Nipple Discharge as a Sign of Preneoplastic Lesion and Occult Carcinoma of the Breast: Clinical and Galactographic Study in 103 Consecutive Patients

1979 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Di Pietro ◽  
Gianfranco Coopmans De Yoldi ◽  
Silvana Bergonzi ◽  
Gianstefano Gardani ◽  
Roberto Saccozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Preneoplastic Lesion ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Breast ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
Sclerosing Adenosis

A clinical and galactographic investigation was carried out on 103 patients with hematic, serous-hematic, and serous nipple discharge. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 72 years. A single papilloma was found in 20 cases, diffuse papillomatosis in 2 cases, atypical ductal hyperplasia in 8 cases, and ductal carcinoma in 4 cases (3 of these were infiltrating and 1 was noninfiltrating associated with a diffuse papillomatosis). Mammography gave no indications of carcinoma in any of the 4 cases. In the remaining 49 patients, pictures of ductal hyperplasia, periductal mastitis or sclerosis, sclerosing adenosis, or ductal ectasia were observed. The various types of lesions were often associated. Lacunae, stenosis, or occlusion of the ducts, evidenced by galactography, correlated well with the histologic findings of proliferative lesions of the ductal epithelium. Nevertheless, in practice, it should be the type of discharge that indicates surgery rather than galactographic or cytologic data, which appeared to have little diagnostic value. The frequency with which preneoplastic (or limit) lesions, and also nonsuspect carcinomas were found in patients with a significant nipple discharge confirm the importance of this symptom for a secondary prevention or early diagnosis of mammary neoplastic lesions originating from galactophorous ducts. Finally, complete resection of the galactophorous ducts must be considered as the best treatment in all patients with a suspicious nipple discharge that requires surgery.

Minimal (≤0.1 cm) Invasive Carcinoma in Breast Core Needle Biopsies

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (9) ◽  
pp. 996-999
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Invasive Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Ductal Carcinomas ◽  
Invasive Carcinomas

Abstract Context.—Although minimally invasive (microinvasive) carcinoma (≤0.1 cm) of the breast is a well-known and well-characterized entity in excision specimens, the significance of small foci of invasion in breast core needle biopsies has not been well described. Objective.—To define the significance of minimally invasive carcinoma in breast core needle biopsies. Design.—Review of a large series of core needle biopsies for invasive carcinomas measuring 0.1 cm or less and correlation of the results with those of subsequent excision. Setting.—Large community hospital. Results.—From approximately 8500 biopsies, a total of 18 cases of minimally invasive carcinoma from 16 women aged 42 to 80 years were identified. All were present on only 1 of 8 slides made from the block. Overall, the incidence was approximately 0.1% of all biopsies and 1% of all invasive carcinomas. Six cases were invasive lobular carcinomas, 1 was tubulolobular carcinoma, 3 were tubular carcinomas, and the remaining 8 were ductal carcinomas. Eight cases were associated with high-grade comedo ductal carcinomas, 2 with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, 3 with atypical ductal hyperplasia, 3 with atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ, and 2 with no other lesion. From a total of 8 sections done entirely through the block, the lesion was present on the first level in 4 cases and the fifth level in 5 cases. No cases were identified in the last 3 levels. Subsequent pathology was available for 16 of the 18 cases. Invasive carcinomas measuring more than 1 cm were present in 9 cases (64%; along with 2 positive lymph nodes), invasive carcinomas less than 1 cm in 2 cases (14%), ductal carcinoma alone in 4 cases (29%), and no carcinoma in 1 case (7%). No pathologic or radiologic features were associated with the finding of invasive carcinoma at excision. Conclusion.—Invasive carcinoma measuring 0.1 cm or less is a rare finding in breast core needle biopsies, is commonly associated with in situ carcinomas and atypical hyperplasias, and is often associated with larger invasive foci at excision. However, invasive carcinomas smaller than 0.1 cm can occur without any other significant findings and may require relatively extensive sampling to identify.

scholarly journals Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Badan ◽  
Decio Roveda Júnior ◽  
Sebastião Piato ◽  
Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury ◽  
Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Underestimation Rate

Abstract Objective: To determine the rates of diagnostic underestimation at stereotactic percutaneous core needle biopsies (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABB) of nonpalpable breast lesions, with histopathological results of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subsequently submitted to surgical excision. As a secondary objective, the frequency of ADH and DCIS was determined for the cases submitted to biopsy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 40 cases with diagnosis of ADH or DCIS on the basis of biopsies performed between February 2011 and July 2013, subsequently submitted to surgery, whose histopathological reports were available in the internal information system. Biopsy results were compared with those observed at surgery and the underestimation rate was calculated by means of specific mathematical equations. Results: The underestimation rate at CNB was 50% for ADH and 28.57% for DCIS, and at VABB it was 25% for ADH and 14.28% for DCIS. ADH represented 10.25% of all cases undergoing biopsy, whereas DCIS accounted for 23.91%. Conclusion: The diagnostic underestimation rate at CNB is two times the rate at VABB. Certainty that the target has been achieved is not the sole determining factor for a reliable diagnosis. Removal of more than 50% of the target lesion should further reduce the risk of underestimation.

Immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin in sclerosing adenosis, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

2009 ◽  
pp. NA-NA
Author(s):  
Gil Facina ◽  
Pedro Vitor Lopes-Costa ◽  
Alesse Ribeiro Dos Santos ◽  
Rodrigo Jose De Vasconcelos-Valença ◽  
André Luis Pinho-Sobral ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Breast ◽  
Sclerosing Adenosis ◽  
E Cadherin

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy

2000 ◽  
Vol 175 (5) ◽  
pp. 1341-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla L. Rosenfield Darling ◽  
Darrell N. Smith ◽  
Susan C. Lester ◽  
Carolyn Kaelin ◽  
Donna-Lee G. Selland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Breast Biopsy ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Large Core ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia

scholarly journals TP8.1.12 Diagnostic Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of Potential Malignancy in Patients Presented with Nipple Discharge

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nixon Phua Cher Yang ◽  
Muhammad Adeel Javed Butt ◽  
Parmvir Singh Nijjar ◽  
Saung Phyu ◽  
Musa Barkeji
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Imaging Tool ◽  
Additional Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Aims Nipple discharge is a presentation commonly seen at breast clinics. It is conventionally evaluated with physical examination and sonography( or mammography). The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an additional imaging tool in the evaluation of potential malignancy in patients presented with nipple discharge. Methods A retrospective evaluation of 85 patients with nipple discharge who underwent breast ultrasound (USS) and MRI between 04/06/2008 and 25/10/2019 was conducted. Clinical notes, radiographic reports and biopsy results were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USS and MRI were calculated. Results Out of the 85 patients (all female; mean age 45.33 +/- 12.93 years old) with nipple discharge, 11 were found to have biopsy-proven malignancy (invasive ductal carcinoma/ ductal carcinoma in situ; 12.94% risk). USS failed to identify seven malignancies (27.27% sensitivity) while MRI missed three malignancies (72.72% sensitivity). USS falsely identified four malignancies from 74 patients with no malignancy (94.59% specificity) while MRI only falsely identified one case (98.65% specificity). For patients with negative USS results (U1/U2/U3) or negative MRI results (BI-RADS category 1,2 or 3), the negative predictive values of USS is 89.74% while that of MRI is 96.05%. The positive predictive values of USS and MRI are 42.86% and 88.88% respectively. Conclusion Compared to USS, MRI has a higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and predictive value. It will be a valuable addition to the standard nipple discharge evaluation workup to help rule out malignancy.

Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Lesions on Core Needle Biopsy: Upgrade Rates and Interobserver Variability

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 736-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianqun Qiu ◽  
Daniel D. Mais ◽  
Marlo Nicolas ◽  
Jennifer Nanyes ◽  
Kenneth Kist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Interobserver Variability ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Papillary Lesions

The histologic distinction between papillary breast lesions remains challenging, especially with core biopsy (CB) specimens. A retrospective review of the clinical, imaging, and histologic findings was performed for patients with papillary breast lesions on CB from 2013 to 2017. The interpretation accuracy was expressed as upgrade rate relative to the excision diagnosis. Diagnostic reproducibility with and without immunohistochemistry was analyzed as interobserver variability among 3 board-certified pathologists. Among 57 papillary lesions with biopsies and excisions available for review, the upgrade rates were 0% for benign papilloma, 30% for papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia, and 25% for papilloma with ductal carcinoma in situ, resulting in an overall upgrade rate of 11.1%. There were no statistical differences between patients in an upgrade group and others, when comparing the patient age, clinical presentation, BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System) category, location, and histologic grade. The overall interobserver variability of the 60 consecutive core biopsies of papillary breast lesions by morphology alone was in the “substantial” agreement range (κ = 0.79, 86% agreement), with an excellent κ score of 0.88 for papilloma (92% agreement). “Substantial” and “fair” κ values were seen for papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ (0.74, 84% agreement) and invasive carcinoma (0.40, 60% agreement). Use of immunohistochemical stains improved the κ values into “excellent” range (0.92, 94% agreement). Our study favors a conservative approach in the management of benign papillomas, at least in cases of good radiologic-pathologic concordance. Papillary breast lesions with atypia/malignancy show lower diagnostic reproducibility on CB, and utility of immunohistochemistry is recommended in challenging cases.

scholarly journals Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. e757-e760
Author(s):  
Simukayi Mutasa ◽  
Peter Chang ◽  
John Nemer ◽  
Eduardo Pascual Van Sant ◽  
Mary Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Prospective Analysis ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document