A Training Course on Laboratory Animal Science: An Initiative to Implement the Three Rs of Animal Research in India

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Pratap ◽  
Vijay Pal Singh
1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.M.S. Russell

In 1955–57, in the course of a study initiated by Charles Hume and the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Rex Burch and I conceived of the Three Rs of humane experimental technique — replacement, reduction and refinement. Except for the foundation, in 1969, and the early work, of FRAME, the next two decades saw little development of the Three Rs, and widespread scepticism about the possibilities of replacement, especially in activity and toxicity testing. In the 1980s and early 1990s, advances in tissue culture technique led to spectacular progress in fundamental pharmacology and toxicology. There have also been important recent advances in aspects of refinement discussed in our book published in 1959, notably in anaesthesia and analgesia, and in the application of ethology. However, there has been less progress in reduction, except for one ingenious new statistical technique for reducing numbers of animals used for testing vaccines. Developments we scarcely touched on in 1959 include the application of the Three Rs to the production and testing of vaccines, the education of experimenters in laboratory animal science (both of these developments pioneered in The Netherlands), and the replacement of animals in teaching by the use of computers and audiovisual displays. A priority for the future is the application of the Three Rs to work with primates. New uses for experimental animals continue to arise, but, after recent successes, we can now have considerable confidence in the progress of humane experimental technique.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlies Leenaars ◽  
Bart Savenije ◽  
Anne Nagtegaal ◽  
Lilian van der Vaart ◽  
Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga

A survey among scientists into the current practice of searching for Replacement, Reduction and Refinement (Three Rs) alternatives, highlights the gap between the statutory required need to apply the Three Rs concept whenever possible and the lack of criteria for searching for Three Rs alternatives. A questionnaire was distributed to 342 scientists (Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations [FELASA] Category C and B individuals), of which 67 responded. These scientists are customers of the Central Animal Laboratory of Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre. The results indicate that there is room for improvement in searching effectively for the Three Rs: skills in searching biomedical databases for Three Rs alternatives are limited, knowledge of specialised Three Rs databases is very limited, and satisfaction on the availability and accessibility of Three Rs information is low. None of the respondents allocate budget for a specific Three Rs alternatives search, although 50% do spend, on average, two hours engaged in this search for each application to their animal ethics committees. The majority of the respondents expressed the wish that the search for alternatives could be easier and less time consuming, and prefer to achieve this through the service offered by specialists at the Central Animal Laboratory. On the basis of the results from the questionnaire, the 3R Research Centre was established, with the aim of providing services and support for bio-medical scientists, to improve the search for, and subsequent implementation of, the Three Rs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document