years to record any complications. Purpose of the study was to compare hearing effects and risks of anterior and transmastoid approaches to external and middle ear restoration in patients with CAA.
Results
All patients were satisfied with the surgery by improving the hearing up to 35 dB or less after 12 months. Four patients (25%) developed soft tissue meatal stenosis, with 2 patients in each group. There were no cases of bony canal stenosis. TM perforation was seen in two patients (12.51%), one patient in each group. Lateralization of the graft was seen in one patient in the transmastoid group, and no ossicular chain refixation. Five cases had postoperative otorrhea, one in the anterior mastoid group and four in the transmastoid group. There were no other complications.
Conclusions
Although the findings of the hearing are close. The previous approach, due to fewer postoperative complications, is now our favorite technique. Proper alignment and soft-tissue strategies are keys to the effective correction of the congenitally atretic ear canal.
Congenital aural atresia surgery: anterior mastoid and transmastoid approaches
